World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Brazil
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6454 6073 11 11 545 47577

Fernando C. Barros publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fernando C. Barros between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fernando C. Barros published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2008. 10 of the 653 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2008. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 22 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 62 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

653 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fernando C. Barros: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 9
1986 3
1987 11
1988 4
1989 4
1990 6
1991 5
1992 9
1993 11
1994 5
1995 3
1996 22
1997 9
1998 11
1999 3
2000 7
2001 9
2002 8
2003 10
2004 6
2005 8
2006 10
2007 10
2008 62
2009 6
2010 20
2011 18
2012 18
2013 17
2014 19
2015 39
2016 33
2017 28
2018 20
2019 32
2020 44
2021 40
2022 35
2023 20
2024 6
2025 9
2026 1
Total 653
Download as CSV

Fernando C. Barros publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando C. Barros sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 545 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 545
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Fernando C. Barros D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando C. Barros sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Brazil Leader Award

Overview

Fernando C. Barros is affiliated with Universidade Católica de Pelotas in Brazil. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, and Nutrition and Dietetics.

The researcher's work spans several key topics in health and development, including:

  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Fernando C. Barros include Bernardo Lessa Horta, César G. Victora, Aluísio J. D. Barros, Mariângela Freitas da Silveira, and Iná S. Santos. These collaborations have contributed to a body of work that addresses various public health challenges through epidemiological and clinical research.

Their research has been published extensively in the following venues:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Cadernos de Saúde Pública
  • Revista de Saúde Pública
  • UNC Libraries
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among the notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Fernando C. Barros are:

  • "SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in Brazil: results from two successive nationwide serological household surveys" (2020), published in The Lancet Global Health
  • "Population-based surveys of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Southern Brazil" (2020), published in Nature Medicine
  • "Remarkable variability in SARS-CoV-2 antibodies across Brazilian regions: nationwide serological household survey in 27 states" (2020), published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Effects of early-life poverty on health and human capital in children and adolescents: analyses of national surveys and birth cohort studies in LMICs" (2022), published in The Lancet
  • "Vaccine coverage within the first year of life and associated factors with incomplete immunization in a Brazilian birth cohort" (2020), published in Archives of Public Health

Through these contributions, Fernando C. Barros has documented epidemiological trends and health disparities, focusing on antibody prevalence in the context of SARS-CoV-2 and the broader impacts of social determinants such as poverty on child health outcomes. The research integrates large-scale surveys and cohort analyses, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach that bridges clinical, psychological, and environmental health perspectives.

Best Publications

  • International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project

    José Villar;Leila Cheikh Ismail;Cesar G Victora;Eric O Ohuma;Eric O Ohuma

  • Global Epidemiology of Use of and Disparities in Caesarean Sections

    Ties Boerma;Carine Ronsmans;Dessalegn Y. Melesse;Aluisio J. D. Barros

  • Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges

    César Gomes Victora;Estela Maria Motta Lima Leão de Aquino;Maria do Carmo Leal;Carlos Augusto Monteiro

  • Association between breastfeeding and intelligence, educational attainment, and income at 30 years of age: a prospective birth cohort study from Brazil

    Cesar G. Victora;Bernardo L. Horta;Christian Loret de Mola;Luciana de Avila Quevedo

  • Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis.

    Joanne Katz;Anne C. C. Lee;Anne C. C. Lee;Naoko Kozuki;Joy E. Lawn;Joy E. Lawn

  • Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies

    Cesar G Victora;J Patrick Vaughan;Fernando C Barros;Anamaria C Silva

  • International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project

    Aris T Papageorghiou;Eric O Ohuma;Eric O Ohuma;Douglas G Altman;Tullia Todros

  • Congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation

    Giovanny V A França;Lavinia Schuler-Faccini;Wanderson K Oliveira;Claudio M P Henriques

  • Health conditions and health-policy innovations in Brazil: the way forward

    Cesar Gomes Victora;Maurício Lima Barreto;Maria do Carmo Leal;Carlos Augusto Monteiro

  • Risk of childhood undernutrition related to small-for-gestational age and preterm birth in low- and middle-income countries

    Parul Christian;Sun Eun Lee;Moira Donahue Angel;Linda S. Adair

  • ‘Kangaroo mother care’ to prevent neonatal deaths due to preterm birth complications

    Joy E Lawn;Judith Mwansa-Kambafwile;Bernardo L Horta;Fernando C Barros

  • The challenge of reducing neonatal mortality in middle-income countries: findings from three Brazilian birth cohorts in 1982, 1993, and 2004

    Fernando C. Barros;Cesar G. Victora;Aluisio J D Barros;Ina S. Santos

  • Epidemiologia da desigualdade

    Cesar G Victora;Fernando C Barros;J. Patrick Vaughan

  • Epidemiologia de la desigualdad

    Cesar Victora;Fernando Barros;J. Patrick Vaughan

  • Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods.

    Dominique P Béhague;Cesar G Victora;Fernando C Barros

  • Low birthweight, preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation in relation to maternal smoking.

    Bernardo Lessa Horta;Cesar Gomes Victora;Ana Maria Menezes;Ricardo Halpern

  • Impact of breast feeding on admission for pneumonia during postneonatal period in Brazil: nested case-control study

    Juraci A César;Cesar G Victora;Fernando C Barros;Iná S Santos

  • Fatores de risco para suspeita de atraso no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor aos 12 meses de vida

    Ricardo Halpern;Elsa R. J. Giugliani;Cesar G. Victora;Fernando C. Barros

  • Pacifier Use and Short Breastfeeding Duration: Cause, Consequence, or Coincidence?

    Cesar Gomes Victora;Dominique Pareja Behague;Fernando Celso Barros;Maria Teresa Anselmo Olinto

  • The associations of parity and maternal age with small-for-gestational-age, preterm, and neonatal and infant mortality: a meta-analysis

    Naoko Kozuki;Anne Cc Lee;Anne Cc Lee;Mariangela F Silveira;Ayesha Sania

Frequent Co-Authors

Cesar G. Victora
Cesar G. Victora Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Bernardo L. Horta
Bernardo L. Horta Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Iná S. Santos
Iná S. Santos Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Aluísio J. D. Barros
Aluísio J. D. Barros Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Ana M. B. Menezes
Ana M. B. Menezes Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Denise Petrucci Gigante
Denise Petrucci Gigante Universidade Federal de Pelotas
Aris T. Papageorghiou
Aris T. Papageorghiou University of Oxford
Pedro Curi Hallal
Pedro Curi Hallal University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Stephen Kennedy
Stephen Kennedy University of Oxford
Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Zulfiqar A Bhutta Aga Khan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse and flexible career pathways in healthcare beyond traditional medical school. For students interested in pharmacy, online pharm d programs offer a blended approach to becoming a licensed pharmacist, often providing a more affordable and flexible study option.

The evolving field of data and technology in healthcare has made roles in health informatics highly sought after. Earning a credential from healthcare informatics degree programs can prepare students for careers managing crucial medical data and improving patient care.

Rapid growth in telehealth and digital services has created demand for skilled professionals in billing and records. Training through medical billing and coding online is a popular entry point to this stable and essential career area.

For those drawn to clinical roles, cheapest np programs online provide a path to advanced nursing practice, often at a lower cost and with flexible schedules. These options allow students to tailor their healthcare journey to fit individual goals and lifestyles.

Best Scientists Citing Fernando C. Barros

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles