World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 57 3444 3293 1 1 224 12037

Paulo Pereira publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paulo Pereira between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paulo Pereira published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 22.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2022. 55 of the 377 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2022. 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 23 publications
2009 2025

377 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paulo Pereira: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 4
2010 8
2011 7
2012 8
2013 10
2014 15
2015 13
2016 21
2017 24
2018 23
2019 16
2020 44
2021 36
2022 50
2023 43
2024 32
2025 23
Total 377
Download as CSV

Paulo Pereira publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo Pereira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 224 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263 224
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Paulo Pereira D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paulo Pereira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204 57
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Paulo Pereira is affiliated with Mykolas Romeris University in Lithuania and has an extensive publication record in the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their primary research focuses on global and planetary change, soil science, ecology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, as well as management, monitoring, policy, and law related to environmental topics.

The scientist's work frequently addresses important topics including:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Among the notable recent papers associated with this scientist are:

  • "Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: A systematic review," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Soil and Human Health: Current Status and Future Needs," 2020, Air Soil and Water Research
  • "Loess Plateau: from degradation to restoration," 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Future land-use changes and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem services: A review," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Future scenarios impact on land use change and habitat quality in Lithuania," 2021, Environmental Research

Paulo Pereira's frequent coauthors include Wenwu Zhao, Miguel Inácio, Igor Bogunović, Marius Kalinauskas, and Damià Barceló. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse range of studies within their expertise.

Their publications appear most commonly in the following venues:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • CATENA
  • Geography and sustainability
  • Agronomy
  • Journal of Environmental Management

Best Publications

  • Wildland fire ash: Production, composition and eco-hydro-geomorphic effects

    Merche B. Bodí;Merche B. Bodí;Deborah A. Martin;Victoria N. Balfour;Cristina Santín

  • Agricultural land systems importance for supporting food security and sustainable development goals: A systematic review.

    Cláudia M. Viana;Dulce Freire;Patrícia Abrantes;Jorge Rocha

  • Effects of soil management techniques on soil water erosion in apricot orchards

    Saskia Keesstra;Paulo Pereira;Paulo Pereira;Agata Novara;Eric C. Brevik

  • Soil ecosystem services, sustainability, valuation and management

    Paulo Pereira;Igor Bogunovic;Miriam Muñoz-Rojas;Miriam Muñoz-Rojas;Eric C. Brevik

  • Soil mapping, classification, and pedologic modeling: History and future directions

    Eric C. Brevik;Constanza Calzolari;Bradley A. Miller;Paulo Pereira

  • Recent regional climate cooling on the Antarctic Peninsula and associated impacts on the cryosphere.

    Marc Oliva;F. Navarro;F. Hrbáček;A. Hernández

  • Soil and Human Health: Current Status and Future Needs:

    Eric C Brevik;Lindsey Slaughter;Bal Ram Singh;Joshua J Steffan

  • Use of barley straw residues to avoid high erosion and runoff rates on persimmon plantations in Eastern Spain under low frequency–high magnitude simulated rainfall events

    Artemi Cerdà;Óscar González-Pelayo;Antonio Giménez-Morera;Antonio Jordán

  • Loess Plateau: from degradation to restoration.

    Yang Yu;Wenwu Zhao;Juan F. Martinez-Murillo;Paulo Pereira

  • Tillage management impacts on soil compaction, erosion and crop yield in Stagnosols (Croatia)

    Igor Bogunovic;Paulo Pereira;Ivica Kisic;Krunoslav Sajko

  • Future land-use changes and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem services: A review.

    Eduardo Gomes;Miguel Inácio;Katažyna Bogdzevič;Marius Kalinauskas

  • Fire severity effects on ash chemical composition and water-extractable elements

    Paulo Pereira;Xavier Úbeda;Deborah A. Martin

  • Effects of fire temperature on the physical and chemical characteristics of the ash from two plots of cork oak (Quercus suber)

    X. Úbeda;P. Pereira;L. Outeiro;D. A. Martin

  • Post-fire soil management

    Paulo Pereira;Marcos Francos;Eric C. Brevik;Xavier Ubeda

  • Future scenarios impact on land use change and habitat quality in Lithuania.

    Eduardo Gomes;Miguel Inácio;Katažyna Bogdzevič;Marius Kalinauskas

  • Modeling soil cation exchange capacity in multiple countries

    Yones Khaledian;Eric C. Brevik;Paulo Pereira;Artemi Cerdà

  • Modelling the Impacts of Wildfire on Ash Thickness in a Short-Term Period

    P. Pereira;A. Cerdà;X. Úbeda;J. Mataix-Solera

  • Climate change impacts on agricultural suitability and yield reduction in a Mediterranean region

    Sameh K. Abd-Elmabod;Miriam Muñoz-Rojas;Miriam Muñoz-Rojas;Antonio Jordán;Mariá Anaya-Romero

  • Spatial distribution of soil chemical properties in an organic farm in Croatia

    Igor Bogunovic;Paulo Pereira;Eric C. Brevik

  • Atmospheric BTEX concentrations in the vicinity of the crude oil refinery of the Baltic region

    Pranas Baltrėnas;Edita Baltrėnaitė;Vaida Šerevičienė;Paulo Pereira

  • Spatial models for monitoring the spatio-temporal evolution of ashes after fire – a case study of a burnt grassland in Lithuania

    P. Pereira;A. Cerdà;X. Úbeda;J. Mataix-Solera

  • Spatial distribution of heavy metals released from ashes after a wildfire

    Paulo Pereira;Xavier Úbeda

Frequent Co-Authors

Artemi Cerdà
Artemi Cerdà University of Valencia
Eric C. Brevik
Eric C. Brevik Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Antonio Jordán
Antonio Jordán University of Seville
Agata Novara
Agata Novara University of Palermo
Wenwu Zhao
Wenwu Zhao Beijing Normal University
Saskia Keesstra
Saskia Keesstra Wageningen University & Research
Marc Oliva
Marc Oliva University of Barcelona
Jorge Mataix-Solera
Jorge Mataix-Solera Miguel Hernandez University
Miriam Muñoz-Rojas
Miriam Muñoz-Rojas University of New South Wales
António Ferreira
António Ferreira Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Pursuing a dsw program can complement environmental studies by focusing on social work and community advocacy, critical for addressing environmental justice issues.

Those seeking flexible and budget-friendly options might consider a cheap online general studies degree, which allows students to tailor courses toward environmental topics without overwhelming costs.

For students weighing the difficulty of various programs, understanding the easiest bachelor degree to get can help identify paths that balance academic challenge with timely graduation, ideal for those eager to enter the workforce quickly.

Specialized fields like geology are closely related to environmental sciences. Exploring the best online geology degree programs can provide insight into earth processes and environmental concerns, offering strong career prospects in environmental consulting, resource management, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Paulo Pereira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles