World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 102 7534 7080 732 698 1028 51007

Richard M. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard M. Martin between 1950 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard M. Martin published across 76 years, from 1950 to 2025, averaging 17.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 391 publications in 2023. 112 of the 1,309 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 391. Peak 391 publications in 2023. 1950: 3 publications 1951: 3 publications 1952: 1 publication 1953: 2 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 1 publication 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 3 publications 1960: 6 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 4 publications 1963: 7 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 4 publications 1967: 2 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 4 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 11 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 15 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 22 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 34 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 47 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 42 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 51 publications 2022: 43 publications 2023: 391 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 76 publications
1950 2025

1,309 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard M. Martin: publications per year, 1950 to 2025
Year Publications
1950 3
1951 3
1952 1
1953 2
1954 0
1955 1
1956 0
1957 0
1958 1
1959 3
1960 6
1961 0
1962 4
1963 7
1964 4
1965 1
1966 4
1967 2
1968 1
1969 0
1970 1
1971 1
1972 4
1973 1
1974 11
1975 2
1976 2
1977 4
1978 6
1979 15
1980 4
1981 4
1982 4
1983 2
1984 2
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 0
1991 1
1992 22
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 7
1998 10
1999 6
2000 2
2001 4
2002 6
2003 2
2004 9
2005 15
2006 12
2007 15
2008 17
2009 39
2010 28
2011 43
2012 20
2013 34
2014 33
2015 39
2016 47
2017 40
2018 47
2019 42
2020 52
2021 51
2022 43
2023 391
2024 36
2025 76
Total 1,309
Download as CSV

Richard M. Martin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,021–1,040 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,028 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70 1,028
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard M. Martin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 102
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard M. Martin is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on several subfields including Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research, Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research, Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection.

Recent publications reflect diverse interests, with selected papers including:

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer: a Mendelian randomisation analysis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Circulating inflammatory cytokines and risk of five cancers: a Mendelian randomization analysis, 2022, BMC Medicine
  • Insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3, and breast cancer risk: observational and Mendelian randomization analyses with ∼430 000 women, 2020, Annals of Oncology

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Marc J. Gunter
  • Konstantinos K. Tsilidis
  • George Davey Smith
  • James Yarmolinsky
  • Sarah J. Lewis

Publication venues where the researcher has contributed multiple works include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • International Journal of Epidemiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome

    Gibran Hemani;Jie Zheng;Benjamin Elsworth;Kaitlin H Wade

  • 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

    Freddie C. Hamdy;Jenny L. Donovan;J. Athene Lane;Malcolm Mason

  • Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.

    Lesley Wood;Matthias Egger;Lise Lotte Gluud;Kenneth F Schulz

  • Effect of Infant Feeding on the Risk of Obesity Across the Life Course: A Quantitative Review of Published Evidence

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey Smith

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

    Donovan Jl;Hamdy Fc;Lane Ja;Mason M

  • Association analyses of more than 140,000 men identify 63 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci

    Fredrick R. Schumacher;Ali Amin Al Olama;Sonja I. Berndt;Sara Benlloch

  • Does breastfeeding influence risk of type 2 diabetes in later life? A quantitative analysis of published evidence

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey Smith

  • Obesity, metabolic factors and risk of different histological types of lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

    Robert Carreras-Torres;Mattias Johansson;Philip C. Haycock;Kaitlin H. Wade

  • The effect of breastfeeding on mean body mass index throughout life: a quantitative review of published and unpublished observational evidence

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey-Smith

  • How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies?

    Mary S Fewtrell;Kathy Kennedy;Atul Singhal;Richard M Martin

  • Effects of prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding on child height, weight, adiposity, and blood pressure at age 6.5 y: evidence from a large randomized trial.

    Michael S Kramer;Lidia Matush;Irina Vanilovich;Robert W Platt

  • Association Between Telomere Length and Risk of Cancer and Non-Neoplastic Diseases A Mendelian Randomization Study

    Philip C Haycock;Stephen Burgess;Aayah Nounu

  • Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial

    Richard M. Martin;Richard M. Martin;Jenny L. Donovan;Jenny L. Donovan;Emma L Turner;Chris Metcalfe

  • Breastfeeding in Infancy and Blood Pressure in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Richard M. Martin;David Gunnell;George Davey Smith

  • Physical activity and risks of breast and colorectal cancer : a Mendelian randomisation analysis

    Nikos Papadimitriou;Niki Dimou;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Konstantinos K. Tsilidis;Barbara Banbury

  • Trans-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of prostate cancer identifies new susceptibility loci and informs genetic risk prediction

    David V. Conti;Burcu F. Darst;Lilit C. Moss;Edward J. Saunders

  • Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975–2004: an ecological study

    Simon M Collin;Richard M Martin;Chris Metcalfe;David Gunnell

  • Does initial breastfeeding lead to lower blood cholesterol in adult life? A quantitative review of the evidence

    Christopher G. Owen;Peter H. Whincup;Samantha J. Kaye;Richard M. Martin

  • Circulating insulin‐like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Mari-Anne Rowlands;David Gunnell;Ross Harris;Lars J. Vatten;Lars J. Vatten

  • The effect of breastfeeding on mean body mass index throughout life: a quantitative review of published and unpublished

    Christopher G Owen;Richard M Martin;Peter H Whincup;George Davey-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Neal
David E. Neal University of Cambridge
Jenny L Donovan
Jenny L Donovan University of Bristol
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
David Gunnell
David Gunnell University of Bristol
Neil M Davies
Neil M Davies University College London
Michael S. Kramer
Michael S. Kramer McGill University
Kate Tilling
Kate Tilling University of Bristol
Graham G. Giles
Graham G. Giles University of Melbourne
Jeffrey M P Holly
Jeffrey M P Holly University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For aspiring and current medical professionals, many flexible online opportunities can streamline your education or help advance your career in healthcare. Accelerated pathways are becoming more popular, especially for those balancing work, family, and studies.

Registered nurses seeking a bachelor’s degree may consider rn to bsn online programs without clinicals. These programs allow RNs to upgrade their qualifications without the need for additional in-person clinical requirements, perfect for busy professionals.

If you’re aiming for advanced practice, the online dnp programs offer a faster route to the Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Some candidates prefer options like dnp programs without dissertation, removing a significant research hurdle and focusing more on practical expertise.

Those looking to start their nursing career quickly might explore lpn programs online, which can lead to entry-level roles in a matter of months. These pathways provide flexibility, letting you tailor your education to your goals while keeping up with personal and professional responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles