World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefano Geuna

Stefano Geuna

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
64
Citations
11951
World Ranking
3323
National Ranking
137

Stefano Geuna publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Geuna sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 351 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stefano Geuna D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Geuna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Chapter 3: Histology of the peripheral nerve and changes occurring during nerve regeneration.

    Stefano Geuna;Stefania Raimondo;Giulia Ronchi;Federica Di Scipio

  • Nerve repair by means of tubulization: Literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair

    Unknown

  • Phototherapy for enhancing peripheral nerve repair: a review of the literature.

    Davilene Gigo-Benato;Stefano Geuna;Shimon Rochkind

  • Oxidative Stress Triggers Cardiac Fibrosis in the Heart of Diabetic Rats

    Manuela Aragno;Raffaella Mastrocola;Giuseppe Alloatti;Ilenia Vercellinatto

  • Functional and morphological assessment of a standardized rat sciatic nerve crush injury with a non-serrated clamp

    Artur S.P. Varejão;António M. Cabrita;Marcel F. Meek;José Bulas-Cruz

  • Low-power laser biostimulation enhances nerve repair after end-to-side neurorrhaphy: a double-blind randomized study in the rat median nerve model

    D. Gigo-Benato;S. Geuna;A. de Castro Rodrigues;P. Tos

  • Acylated and unacylated ghrelin impair skeletal muscle atrophy in mice

    Paolo E. Porporato;Nicoletta Filigheddu;Simone Reano;Michele Ferrara

  • Phototherapy promotes regeneration and functional recovery of injured peripheral nerve.

    Juanita J. Anders;Stefano Geuna;Shimon Rochkind

  • Nerve repair by means of vein filled with muscle grafts I. Clinical results.

    Bruno Battiston;Pierluigi Tos;Timothy R. Cushway;Stefano Geuna

  • Chitosan-film enhanced chitosan nerve guides for long-distance regeneration of peripheral nerves

    Cora Meyer;Lena Stenberg;Francisco Gonzalez-Perez;Sandra Wrobel

  • The paradigm of postconditioning to protect the heart

    C. Penna;D. Mancardi;S. Raimondo;S. Geuna

  • A simple protocol for paraffin-embedded myelin sheath staining with osmium tetroxide for light microscope observation.

    Federica Di Scipio;Stefania Raimondo;Pierluigi Tos;Stefano Geuna

  • Chapter 5: Methods and protocols in peripheral nerve regeneration experimental research: part II-morphological techniques.

    Stefania Raimondo;Michele Fornaro;Federica Di Scipio;Giulia Ronchi

  • Chitosan tubes of varying degrees of acetylation for bridging peripheral nerve defects

    Kirsten Haastert-Talini;Stefano Geuna;Lars B. Dahlin;Cora Meyer

  • The sciatic nerve injury model in pre-clinical research

    Stefano Geuna

  • Long-term functional and morphological assessment of a standardized rat sciatic nerve crush injury with a non-serrated clamp.

    A.L. Luís;S. Amado;S. Geuna;J.M. Rodrigues

  • Use of hybrid chitosan membranes and N1E-115 cells for promoting nerve regeneration in an axonotmesis rat model.

    S. Amado;M.J. Simões;P.A.S. Armada da Silva;A.L. Luís

  • Chapter 25: Phototherapy in peripheral nerve injury: effects on muscle preservation and nerve regeneration.

    Shimon Rochkind;Stefano Geuna;Asher Shainberg

  • Electrical stimulation impairs early functional recovery and accentuates skeletal muscle atrophy after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats.

    Davilene Gigo-Benato;Thiago Luiz Russo;Stefano Geuna;Natalia Rezende Santa Rosa Domingues

  • On the use of the grasping test in the rat median nerve model: a re-appraisal of its efficacy for quantitative assessment of motor function recovery.

    Igor Papalia;Pierluigi Tos;Francesco Stagno d'Alcontres;Bruno Battiston

Frequent Co-Authors

José D. Santos
José D. Santos University of Porto
Gianluca Ciardelli
Gianluca Ciardelli Polytechnic University of Turin
Mauro Giacca
Mauro Giacca King's College London
Lorena Zentilin
Lorena Zentilin International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
Francesco Porpiglia
Francesco Porpiglia University of Turin
Xavier Navarro
Xavier Navarro Autonomous University of Barcelona
Gianmario Martra
Gianmario Martra University of Turin
Federica Cavallo
Federica Cavallo University of Turin
Alessandro Vercelli
Alessandro Vercelli University of Turin
Serena Zacchigna
Serena Zacchigna International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stefano Geuna

Recently Published Articles