World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruno Gander

Bruno Gander

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
12050
World Ranking
10931
National Ranking
195

Bruno Gander publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Gander sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 116 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bruno Gander D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Gander sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Gander is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland, with a research focus spanning several fields within the biological sciences. Their work primarily encompasses areas of Immunology and Microbiology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Medicine. Specific subfields include Immunology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Reproductive Medicine, Physiology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics cover multiple aspects of immunotherapy and immune responses, animal behavior and reproduction, and bat biology and ecology studies. More detailed themes in their work include interferon and immune responses, immune response and inflammation, sperm and testicular function, and reproductive biology with impacts on aquatic species.

Bruno Gander has contributed to several recent publications, notable for their diversity in both subject matter and publication venues. These include:

  • PLGA-particle vaccine carrying TLR3/RIG-I ligand Riboxxim synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for effective anti-cancer immunotherapy, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Effects of experimental increase in insulin-like growth factor 1 on feather growth rate, moult intensity and feather quality in a passerine bird, 2021, Journal of Experimental Biology
  • Amphiphilic Cyclodextrin-Based Nanoparticulate Vaccines Can Trigger T-Cell Immune Responses, 2021, Advanced NanoBiomed Research
  • Photochemical internalization (PCI)-mediated activation of CD8 T cells involves antigen uptake and CCR7-mediated transport by migratory dendritic cells to draining lymph nodes, 2021, Journal of Controlled Release
  • Insulin-like growth factor 1 induces oxidative damage, but does not affect survival in a songbird, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors in Bruno Gander's research projects include Sarah Vogel-Kindgen, Ádám Z. Lendvai, Zsófia Tóth, Katharina Mahr, and Philipp Schineis. These collaborative efforts reflect interdisciplinary approaches within their fields of study.

The publication venues associated with Bruno Gander's work reflect a range of specialized scientific journals and platforms, including:

  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Experimental Biology
  • Advanced NanoBiomed Research
  • Journal of Controlled Release
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

This profile underscores Bruno Gander's engagement with immunological research, biological sciences, and interdisciplinary collaboration, contributing to a spectrum of scientific knowledge particularly focused on immune mechanisms, reproductive biology, and ecological studies.

Best Publications

  • Microencapsulation by solvent extraction/evaporation: reviewing the state of the art of microsphere preparation process technology.

    Sergio Freitas;Hans P. Merkle;Bruno Gander

  • Formulation aspects of biodegradable polymeric microspheres for antigen delivery.

    Harjit Tamber;Pål Johansen;Hans P. Merkle;Bruno A. Gander

  • Localized delivery of growth factors for bone repair.

    Vera Luginbuehl;Lorenz Meinel;Hans P. Merkle;Bruno A. Gander

  • Nerve conduits and growth factor delivery in peripheral nerve repair

    Lukas A. Pfister;Michaël Papaloïzos;Hans P. Merkle;Bruno A. Gander

  • TLR ligands and antigen need to be coencapsulated into the same biodegradable microsphere for the generation of potent cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses

    Eva Schlosser;Marc Mueller;Stefan Fischer;Sameh Basta

  • Particulate vaccines: on the quest for optimal delivery and immune response.

    Marie-Luce De Temmerman;Joanna Rejman;Jo Demeester;Darrell J. Irvine

  • Revisiting PLA/PLGA microspheres: an analysis of their potential in parenteral vaccination.

    Pål Johansen;Ying Men;Hans P Merkle;Bruno Gander

  • Tetanus toxoid and synthetic malaria antigen containing poly(lactide)/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres : importance of polymer degradation and antigen release for immune response

    Claudio Thomasin;Giampietro Corradin;Ying Men;Hans P. Merkle

  • Silk fibroin matrices for the controlled release of nerve growth factor (NGF).

    Lorenz Uebersax;Marta Mattotti;Michaël Papaloïzos;Hans P. Merkle

  • Administration routes affect the quality of immune responses: A cross-sectional evaluation of particulate antigen-delivery systems

    Deepa Mohanan;Bram Slutter;Malou Henriksen-Lacey;Wim Jiskoot

  • Trophically and topographically functionalized silk fibroin nerve conduits for guided peripheral nerve regeneration

    Srinivas Madduri;M. Papaloïzos;Bruno A. Gander

  • A single administration of tetanus toxoid in biodegradable microspheres elicits T cell and antibody responses similar or superior to those obtained with aluminum hydroxide.

    Ying Men;Claudio Thomasin;Hans P. Merkle;Bruno Gander

  • Gentamicin-Loaded Hydraulic Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement as Antibiotic Delivery System

    Marc Bohner;Jacques Lemaître;Pascale Van Landuyt;Pierre-Yves Zambelli

  • Miconazole nanosuspensions: Influence of formulation variables on particle size reduction and physical stability.

    Ana M. Cerdeira;Marco Mazzotti;Bruno A. Gander

  • Stabilizing insulin-like growth factor-I in poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.

    Lorenz Meinel;Oscar E. Illi;Jürgen Zapf;Marco Malfanti

  • Localized insulin-like growth factor I delivery to enhance new bone formation.

    Lorenz Meinel;Evangelos Zoidis;Jürgen Zapf;Paulo Hassa

  • Schwann cell delivery of neurotrophic factors for peripheral nerve regeneration

    Srinivas Madduri;Bruno A. Gander

  • Encapsulation of peptides in biodegradable microspheres prolongs their MHC class-I presentation by dendritic cells and macrophages in vitro.

    Régine Audran;Katrin Peter;Jens Dannull;Ying Men

  • Improving stability and release kinetics of microencapsulated tetanus toxoid by co-encapsulation of additives.

    Pål Johansen;Ying Men;Régine Audran;Giampietro Corradin

  • In vitro phagocytosis and monocyte-macrophage activation with poly(lactide) and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.

    Sandra Prior;Bruno Gander;Natalia Blarer;Hans Peter Merkle

Frequent Co-Authors

Giampietro Corradin
Giampietro Corradin University of Lausanne
Thomas M. Kündig
Thomas M. Kündig University of Zurich
Juan M. Irache
Juan M. Irache University of Navarra
Marcus Groettrup
Marcus Groettrup University of Konstanz
Carlos Gamazo
Carlos Gamazo University of Navarra
Marc Bohner
Marc Bohner RMS Foundation
Burkhard Ludewig
Burkhard Ludewig University of Zurich
Stefaan C. De Smedt
Stefaan C. De Smedt Ghent University
Zhihong Yang
Zhihong Yang University of Fribourg
Manuel Yúfera
Manuel Yúfera Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career pathways in healthcare and medical sciences. Many students opt for specialized programs that align with their interests and provide flexibility to study from anywhere. Allied health fields like radiology and medical assisting are in high demand, so online training opportunities are rapidly growing.

For those interested in imaging and diagnostics, 1 year radiology tech programs online offer a fast track into rewarding careers. If nutrition science is your passion, consider exploring the best dietetics masters programs available online, which can lead to roles in health promotion and clinical nutrition.

Financial assistance is often a crucial concern. Prospective students can look into financial aid for medical assistant programs to support their studies and lower out-of-pocket costs. For medical assistants seeking career advancement, the medical assistant to lpn bridge program online provides a pathway to higher qualifications and responsibilities in patient care.

Whether your goal is a quick-start clinical role or advanced specialization, exploring related online degrees can broaden your opportunities and help you reach your professional goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Gander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles