World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 44 4134 3816 1968 1785 198 8498

Edward J. Latessa publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edward J. Latessa between 1979 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edward J. Latessa published across 43 years, from 1979 to 2021, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2012. 14 of the 201 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2012. 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 2 publications
1979 2021

201 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edward J. Latessa: publications per year, 1979 to 2021
Year Publications
1979 2
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 1
1985 1
1986 0
1987 2
1988 3
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 3
1993 4
1994 2
1995 0
1996 1
1997 4
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 6
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 7
2007 5
2008 7
2009 10
2010 9
2011 16
2012 22
2013 7
2014 22
2015 2
2016 5
2017 5
2018 8
2019 12
2020 12
2021 2
Total 201
Download as CSV

Edward J. Latessa publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward J. Latessa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 198 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 198
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Edward J. Latessa D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward J. Latessa sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269 44
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Edward J. Latessa is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a focus on the subfields of Sociology and Political Science as well as Clinical Psychology.

Their scholarly work covers topics such as Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis, Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending, and Crime Patterns and Interventions. These areas reflect a concentration on issues related to criminal justice systems, offender behavior, and intervention strategies.

Among the recent publications attributed to Edward J. Latessa is the 2020 paper titled Progressing policy toward a risk/need informed sanctioning model, which appeared in Criminology & Public Policy. This paper is one example of the contributions they have made to academic discourse in criminal justice policy.

  • Progressing policy toward a risk/need informed sanctioning model, 2020, Criminology & Public Policy

Edward J. Latessa has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including Christopher T. Lowenkamp, Christopher D'Amato, Ian A. Silver, and Jamie Newsome. These partnerships are part of their broader engagement with research in correctional policy and offender rehabilitation.

  • Christopher T. Lowenkamp
  • Christopher D'Amato
  • Ian A. Silver
  • Jamie Newsome

In addition to journal articles, Edward J. Latessa has contributed to book publications. Notably, they authored What Works in Reducing Recidivism, published in 2020 by the University of St. Thomas - Minnesota. This work has been cited multiple times, indicating its role in ongoing academic discussion concerning recidivism reduction strategies.

  • University of St. Thomas - Minnesota: 1 book publication

Their work is published primarily in venues associated with criminology and public policy, with Criminology & Public Policy cited as a notable publication venue where their research has appeared.

  • Criminology & Public Policy

Best Publications

  • The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs?

    Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Edward J. Latessa;Alexander M. Holsinger

  • DOES CORRECTIONAL PROGRAM QUALITY REALLY MATTER? THE IMPACT OF ADHERING TO THE PRINCIPLES OF EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION*

    Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Edward J. Latessa;Paula Smith

  • Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention

    Robert L. Listenbee;Lesli Blair;Carrie Sullivan;Christopher J. Sullivan

  • INCREASING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMMING THROUGH THE RISK PRINCIPLE: IDENTIFYING OFFENDERS FOR RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENT*

    Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Edward J. Latessa

  • Can 14,737 women be wrong? A meta‐analysis of the LSI‐R and recidivism for female offenders*

    Paula Smith;Francis T. Cullen;Edward J. Latessa

  • Risk/Need Assessment, Offender Classification, and the Role of Childhood Abuse

    Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Alexander M. Holsinger;Edward J. Latessa

  • THE CORRECTIONAL ORIENTATION OF PRISON WARDENS: IS THE REHABILITATIVE IDEAL SUPPORTED?*

    Francis T. Cullen;Edward J. Latessa;Velmer S. Burton;Lucien X. Lombardo

  • What Works in Reducing Recidivism

    Edward J. Latessa Ph.D.;Christopher Lowenkamp Ph.D.

  • Probation officers' roles in intensive supervision: Surveillance versus treatment

    Todd R. Clear;Edward J. Latessa

  • Corrections in the Community

    Edward J. Latessa;Paula Smith

  • The Role of Offender Risk Assessment: A Policy Maker Guide

    Edward J. Latessa;Brian Lovins

  • The Effect of Drug Court Programming on Recidivism: the Cincinnati Experience

    Shelley Johnson Listwan;Jody L. Sundt;Alexander M. Holsinger;Edward J. Latessa

  • THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGE: CORRECTIONAL PROGRAMS AND EVIDENCE‐BASED PRACTICES

    Edward J. Latessa

  • Improving probation officers' supervision skills: an evaluation of the EPICS model

    Paula Smith;Myrinda Schweitzer;Ryan M. Labrecque;Edward J. Latessa

  • Predicting outcome with the Level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity

    Anthony W. Flores;Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Alexander M. Holsinger;Edward J. Latessa

  • What Works (and Doesn't) in Reducing Recidivism

    Edward J. Latessa;Shelley Johnson Listwan;Deborah Koetzle

  • Applying the Risk Principle to Sex Offenders Can Treatment Make Some Sex Offenders Worse

    Brian Lovins;Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Edward J. Latessa

  • Exploring the validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised with Native American offenders.

    Alexander M. Holsinger;Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Edward J. Latessa

  • Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter?☆

    Christopher T. Lowenkamp;Anthony W. Flores;Alexander M. Holsinger;Matthew D. Makarios

  • Examining the Interaction between Level of Risk and Dosage of Treatment

    Kimberly Gentry Sperber;Edward J. Latessa;Matthew D. Makarios

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher T. Lowenkamp
Christopher T. Lowenkamp University of Missouri–Kansas City
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati
Travis C. Pratt
Travis C. Pratt University of Cincinnati
John Wooldredge
John Wooldredge University of Cincinnati
Brandon K. Applegate
Brandon K. Applegate University of South Carolina
Todd R. Clear
Todd R. Clear Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Michael L. Benson
Michael L. Benson University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open diverse career pathways in fields like counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Today, flexibility and affordability are top priorities for many students seeking advanced education, making accredited online programs increasingly popular.

If you are interested in becoming a licensed professional counselor, consider reviewing cacrep accredited online counseling programs, which ensure the quality and recognition you need for state licensure. Likewise, careers in family therapy are accessible through online mft programs accredited by respected organizations, meeting professional standards and preparing graduates for certification.

For those drawn to psychological research or practice, finding the cheapest online psychology degree can make higher education more accessible while helping minimize student debt. If social work is your passion, look into the easiest msw online program options, which offer inclusive admissions and support for those eager to make a difference in communities.

These online opportunities allow you to balance study, work, and family responsibilities as you advance your career, making a meaningful impact while investing in your future.

Best Scientists Citing Edward J. Latessa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles