World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
76241
World Ranking
6878
National Ranking
665

Kate Tilling publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Tilling sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 685 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kate Tilling D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Tilling sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kate Tilling is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with extensive publications in related subfields including Genetics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist has contributed to several key topics in health and epidemiology, such as:

  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Tilling's recent impactful papers include:

  • "Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records," 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • "A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)," 2024, published in Environment International
  • "Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts," 2020, published in The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Use of genetic variation to separate the effects of early and later life adiposity on disease risk: mendelian randomisation study," 2020, published in BMJ

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kate Tilling include:

  • George Davey Smith
  • Debbie A. Lawlor
  • Rachael A. Hughes
  • Alex S. F. Kwong
  • Jon Heron

Their research has appeared repeatedly in prominent publication venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 79 publications
  • International Journal of Epidemiology with 15 publications
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology with 9 publications
  • European Journal of Epidemiology with 8 publications
  • American Journal of Epidemiology with 7 publications

Best Publications

  • RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

    Jonathan A.C. Sterne;Jelena Savović;Jelena Savović;Matthew J. Page;Roy G. Elbers

  • Cohort Profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort

    Abigail Fraser;Corrie Macdonald-Wallis;Kate Tilling;Andy Boyd

  • Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data.

    Gibran Hemani;Kate Tilling;George Davey Smith

  • Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies.

    Richard M. Dodds;Holly E. Syddall;Rachel Cooper;Michaela Benzeval

  • Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology.

    Debbie A Lawlor;Kate Tilling;George Davey Smith

  • The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation.

    Paul Madley-Dowd;Rachael Hughes;Kate Tilling;Jon Heron

  • Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Long-term effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy in preventing AIDS and death: a prospective cohort study.

    Jonathan A C Sterne;Miguel A Hernán;Bruno Ledergerber;Kate Tilling

  • Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity

    Chris J Riddoch;Calum Mattocks;Kevin Deere;Jo Saunders

  • Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity

    Gareth J. Griffith;Tim T. Morris;Matthew J. Tudball;Annie Herbert

  • Association of maternal weight gain in pregnancy with offspring obesity and metabolic and vascular traits in childhood.

    Abigail Fraser;Kate Tilling;Corrie Macdonald-Wallis;Naveed Sattar

  • Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Fat Mass in a Large Cohort of Children

    Andy R Ness;Sam D Leary;Calum Mattocks;Steven N Blair

  • HHS Public Access

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): an update on the enrolled sample of index children in 2019.

    Kate Northstone;Melanie Lewcock;Alix Groom;Andrew Boyd

  • Association between diabetes and stroke subtype on survival and functional outcome 3 months after stroke: data from the European BIOMED Stroke Project.

    Salah-Eddine Megherbi;Chantal Milan;Dominique Minier;Grégory Couvreur

  • Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts.

    Alex S F Kwong;Rebecca M Pearson;Mark J Adams;Kate Northstone

  • Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification.

    Paul G. Ursell;David J. Spalton;Milind V. Pande;Emma J. Hollick

  • The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsular opacification 3 years after cataract surgery.

    Emma J Hollick;David J Spalton;Paul G Ursell;Milind V Pande

  • Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision.

    Calum Mattocks;Andy Ness;Sam Leary;Kate Tilling

  • Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity

    Gareth J Griffith;Tim T Morris;Matt Tudball;Annie Herbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
Richard M. Martin
Richard M. Martin University of Bristol
Jonathan A C Sterne
Jonathan A C Sterne University of Bristol
Charles D.A. Wolfe
Charles D.A. Wolfe King's College London
Jon Heron
Jon Heron University of Bristol
Andy R Ness
Andy R Ness University of Bristol
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Yoav Ben-Shlomo University of Bristol
Scott M. Nelson
Scott M. Nelson University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up a variety of career pathways through flexible online learning. Many students start their healthcare journey with specialized certifications, such as a medical coding certification cost program. These affordable courses provide foundational skills and can quickly lead to entry-level roles.

As you advance, registered nurses often consider online education to enhance their credentials. Those comparing degree costs may find that the cheapest online bsn programs offer substantial savings while maintaining high standards. RN-to-BSN track options make career growth more accessible.

For nurses aspiring to become independent practitioners, investing in the most affordable nurse practitioner programs online can help balance quality education with manageable expenses. Likewise, experienced nurses wanting leadership positions may consider the cheapest dnp programs online to reach top clinical and academic roles.

By choosing cost-effective online options, you can build a rewarding medical career without taking on excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Kate Tilling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles