World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
51007
World Ranking
7535
National Ranking
735

Richard M. Martin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Martin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,028 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard M. Martin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Martin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Martin is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection.

Recent publications reflect diverse interests, with selected papers including:

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Circulating inflammatory cytokines and risk of five cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis, 2022, BMC Medicine
  • Insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3, and breast cancer risk: observational and Mendelian randomization analyses with ∼430 000 women, 2020, Annals of Oncology

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Marc J. Gunter
  • Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
  • George Davey Smith
  • James Yarmolinsky
  • Sarah J. Lewis

Publication venues where the researcher has contributed multiple works include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • International Journal of Epidemiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome

    Gibran Hemani;Jie Zheng;Benjamin Elsworth;Kaitlin H Wade

  • 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

    Freddie C. Hamdy;Jenny L. Donovan;J. Athene Lane;Malcolm Mason

  • Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

    Lesley Wood;Matthias Egger;Lise Lotte Gluud;Kenneth F Schulz

  • Effect of Infant Feeding on the Risk of Obesity Across the Life Course: A Quantitative Review of Published Evidence

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey Smith

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

    Donovan Jl;Hamdy Fc;Lane Ja;Mason M

  • Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci

    Fredrick R. Schumacher;Ali Amin Al Olama;Sonja I. Berndt;Sara Benlloch

  • Does breastfeeding influence risk of type 2 diabetes in later life? A quantitative analysis of published evidence

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey Smith

  • Obesity, metabolic factors and risk of different histological types of lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

    Robert Carreras-Torres;Mattias Johansson;Philip C. Haycock;Kaitlin H. Wade

  • The effect of breastfeeding on mean body mass index throughout life: a quantitative review of published and unpublished observational evidence

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey-Smith

  • How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?

    Mary S Fewtrell;Kathy Kennedy;Atul Singhal;Richard M Martin

  • Effects of prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding on child height, weight, adiposity, and blood pressure at age 6.5 y: evidence from a large randomized trial.

    Michael S Kramer;Lidia Matush;Irina Vanilovich;Robert W Platt

  • Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases A Mendelian Randomization Study

    Philip C Haycock;Stephen Burgess;Aayah Nounu

  • Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial

    Richard M. Martin;Richard M. Martin;Jenny L. Donovan;Jenny L. Donovan;Emma L Turner;Chris Metcalfe

  • Breastfeeding in Infancy and Blood Pressure in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Richard M. Martin;David Gunnell;George Davey Smith

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer : a Mendelian randomisation analysis

    Nikos Papadimitriou;Niki Dimou;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Barbara Banbury

  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction

    David V. Conti;Burcu F. Darst;Lilit C. Moss;Edward J. Saunders

  • Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975–2004: an ecological study

    Simon M Collin;Richard M Martin;Chris Metcalfe;David Gunnell

  • Does initial breastfeeding lead to lower blood cholesterol in adult life? A quantitative review of the evidence

    Christopher G. Owen;Peter H. Whincup;Samantha J. Kaye;Richard M. Martin

  • Circulating insulin‐like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Mari-Anne Rowlands;David Gunnell;Ross Harris;Lars J. Vatten;Lars J. Vatten

  • The effect of breastfeeding on mean body mass index throughout life: a quantitative review of published and unpublished

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Neal
David E. Neal University of Cambridge
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
Neil M Davies
Neil M Davies University College London
Michael S. Kramer
Michael S. Kramer McGill University
Kate Tilling
Kate Tilling University of Bristol
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Jeffrey M P Holly
Jeffrey M P Holly University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For aspiring and current medical professionals, many flexible online opportunities can streamline your education or help advance your career in healthcare. Accelerated pathways are becoming more popular, especially for those balancing work, family, and studies.

Registered nurses seeking a bachelor’s degree may consider rn to bsn online programs without clinicals. These programs allow RNs to upgrade their qualifications without the need for additional in-person clinical requirements, perfect for busy professionals.

If you’re aiming for advanced practice, the online dnp programs offer a faster route to the Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Some candidates prefer options like dnp programs without dissertation, removing a significant research hurdle and focusing more on practical expertise.

Those looking to start their nursing career quickly might explore lpn programs online, which can lead to entry-level roles in a matter of months. These pathways provide flexibility, letting you tailor your education to your goals while keeping up with personal and professional responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles