World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
20453
World Ranking
6242
National Ranking
478

Ian G. Mills publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian G. Mills sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 431 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ian G. Mills D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian G. Mills sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian G. Mills is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, where their research focuses primarily on medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work integrates multiple subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, molecular biology, cancer research, oncology, and genetics. This interdisciplinary approach supports investigations into complex biological mechanisms and disease processes.

The scientist has published extensively in topics related to prostate cancer treatment and research, prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, cancer lipids and metabolism, cancer genomics and diagnostics, genetic associations and epidemiology, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, as well as cancer hypoxia and metabolism. These thematic areas highlight a focus on understanding cancer at molecular and clinical levels, particularly prostate cancer.

Ian G. Mills has contributed to numerous academic papers, among which recent publications include:

  • Spatially resolved clonal copy number alterations in benign and malignant tissue (2022, Nature)
  • Vascular normalisation as the stepping stone into tumour microenvironment transformation (2021, British Journal of Cancer)
  • Single-cell ATAC and RNA sequencing reveal pre-existing and persistent cells associated with prostate cancer relapse (2021, Nature Communications)
  • ELOVL5 Is a Critical and Targetable Fatty Acid Elongase in Prostate Cancer (2021, Cancer Research)
  • Impacts of combining anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy and radiotherapy on the tumour immune microenvironment in a murine prostate cancer model (2020, British Journal of Cancer)

The scientist frequently collaborates with several co-authors, notably Freddie C. Hamdy, Alastair Lamb, Dan J. Woodcock, Andrew Erickson, and Richard J. Bryant. These collaborations reflect ongoing partnerships within the cancer research community, contributing to a sustained output of peer-reviewed articles.

Publishing venues where Ian G. Mills has contributed with multiple articles include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • Nature Communications
  • European Urology Open Science
  • The Journal of Urology

The scientific output reveals a strong orientation toward cancer biology and medical research, supported by molecular and genetic biology methodologies. Their research addresses critical questions in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and the underlying molecular mechanisms. The breadth and depth of their publications indicate ongoing engagement with the evolving landscape of oncology research.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure

    Brian J. Peter;Helen M. Kent;Ian G. Mills;T. Yvonne Vallis

  • Curvature of clathrin-coated pits driven by epsin

    Marijn G. J. Ford;Ian G. Mills;Brian J. Peter;Yvonne Vallis

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • The androgen receptor fuels prostate cancer by regulating central metabolism and biosynthesis

    Charles E Massie;Andy Lynch;Antonio Ramos-Montoya;Joan Boren

  • GTPase activity of dynamin and resulting conformation change are essential for endocytosis.

    Bruno Marks;Michael H. B. Stowell;Yvonne Vallis;Ian G. Mills

  • Principles for the post-GWAS functional characterization of cancer risk loci

    Matthew L Freedman;Alvaro N A Monteiro;Simon A Gayther;Simon A Gayther;Gerhard A Coetzee

  • The Androgen Receptor Induces a Distinct Transcriptional Program in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Man

    Naomi L. Sharma;Charlie E. Massie;Antonio Ramos-Montoya;Vincent Zecchini

  • ER stress–mediated autophagy promotes Myc-dependent transformation and tumor growth

    Lori S. Hart;John T. Cunningham;Tatini Datta;Souvik Dey

  • COP and clathrin-coated vesicle budding: different pathways, common approaches.

    Harvey T McMahon;Ian G Mills

  • Androgen receptor driven transcription in molecular apocrine breast cancer is mediated by FoxA1

    Jessica L L Robinson;Stewart MacArthur;Caryn S Ross‐Innes;Wayne D Tilley

  • New androgen receptor genomic targets show an interaction with the ETS1 transcription factor.

    Charles E Massie;Boris Adryan;Nuno L. Barbosa-Morais;Andy G. Lynch

  • Integration of copy number and transcriptomics provides risk stratification in prostate cancer: A discovery and validation cohort study

    H Ross-Adams;A D Lamb;M J Dunning;S Halim

  • Role of the AP2 beta-appendage hub in recruiting partners for clathrin-coated vesicle assembly.

    Eva M Schmid;Marijn G. J Ford;Anne Burtey;Gerrit J. K Praefcke

  • O-GlcNAc transferase integrates metabolic pathways to regulate the stability of c-MYC in human prostate cancer cells

    Harri Mikael Itkonen;Sarah Minner;Ingrid J Guldvik;Mareike Julia Sandmann

  • Structural basis for the nuclear import of the human androgen receptor.

    Mark L. Cutress;Hayley C. Whitaker;Ian G. Mills;Murray Stewart

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • EpsinR: an AP1/clathrin interacting protein involved in vesicle trafficking.

    Ian G. Mills;Gerrit J.K. Praefcke;Yvonne Vallis;Brian J. Peter

  • Involvement of the endosomal autoantigen EEA1 in homotypic fusion of early endosomes

    Ian G. Mills;Arwyn T. Jones;Michael J. Clague

  • Clathrin Adaptor epsinR Is Required for Retrograde Sorting on Early Endosomal Membranes

    Agnès Saint-Pol;Belén Yélamos;Mohamed Amessou;Ian G Mills

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Neal
David E. Neal University of Cambridge
Ole A. Andreassen
Ole A. Andreassen Oslo University Hospital
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
Kenneth W. Muir
Kenneth W. Muir University of Manchester
Henrik Grönberg
Henrik Grönberg Karolinska Institute
Rosalind A. Eeles
Rosalind A. Eeles Institute of Cancer Research
Johanna Schleutker
Johanna Schleutker Turku University Hospital
Jyotsna Batra
Jyotsna Batra Queensland University of Technology
Wesley K. Thompson
Wesley K. Thompson University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring degrees in Biology or Biochemistry, you may also be interested in healthcare careers like medical coding and health information management. These fields offer a blend of science, technology, and administrative skills, ideal for those interested in the healthcare industry but not direct patient care.

Choosing between medical coding certification options such as CPC vs. CCS can impact your salary, job opportunities, and work settings. For those considering entry into this profession, understanding the certified medical coder salary is crucial—salaries may vary depending on credentials, experience, and location.

It’s also helpful to weigh the pros and cons to determine is medical billing and coding worth it for your career goals. Alternatively, earning a degree in health information management may open additional doors. For a flexible start, consider a him degree through an affordable online program to launch your career in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Ian G. Mills

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles