World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11721 11025 6013 5565 555 31685

Bijoy K. Khandheria publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bijoy K. Khandheria between 1984 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bijoy K. Khandheria published across 41 years, from 1984 to 2024, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2008. 11 of the 560 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2008. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 29 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications
1984 2024

560 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bijoy K. Khandheria: publications per year, 1984 to 2024
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 4
1989 11
1990 7
1991 10
1992 6
1993 5
1994 8
1995 8
1996 4
1997 3
1998 6
1999 11
2000 9
2001 7
2002 18
2003 13
2004 29
2005 16
2006 18
2007 21
2008 32
2009 22
2010 17
2011 5
2012 25
2013 26
2014 28
2015 24
2016 25
2017 31
2018 18
2019 17
2020 21
2021 32
2022 7
2023 7
2024 4
Total 560
Download as CSV

Bijoy K. Khandheria publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bijoy K. Khandheria sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 555 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 555
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bijoy K. Khandheria D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bijoy K. Khandheria sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bijoy K. Khandheria is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a prominent focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Over their career, they have contributed extensively to various subfields, including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

The scientist's research topics cover a wide array of cardiovascular-related areas. Their main topics of work include Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies, Ultrasound in Clinical Applications, and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments.

Frequent collaborators in their work include A. Jamil Tajik, Renuka Jain, Sarah Roemer, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno, and Lakshmi Muthukumar. This network of coauthors reflects a collaborative approach across their studies and publications.

Bijoy K. Khandheria has published in several key journals. The most frequent venues for their research are the Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, and CASE.

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Bijoy K. Khandheria include:

  • Self-expanding Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients, 2022, JAMA Cardiology
  • The Utility of Myocardial Work in Clinical Practice, 2021, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Myocardial Work in Echocardiography, 2023, Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Association Between Malignant Mitral Valve Prolapse and Sudden Cardiac Death, 2020, JAMA Cardiology
  • Myocardial work assessment in severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for Evaluation of Prosthetic Valves With Echocardiography and Doppler Ultrasound. A Report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, Developed in Conjunction With the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association

    William A. Zoghbi;John B. Chambers;Jean G. Dumesnil;Elyse Foster

  • Assessment of Myocardial Mechanics Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications

    Holly Geyer;Giuseppe Caracciolo;Haruhiko Abe;Susan Wilansky

  • American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

    Christopher P Cannon;Alexander Battler;Ralph G Brindis;Jafna L Cox

  • Transesophageal echocardiography: technique, anatomic correlations, implementation, and clinical applications.

    James B. Seward;Bijoy K. Khandheria;Jae K. Oh;Martin D. Abel

  • Twist Mechanics of the Left Ventricle: Principles and Application

    Partho P. Sengupta;A. Jamil Tajik;Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran;Bijoy K. Khandheria

  • Carcinoid heart disease. Clinical and echocardiographic spectrum in 74 patients

    P A Pellikka;A J Tajik;B K Khandheria;J B Seward

  • Left ventricular structure and function: basic science for cardiac imaging.

    Partho P. Sengupta;Josef Korinek;Marek Belohlavek;Jagat Narula

  • Atrial Septal Aneurysm in Adult Patients A Multicenter Study Using Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography

    Andreas Mügge;Werner G. Daniel;Christiane Angermann;Christoph Spes

  • Patent Foramen Ovale: Innocent or Guilty?: Evidence From a Prospective Population-Based Study

    Irene Meissner;Bijoy K. Khandheria;John A. Heit;George W. Petty

  • Anatomy of the Normal Left Atrial Appendage A Quantitative Study of Age-Related Changes in 500 Autopsy Hearts: Implications for Echocardiographic Examination

    John P. Veinot;Phillip J. Harrity;Federico Gentile;Bijoy K. Khandheria

  • ACCF/ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 Appropriateness Criteria for Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography*

    Pamela S. Douglas;Bijoy Khandheria;Raymond F. Stainback;Neil J. Weissman

  • Unlocking the Mysteries of Diastolic Function: Deciphering the Rosetta Stone 10 Years Later

    Steven J. Lester;A. Jamil Tajik;Rick A. Nishimura;Jae K. Oh

  • Prevalence of potential risk factors for stroke assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography: The SPARC study

    I Meissner;J P Whisnant;B K Khandheria;P C Spittell

  • Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report.

    Julius M. Gardin;David B. Adams;Pamela S. Douglas;Harvey Feigenbaum

  • Biplanar Transesophageal Echocardiography: Anatomic Correlations, Image Orientation, and Clinical Applications

    James B. Seward;Bijoy K. Khandheria;William D. Edwards;Jae K. Oh

  • Left Ventricular Form and Function Revisited : Applied Translational Science to Cardiovascular Ultrasound Imaging

    Partho P. Sengupta;Vijay K. Krishnamoorthy;Josef Korinek;Jagat Narula;Jagat Narula

  • Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage.

    Yoram Agmon;Bijoy K Khandheria;Federico Gentile;James B Seward

  • Frequency of Atrial Septal Aneurysms in Patients With Cerebral Ischemic Events

    Y Agmon;B K Khandheria;I Meissner;F Gentile

  • Early Morning Attenuation of Endothelial Function in Healthy Humans

    Maria E. Otto;Anna Svatikova;Rodrigo Bellio de Mattos Barretto;Simone Santos

  • American society of echocardiography

    Thomas Ryan;Bijoy K Khandheria

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Seward
James B. Seward Mayo Clinic
A. Jamil Tajik
A. Jamil Tajik Mayo Clinic
Partho P. Sengupta
Partho P. Sengupta West Virginia University
Jack P. Whisnant
Jack P. Whisnant Mayo Clinic
Jae K. Oh
Jae K. Oh Mayo Clinic
Kent R. Bailey
Kent R. Bailey Mayo Clinic
Jagat Narula
Jagat Narula Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Medicine? There are a variety of related online degrees and specialized career pathways that can complement or offer alternative routes into the healthcare industry.

One popular option is earning a degree in healthcare management. If you want a flexible and reputable credential, check out the best online healthcare administration degree programs to fast-track your move into leadership roles. Nursing professionals interested in advancing their careers might explore an rn to np bridge program, which helps registered nurses become nurse practitioners faster via streamlined coursework.

Nutrition is another fast-growing field in healthcare. Accredited online nutrition degree programs provide flexible pathways for those looking to combine science with patient care. For all degree seekers, choosing the right program makes a big difference: learn which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? to ensure you receive a high-quality, respected education that employers trust.

Best Scientists Citing Bijoy K. Khandheria

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles