World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6877 6466 662 632 685 76241

Kate Tilling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kate Tilling between 1975 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kate Tilling published across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026, averaging 14.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2021. 30 of the 773 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2021. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 32 publications 2015: 55 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 49 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 61 publications 2020: 36 publications 2021: 62 publications 2022: 62 publications 2023: 53 publications 2024: 52 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 4 publications
1975 2026

773 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kate Tilling: publications per year, 1975 to 2026
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 4
1997 8
1998 8
1999 9
2000 4
2001 14
2002 8
2003 5
2004 7
2005 17
2006 4
2007 10
2008 9
2009 14
2010 15
2011 23
2012 19
2013 25
2014 32
2015 55
2016 40
2017 49
2018 37
2019 61
2020 36
2021 62
2022 62
2023 53
2024 52
2025 26
2026 4
Total 773
Download as CSV

Kate Tilling publications per year - data summary

  • Kate Tilling, a Medicine scholar from University of Bristol, has 773 publications recorded across 52 years, from 1975 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1975 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2021 and 2022, with 62 publications each.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1975, with 1 publication.
  • 20 of the 52 years in the span carry no publications at all (1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 14.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 24.2 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 197 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1975-1992: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1993-2010: 136 publications (7.6 per year); 2011-2026: 636 publications (39.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kate Tilling publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Tilling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 685 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 685
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kate Tilling publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Kate Tilling, a Medicine scholar from University of Bristol, records 685 publications - the 80th percentile of the discipline.
  • 80% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Kate Tilling, and about 20% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Kate Tilling ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Kate Tilling D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate Tilling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Kate Tilling D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Kate Tilling, a Medicine scholar from University of Bristol, records 104 D-Index - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Kate Tilling, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Kate Tilling ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Kate Tilling is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with extensive publications in related subfields including Genetics, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Statistics and Probability, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist has contributed to several key topics in health and epidemiology, such as:

  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Tilling's recent impactful papers include:

  • "Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity," 2020, published in Nature Communications
  • "Long COVID burden and risk factors in 10 UK longitudinal studies and electronic health records," 2022, published in Nature Communications
  • "A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E)," 2024, published in Environment International
  • "Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts," 2020, published in The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Use of genetic variation to separate the effects of early and later life adiposity on disease risk: mendelian randomisation study," 2020, published in BMJ

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Kate Tilling include:

  • George Davey Smith
  • Debbie A. Lawlor
  • Rachael A. Hughes
  • Alex S. F. Kwong
  • Jon Heron

Their research has appeared repeatedly in prominent publication venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 79 publications
  • International Journal of Epidemiology with 15 publications
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology with 9 publications
  • European Journal of Epidemiology with 8 publications
  • American Journal of Epidemiology with 7 publications

Best Publications

  • RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

    Jonathan A.C. Sterne;Jelena Savović;Jelena Savović;Matthew J. Page;Roy G. Elbers

  • Cohort Profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort

    Abigail Fraser;Corrie Macdonald-Wallis;Kate Tilling;Andy Boyd

  • Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data.

    Gibran Hemani;Kate Tilling;George Davey Smith

  • Grip strength across the life course: normative data from twelve British studies.

    Richard M. Dodds;Holly E. Syddall;Rachel Cooper;Michaela Benzeval

  • Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology.

    Debbie A Lawlor;Kate Tilling;George Davey Smith

  • The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation.

    Paul Madley-Dowd;Rachael Hughes;Kate Tilling;Jon Heron

  • Subcortical brain volume differences in participants with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adults: a cross-sectional mega-analysis

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • Long-term effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy in preventing AIDS and death: a prospective cohort study.

    Jonathan A C Sterne;Miguel A Hernán;Bruno Ledergerber;Kate Tilling

  • Objective measurement of levels and patterns of physical activity

    Chris J Riddoch;Calum Mattocks;Kevin Deere;Jo Saunders

  • Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity

    Gareth J. Griffith;Tim T. Morris;Matthew J. Tudball;Annie Herbert

  • Association of maternal weight gain in pregnancy with offspring obesity and metabolic and vascular traits in childhood.

    Abigail Fraser;Kate Tilling;Corrie Macdonald-Wallis;Naveed Sattar

  • Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Fat Mass in a Large Cohort of Children

    Andy R Ness;Sam D Leary;Calum Mattocks;Steven N Blair

  • HHS Public Access

    Martine Hoogman;Janita Bralten;Derrek P. Hibar;Maarten Mennes

  • The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): an update on the enrolled sample of index children in 2019.

    Kate Northstone;Melanie Lewcock;Alix Groom;Andrew Boyd

  • Association between diabetes and stroke subtype on survival and functional outcome 3 months after stroke: data from the European BIOMED Stroke Project.

    Salah-Eddine Megherbi;Chantal Milan;Dominique Minier;Grégory Couvreur

  • Relationship between intraocular lens biomaterials and posterior capsule opacification.

    Paul G. Ursell;David J. Spalton;Milind V. Pande;Emma J. Hollick

  • The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsular opacification 3 years after cataract surgery.

    Emma J Hollick;David J Spalton;Paul G Ursell;Milind V Pande

  • Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision.

    Calum Mattocks;Andy Ness;Sam Leary;Kate Tilling

  • Collider bias undermines our understanding of COVID-19 disease risk and severity

    Gareth J Griffith;Tim T Morris;Matt Tudball;Annie Herbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol
George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
Richard M. Martin
Richard M. Martin University of Bristol
Jonathan A C Sterne
Jonathan A C Sterne University of Bristol
Charles D.A. Wolfe
Charles D.A. Wolfe King's College London
Jon Heron
Jon Heron University of Bristol
Andy R Ness
Andy R Ness University of Bristol
Freddie C. Hamdy
Freddie C. Hamdy University of Oxford
Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Yoav Ben-Shlomo University of Bristol
Scott M. Nelson
Scott M. Nelson University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens up a variety of career pathways through flexible online learning. Many students start their healthcare journey with specialized certifications, such as a medical coding certification cost program. These affordable courses provide foundational skills and can quickly lead to entry-level roles.

As you advance, registered nurses often consider online education to enhance their credentials. Those comparing degree costs may find that the cheapest online bsn programs offer substantial savings while maintaining high standards. RN-to-BSN track options make career growth more accessible.

For nurses aspiring to become independent practitioners, investing in the most affordable nurse practitioner programs online can help balance quality education with manageable expenses. Likewise, experienced nurses wanting leadership positions may consider the cheapest dnp programs online to reach top clinical and academic roles.

By choosing cost-effective online options, you can build a rewarding medical career without taking on excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Kate Tilling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles