World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Social Sciences and Humanities
Brazil
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 75 525 453 5 5 435 36486

Iná S. Santos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iná S. Santos between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iná S. Santos published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 20.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2023. 66 of the 584 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2023. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 47 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 28 publications
1997 2025

584 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iná S. Santos: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 3
1999 5
2000 7
2001 9
2002 4
2003 3
2004 8
2005 14
2006 11
2007 6
2008 36
2009 17
2010 14
2011 25
2012 32
2013 20
2014 18
2015 26
2016 18
2017 31
2018 26
2019 31
2020 42
2021 35
2022 28
2023 47
2024 38
2025 28
Total 584
Download as CSV

Iná S. Santos publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iná S. Santos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 434–443 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 435 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29 435
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Iná S. Santos D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iná S. Santos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45 75
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Social Sciences and Humanities in Brazil Leader Award

Overview

Iná S. Santos is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Pelotas in Brazil. Their research primarily focuses on the broad field of Medicine, with a significant concentration in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Additional subfields include Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; Clinical Psychology; General Health Professions; and Nutrition and Dietetics.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, such as:

  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare

They have published extensively, with frequent contributions in venues including:

  • Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Scientific Reports
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Iná S. Santos are:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Role of ultra-processed food in fat mass index between 6 and 11 years of age: a cohort study, 2020, International Journal of Epidemiology
  • RPS Brazilian Birth Cohorts Consortium (Ribeirão Preto, Pelotas and São Luís): history, objectives and methods, 2021, Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Fatores associados a distúrbios do sono em estudantes universitários, 2020, Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Maternal mood symptoms in pregnancy and postpartum depression: association with exclusive breastfeeding in a population-based birth cohort, 2020, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers. Leading co-authors include:

  • Alícia Matijasevich
  • Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues
  • Aluísio J. D. Barros
  • Tiago N. Munhoz
  • Fernando C. Barros

Best Publications

  • Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults

    Leandra Abarca-Gómez;Ziad A Abdeen;Zargar Abdul Hamid;Niveen M Abu-Rmeileh

  • Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants

    Bin Zhou;Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco;Goodarz Danaei;Leanne M Riley

  • Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants

    Bin Zhou;James Bentham;Mariachiara Di Cesare;Honor Bixby

  • Drinking to death: the changing face of liver disease

    MG Griswold;N Fullman;C Hawley;N Arian

  • Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil.

    Shana Ginar da Silva;Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi;Mariângela Freitas da Silveira;Marlos Rodrigues Domingues

  • The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries: findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004

    Fernando C. Barros;Cesar G. Victora;Aluisio J D Barros;Ina S. Santos

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Impact of breast feeding on admission for pneumonia during postneonatal period in Brazil: nested case-control study

    Juraci A César;Cesar G Victora;Fernando C Barros;Iná S Santos

  • Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in a sample of mothers from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study

    Iná S. Santos;Alicia Matijasevich;Beatriz Franck Tavares;Aluísio J. D. Barros

  • Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: a pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants

    Andrea Rodriguez-Martinez;Bin Zhou;Marisa K. Sophiea;James Bentham

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Consumption of ultra-processed foods and body fat during childhood and adolescence: a systematic review.

    Caroline Santos Costa;Bianca Del-Ponte;Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção;Iná Silva Santos

  • Sensibilidade e especificidade do Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) entre adultos da população geral

    Iná S. Santos;Beatriz Franck Tavares;Tiago N. Munhoz;Laura Sigaran Pio de Almeida

  • Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Very Preterm/Very Low Birth Weight: A Meta-analysis

    Adelar Pedro Franz;Gul Unsel Bolat;Hilmi Bolat;Alicia Matijasevich

  • [Sensitivity and specificity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) among adults from the general population].

    Iná S. Santos;Beatriz Franck Tavares;Tiago N. Munhoz;Laura Sigaran Pio de Almeida

  • Cohort Profile: The 2004 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study

    Iná S Santos;Aluisio J D Barros;Alicia Matijasevich;Marlos R Domingues

  • Effects of exercise in the whole spectrum of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review.

    Franklin C. Barcellos;Iná S. Santos;Daniel Umpierre;Maristela Bohlke

  • Nutrition Counseling Increases Weight Gain among Brazilian Children

    Iná Santos;Cesar G. Victora;José Martines;Helen Gonçalves

  • Aumento da prematuridade no Brasil: revisão de estudos de base populacional

    Mariângela F. da Silveira;Iná S. Santos;Aluísio J D Barros;Alicia Matijasevich

  • Linear spline multilevel models for summarising childhood growth trajectories: A guide to their application using examples from five birth cohorts

    Laura D Howe;Kate Tilling;Alicia Matijasevich;Emily S Petherick

  • Efficacy and safety of 10% and 16% carbamide peroxide tooth-whitening gels: a randomized clinical trial.

    Sônia Saeger Meireles;Sani Silva Heckmann;Fedinan Luis Leida;Iná da Silva dos Santos

Frequent Co-Authors

Aluísio J. D. Barros
Aluísio J. D. Barros Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Fernando C. Barros
Fernando C. Barros Universidade Católica de Pelotas
Cesar G. Victora
Cesar G. Victora Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Bernardo L. Horta
Bernardo L. Horta Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Ana M. B. Menezes
Ana M. B. Menezes Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Denise Petrucci Gigante
Denise Petrucci Gigante Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Marco Aurélio Peres
Marco Aurélio Peres Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Pedro Curi Hallal
Pedro Curi Hallal University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Aletta E. Schutte
Aletta E. Schutte University of New South Wales
Majid Ezzati
Majid Ezzati Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse online study options and career trajectories. Popular choices include programs in social work, psychology, and behavioral analysis – each offering unique benefits and flexibility.

Those interested in social work can opt for online msw programs affordable, allowing access to quality education without high tuition costs. For students seeking quicker entry to the workforce, there are accelerated msw online pathways that shorten the traditional degree timeline.

Career interests in psychology are equally well-supported with flexible options such as an accelerated bachelor's in psychology, ideal for those looking to complete their undergraduate studies at a faster pace.

For those drawn to behavioral analysis, certified professionals are in high demand. Online learners can find bcba online masters programs that are both accessible and cost-effective, preparing graduates for valuable roles in educational and clinical settings.

Online learning makes it possible to balance education, work, and life responsibilities—while entering impactful careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Iná S. Santos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles