World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
129
Citations
68271
World Ranking
2572
National Ranking
265

David E. Neal publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Neal sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 992 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David E. Neal D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Neal sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 129 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Neal is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions in subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Oncology, Molecular Biology, and Surgery.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David E. Neal include:

  • Freddie C. Hamdy
  • Jenny Donovan
  • Richard M. Martin
  • Johanna Schleutker
  • Rosalind A. Eeles

Common publication venues where their research appears are:

  • The Prostate
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Genetics
  • Nature Communications

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by David E. Neal include:

  • Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • An integrative multi-omics analysis to identify candidate DNA methylation biomarkers related to prostate cancer risk, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Characterizing prostate cancer risk through multi-ancestry genome-wide discovery of 187 novel risk variants, 2023, Nature Genetics
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between body mass index, prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, and prostate-specific antigen, 2020, Cancer Causes & Control

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

    Freddie C. Hamdy;Jenny L. Donovan;J. Athene Lane;Malcolm Mason

  • The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer.

    Gunes Gundem;Peter Van Loo;Peter Van Loo;Peter Van Loo;Barbara Kremeyer;Ludmil B. Alexandrov

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

    Donovan Jl;Hamdy Fc;Lane Ja;Mason M

  • CD133, a novel marker for human prostatic epithelial stem cells

    Gavin D. Richardson;Craig N. Robson;Shona H. Lang;David E. Neal

  • Multiple newly identified loci associated with prostate cancer susceptibility.

    Rosalind A Eeles;Rosalind A Eeles;Zsofia Kote-Jarai;Graham G Giles;Graham G Giles;Ali Amin Al Olama

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci

    Fredrick R. Schumacher;Ali Amin Al Olama;Sonja I. Berndt;Sara Benlloch

  • Epidermal-growth-factor receptors in human bladder cancer: comparison of invasive and superficial tumours.

    DavidE. Neal;DavidE. Neal;MarkK. Bennett;MarkK. Bennett;ReginaldR. Hall;ReginaldR. Hall;Colin Marsh;Colin Marsh

  • Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.

    Jenny Donovan;Nicola Mills;Monica Smith;Lucy Brindle

  • Upregulation and Nuclear Recruitment of HDAC1 in Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer

    Kalipso Halkidou;Luke Gaughan;Susan Cook;Hing Y. Leung

  • The androgen receptor fuels prostate cancer by regulating central metabolism and biosynthesis

    Charles E Massie;Andy Lynch;Antonio Ramos-Montoya;Joan Boren

  • Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array

    Rosalind A. Eeles;Ali Amin Al Olama;Sara Benlloch;Edward J. Saunders

  • Levels of Matrix Metalloproteases in Bladder Cancer Correlate with Tumor Grade and Invasion

    Bernard Davies;Jonathan Waxman;Harpret Wasan;Paul Abel

  • A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice.

    M.H. Khadra;R.S. Pickard;M. Charlton;P.H. Powell

  • A meta-analysis of 87,040 individuals identifies 23 new susceptibility loci for prostate cancer

    Ali Amin Al Olama;Zsofia Kote-Jarai;Sonja I. Berndt;David V. Conti

  • Overexpression of LSD1 contributes to human carcinogenesis through chromatin regulation in various cancers.

    Shinya Hayami;John D. Kelly;Hyun Soo Cho;Masanori Yoshimatsu

  • Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer

    Paul C. Boutros;Paul C. Boutros;Michael Fraser;Nicholas J. Harding;Richard De Borja

  • Identification and isolation of human prostate epithelial stem cells based on α2β1-integrin expression

    Anne T. Collins;Fouad K. Habib;Norman J. Maitland;David E. Neal

  • The evolutionary history of lethal metastatic prostate cancer

    G Gundem;P Van Loo;B Kremeyer;L B Alexandrov

Frequent Co-Authors

Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
Richard M. Martin
Richard M. Martin University of Bristol
Rosalind A. Eeles
Rosalind A. Eeles Institute of Cancer Research
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Kenneth W. Muir
Kenneth W. Muir University of Manchester
Zsofia Kote-Jarai
Zsofia Kote-Jarai Institute of Cancer Research
Ian G. Mills
Ian G. Mills University of Oxford
Johanna Schleutker
Johanna Schleutker Turku University Hospital
Lisa A. Cannon-Albright
Lisa A. Cannon-Albright University of Utah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a medical career but want more flexible study options, numerous online degrees can set you on the right path. Nursing continues to be a leading choice, thanks to a growing demand for qualified professionals and a variety of online pathways that suit different educational backgrounds.

For those starting out, online nursing courses can provide essential foundations and prepare you for further study or entry-level roles in healthcare. Licensed nurses who wish to expand their qualifications and advance in their careers may consider accredited rn to bsn online programs for enhanced job opportunities.

If your aim is to practice at an advanced level, explore the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs, which combine affordability with recognized credentials. Those interested in research, education, or leadership roles can opt for an online nursing doctorate, opening doors to the highest levels of professional practice.

These online degrees and pathways allow students to balance their studies with other commitments, making medical education in the USA more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Neal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles