World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
17636
World Ranking
10619
National Ranking
811

Robin Thompson publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin Thompson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 225 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Robin Thompson D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robin Thompson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Confidence Intervals in QTL Mapping by Bootstrapping

    Peter M. Visscher;Robin Thompson;Chris S. Haley

  • The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: an overview of current mixed model approaches

    A B Smith;Brian R Cullis;R Thompson

  • Marker-assisted selection using ridge regression.

    John C. Whittaker;Robin Thompson;Mike C. Denham

  • On the mapping of QTL by regression of phenotype on marker-type

    J C Whittaker;R Thompson;P M Visscher

  • CD40lbase: a database of CD40L gene mutations causing X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome.

    Luigi D. Notarangelo;Manuel C. Peitsch;Tore G. Abrahamsen;Colette Bachelot

  • Variation in response to neonicotinoid insecticides in peach‐potato aphids, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

    Stephen P Foster;Ian Denholm;Robin Thompson

  • Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.

    Robin Thompson

  • A covariance function for feed intake, live weight, and milk yield estimated using a random regression model.

    R.F. Veerkamp;R. Thompson

  • Reduced response of insecticide-resistant aphids and attraction of parasitoids to aphid alarm pheromone; a potential fitness trade-off

    S.P. Foster;I. Denholm;R. Thompson;G.M. Poppy

  • Prediction of genetic merit from data on binary and quantitative variates with an application to calving difficulty, birth weight and pelvic opening

    J. L. Foulley;D. Gianola;R. Thompson

  • Reduced alarm response by peach-potato aphids, Myzus persicae (Hemiptera : Aphididae), with knock-down resistance to insecticides (kdr) may impose a fitness cost through increased vulnerability to natural enemies

    S.P. Foster;C.M. Woodcock;M.S. Williamson;A.L. Devonshire

  • Using marker-maps in marker-assisted selection

    J C Whittaker;R N Curnow;Chris Haley;R Thompson

  • Genomic Selection in Multi-environment Crop Trials

    Helena Oakey;Brian R Cullis;Robin Thompson;Jordi Comadran

  • Prediction of long-term contributions and inbreeding in populations undergoing mass selection

    John Woolliams;N.R. Wray;R. Thompson

  • Behavioural side-effects of insecticide resistance in aphids increase their vulnerability to parasitoid attack

    Stephen P. Foster;Monique Tomiczek;Robin Thompson;Ian Denholm

  • Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.

    Robin Thompson;Sue Brotherstone;Ian M.S White

  • The analysis of quantitative trait loci in multi-environment trials using a multiplicative mixed model

    A. P. Verbyla;P. J. Eckermann;R. Thompson;B. R. Cullis

  • A population genetics model of marker-assisted selection.

    Z.W. Luo;R. Thompson;John Woolliams

  • Methods for predicting rates of inbreeding in selected populations.

    N.R. Wray;John Woolliams;John Woolliams;R. Thompson;R. Thompson

  • Association of MACE-based insecticide resistance in Myzus persicae with reproductive rate, response to alarm pheromone and vulnerability to attack by Aphidius colemani

    Stephen P Foster;Neil B Kift;Jason Baverstock;Sue Sime

Frequent Co-Authors

William G. Hill
William G. Hill University of Edinburgh
Chris Haley
Chris Haley University of Edinburgh
Peter M. Visscher
Peter M. Visscher University of Oxford
Geoff Simm
Geoff Simm University of Edinburgh
John Woolliams
John Woolliams University of Edinburgh
Esa Mäntysaari
Esa Mäntysaari Natural Resources Institute Finland
Ian Denholm
Ian Denholm University of Hertfordshire
Roel F. Veerkamp
Roel F. Veerkamp Wageningen University & Research
Naomi R. Wray
Naomi R. Wray University of Queensland
Ismo Strandén
Ismo Strandén Natural Resources Institute Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Biology and Biochemistry opens up diverse opportunities in both science and healthcare. Many students are choosing the convenience of online learning to balance studies with work or family commitments.

A popular option is a bs in biology online, which provides a strong foundation in biological sciences and can lead to roles in research, education, or lab work. For those interested in patient care, earning an asn program online can start you on the path to becoming a registered nurse, a critical and rewarding profession.

Another growing field is nutrition. An online bachelor's in nutrition prepares graduates for careers as nutritionists, wellness coaches, or consultants in public health. For those looking to advance into healthcare administration, accredited degrees like cahme-accredited online mha programs equip students with the skills needed for leadership roles in hospitals and clinics.

These flexible online options can help you tailor your education to your career aspirations in the life sciences and healthcare sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Robin Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles