World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
75
Citations
25288
World Ranking
19034
National Ranking
9491

Partho P. Sengupta publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Partho P. Sengupta sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 383 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Partho P. Sengupta D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Partho P. Sengupta sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1996 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Partho P. Sengupta is affiliated with West Virginia University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with specific emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education.

Key publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Partho P. Sengupta are:

  • Naveena Yanamala
  • Yasmin S. Hamirani
  • Kameswari Maganti
  • Nobuyuki Kagiyama
  • Sirish Shrestha

Notable recent papers include:

  • High Prevalence of Pericardial Involvement in College Student Athletes Recovering From COVID-19 (2020) - JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Machine Learning Evaluation (PRIME): A Checklist (2020) - JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Screening of Potential Cardiac Involvement in Competitive Athletes Recovering From COVID-19 (2020) - JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Deep-Learning Models for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Diastolic Dysfunction (2021) - JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Machine Learning Assessment of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function Based on Electrocardiographic Features (2020) - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Partho P. Sengupta was awarded the title Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 1996.

Best Publications

  • Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese society of echocardiography

    Victor Mor-Avi;Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Marek Belohlavek

  • Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging

    Jens Uwe Voigt;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Peter Lysyansky;Tom H. Marwick

  • Assessment of Myocardial Mechanics Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications

    Holly Geyer;Giuseppe Caracciolo;Haruhiko Abe;Susan Wilansky

  • Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging.

    Luigi P. Badano;Theodore J. Kolias;Denisa Muraru;Theodore P. Abraham

  • Twist Mechanics of the Left Ventricle: Principles and Application

    Partho P. Sengupta;A. Jamil Tajik;Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran;Bijoy K. Khandheria

  • Left ventricular structure and function: basic science for cardiac imaging.

    Partho P. Sengupta;Josef Korinek;Marek Belohlavek;Jagat Narula

  • Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

    Damini Dey;Piotr J. Slomka;Paul Leeson;Dorin Comaniciu

  • Two-Dimensional Strain–A Doppler-Independent Ultrasound Method for Quantitation of Regional Deformation: Validation In Vitro and In Vivo

    Josef Korinek;Jianwen Wang;Partho P. Sengupta;Chinami Miyazaki

  • Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet?

    Khader Shameer;Kipp W Johnson;Benjamin S Glicksberg;Joel T Dudley

  • Mobile technology and the digitization of healthcare.

    Sanjeev P. Bhavnani;Jagat Narula;Partho P. Sengupta

  • Left Ventricular Form and Function Revisited : Applied Translational Science to Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging

    Partho P. Sengupta;Vijay K. Krishnamoorthy;Josef Korinek;Jagat Narula;Jagat Narula

  • Tissue Tracking Technology for Assessing Cardiac Mechanics: Principles, Normal Values, and Clinical Applications

    Piet Claus;Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Partho P. Sengupta

  • Machine-Learning Algorithms to Automate Morphological and Functional Assessments in 2D Echocardiography

    Sukrit Narula;Sukrit Narula;Khader Shameer;Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar;Joel T. Dudley

  • Emerging trends in CV flow visualization

    Partho P. Sengupta;Gianni Pedrizzetti;Philip J. Kilner;Arash Kheradvar

  • Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: A Unique Cardiomyopathy With Variable Ventricular Morphology

    R. Todd Hurst;Abhiram Prasad;J. Wells Askew;Partho P. Sengupta

  • Apex-to-base dispersion in regional timing of left ventricular shortening and lengthening.

    Partho P. Sengupta;Bijoy K. Khandheria;Josef Korinek;Jianwen Wang

  • Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection.

    Albert M. Kasel;Salvatore Cassese;Sabine Bleiziffer;Makoto Amaki

  • Fully Automated Versus Standard Tracking of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Longitudinal Strain: The FAST-EFs Multicenter Study.

    Christian Knackstedt;Sebastiaan C.A.M. Bekkers;Georg Schummers;Marcus Schreckenberg

  • Left ventricular isovolumic flow sequence during sinus and paced rhythms: new insights from use of high-resolution Doppler and ultrasonic digital particle imaging velocimetry.

    Partho P. Sengupta;Bijoy K. Khandheria;Josef Korinek;Arshad Jahangir

  • Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Agonist Fingolimod Increases Myocardial Salvage and Decreases Adverse Postinfarction Left Ventricular Remodeling in a Porcine Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion

    Carlos G. Santos-Gallego;Torsten P. Vahl;Georg Goliasch;Belen Picatoste

Frequent Co-Authors

Jagat Narula
Jagat Narula Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Bijoy K. Khandheria
Bijoy K. Khandheria University of Wisconsin–Madison
Thomas H. Marwick
Thomas H. Marwick Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute
Joel T. Dudley
Joel T. Dudley Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Valentin Fuster
Valentin Fuster Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
A. Jamil Tajik
A. Jamil Tajik Mayo Clinic
Matthew J. Budoff
Matthew J. Budoff UCLA Medical Center
Roger J. Hajjar
Roger J. Hajjar Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Juan J. Badimon
Juan J. Badimon Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Samin K. Sharma
Samin K. Sharma Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always require a traditional, on-campus path. Many students choose online degrees for their flexibility and accelerated learning options. For nurses looking to advance their qualifications, there are online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These programs allow registered nurses to earn their BSN without the need for additional clinical hours, making it easier for working professionals to balance study with their careers.

Those seeking higher leadership roles in nursing may consider short dnp programs that can be completed more quickly, or look for the easiest dnp program online to fit around a busy lifestyle. These Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs offer advanced clinical knowledge and prepare graduates for top positions in healthcare.

Additionally, individuals aiming to join the nursing workforce rapidly may find the 6 month lpn program online attractive. Fast-track Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) programs can help students enter the field in less than a year, providing a streamlined entry into patient care and nursing practice.

Best Scientists Citing Partho P. Sengupta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles