World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
18308
World Ranking
14172
National Ranking
5975

David Chia publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chia sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 185 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David Chia D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Chia sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Chia is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Infectious Diseases.

The main topics addressed in Chia's work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Advanced Biosensing and Bioanalysis Techniques, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions, as well as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research and detection.

Chia's recent papers demonstrate an ongoing engagement with molecular diagnostics and cancer detection methodologies. Notable publications include:

  • The Liquid Biopsy Consortium: Challenges and opportunities for early cancer detection and monitoring, 2023, published in Cell Reports Medicine
  • Ultra-Short Circulating Tumor DNA (usctDNA) in Plasma and Saliva of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients, 2020, published in Cancers
  • Plasma contains ultrashort single-stranded DNA in addition to nucleosomal cell-free DNA, 2022, published in iScience
  • Electric Field-Induced Release and Measurement (EFIRM), 2020, published in Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
  • Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Blood and Saliva for Prediction of Response to Osimertinib and Disease Progression in EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma, 2021, published in Cancers

Frequent collaborators in Chia's research include David T. Wong, Jordan Cheng, Feng Li, Yong Kim, and Wei Fang.

Chia has published extensively in several scientific journals. The leading venues for their work are:

  • European Urology Open Science
  • Cancers
  • Biomarker Research
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
  • Frontiers in Oncology

Best Publications

  • Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial

    Gerald L. Andriole;E. David Crawford;Robert L. Grubb;Saundra S. Buys

  • Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Saundra S. Buys;Edward Partridge;Amanda Black;Christine C. Johnson

  • Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up

    Gerald L. Andriole;E. David Crawford;Robert L. Grubb;Saundra S. Buys

  • Design of the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial

    Philip C Prorok;Gerald L Andriole;Robert S. Bresalier;Saundra S Buys

  • α-Fetoprotein, Des-γ Carboxyprothrombin, and Lectin-Bound α-Fetoprotein in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Jorge A. Marrero;Ziding Feng;Yinghui Wang;Mindie H. Nguyen

  • Standard operating procedures for serum and plasma collection: early detection research network consensus statement standard operating procedure integration working group.

    Melissa K. Tuck;Daniel W. Chan;David Chia;Andrew K. Godwin

  • Variations of oral microbiota are associated with pancreatic diseases including pancreatic cancer

    James J Farrell;Lei Zhang;Hui Zhou;David Chia

  • Characterization of Sialosylated Lewisx as a New Tumor-associated Antigen

    Kiyoyasu Fukushima;Masaki Hirota;Paul I. Terasaki;Akemi Wakisaka

  • Global levels of histone modifications predict prognosis in different cancers.

    David B. Seligson;Steve Horvath;Matthew A. McBrian;Vei Mah

  • Ovarian cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: Findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial

    Saundra S. Buys;Edward Partridge;Mark H. Greene;Philip C. Prorok

  • Salivary transcriptomic biomarkers for detection of resectable pancreatic cancer.

    Lei Zhang;James J. Farrell;Hui Zhou;David Elashoff

  • Fibulin-3 as a Blood and Effusion Biomarker for Pleural Mesothelioma

    Harvey I. Pass;Stephen M. Levin;Michael R. Harbut;Jonathan Melamed

  • Discovery and preclinical validation of salivary transcriptomic and proteomic biomarkers for the non-invasive detection of breast cancer.

    Lei Zhang;Hua Xiao;Scott Karlan;Hui Zhou

  • Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings From the Initial Screening Round of a Randomized Trial

    Gerald L. Andriole;David L. Levin;E. David Crawford;Edward P. Gelmann

  • Role of Pancreatic Cancer-derived Exosomes in Salivary Biomarker Development

    Chang Lau;Yong Kim;David Chia;Nadine Spielmann

  • COX-2-dependent stabilization of survivin in non-small cell lung cancer

    Kostyantyn Krysan;Farrukh H. Merchant;Li Zhu;Mariam Dohadwala

  • A new microcellular cytotoxicity test based on calcein AM release.

    Xiu Ming Wang;Paul I. Terasaki;George W. Rankin;David Chia

  • Prevalidation of Salivary Biomarkers for Oral Cancer Detection

    David Elashoff;Hui Zhou;Jean Reiss;Jianghua Wang

  • MCT1 Modulates Cancer Cell Pyruvate Export and Growth of Tumors that Co-express MCT1 and MCT4.

    Candice Sun Hong;Nicholas A. Graham;Wen Gu;Carolina Espindola Camacho

  • Higher levels of GATA3 predict better survival in women with breast cancer

    Nam K. Yoon;Erin L. Maresh;Dejun Shen;Yahya Elshimali

Frequent Co-Authors

David T.W. Wong
David T.W. Wong University of California, Los Angeles
Steve Horvath
Steve Horvath University of California, Los Angeles
Paul I. Terasaki
Paul I. Terasaki University of California, Los Angeles
David Elashoff
David Elashoff University of California, Los Angeles
Paul F. Pinsky
Paul F. Pinsky National Institutes of Health
Barnett S. Kramer
Barnett S. Kramer National Institutes of Health
E. David Crawford
E. David Crawford University of California, San Diego
Steven M. Dubinett
Steven M. Dubinett University of California, Los Angeles
Edward P. Gelmann
Edward P. Gelmann University of Arizona
Gerald L. Andriole
Gerald L. Andriole Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, you have access to a wide range of online degree options and rewarding career pathways in healthcare and medical technology. One rapidly growing field is health information management, which offers flexible learning through health information management schools online. These programs prepare you for roles that blend science, technology, and patient care.

Another popular pathway is medical billing and coding. The medical billing and coding outlook is quite positive, with rising demand for skilled professionals. Many students interested in these careers pursue credentials such as cpc certification, which can increase job prospects and earning potential.

Wondering about salaries? You can learn more about how much do medical coders make and find guidance on entering the field. With an online degree in a health-related discipline, you can open doors to essential roles that support patient care and healthcare systems nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing David Chia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles