World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kent R. Bailey

Kent R. Bailey

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
152
Citations
85750
World Ranking
1079
National Ranking
620

Kent R. Bailey publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent R. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 771 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kent R. Bailey D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent R. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 152 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kent R. Bailey is a researcher primarily affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their work spans various disciplines within medicine, with a strong focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, surgery, genetics, and epidemiology.

The scientist's recent publications include studies published between 2020 and 2023 covering clinical and epidemiological aspects of cardiovascular and metabolic health. Notable papers authored by Bailey include:

  • Effect of Genotype-Guided Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Selection vs Conventional Clopidogrel Therapy on Ischemic Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (2020, JAMA)
  • Effect of CYP2C19 Genotype on Ischemic Outcomes During Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy (2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions)
  • Escalating incidence of infective endocarditis in Europe in the 21st century (2021, Open Heart)
  • Cardiovascular Health and Outcomes in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (2020, The American Journal of Cardiology)
  • Global distributions of age- and sex-related arterial stiffness: systematic review and meta-analysis of 167 studies with 509,743 participants (2023, EBioMedicine)

Frequent collaborators with Bailey include:

  • Adil E. Bharucha
  • Adrian Vella
  • Grant M. Spears
  • Taleen A. MacArthur
  • Aoife M. Egan

Contributions have been published repeatedly in key venues such as:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • Circulation
  • Shock
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia

The main areas of study for Bailey's research output include medicine broadly, with extensive work in cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and surgery. Genetics and epidemiology also constitute significant subfields of their scholarly pursuits.

Bailey's investigations cover topics in:

  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases
  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diabetes treatment and management
  • Diabetes, cardiovascular risks, and lipoproteins
  • Health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life

Best Publications

  • Secular Trends in Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and Implications on the Projections for Future Prevalence

    Yoko Miyasaka;Marion E. Barnes;Bernard J. Gersh;Stephen S. Cha

  • New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function--a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy

    C Tei;L H Ling;D O Hodge;K R Bailey

  • Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Long-Term Outcome and Prognostic Implications With Quantitative Doppler Assessment

    Francesco Grigioni;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;Kenton J. Zehr;Kent R. Bailey

  • Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum : A 30-year population-based study

    John A. Heit;Catie E. Kobbervig;Andra H. James;Tanya M. Petterson

  • Effect of interleukin-1β inhibition with canakinumab on incident lung cancer in patients with atherosclerosis: exploratory results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Paul M Ridker;Jean G MacFadyen;Tom Thuren;Brendan M Everett

  • Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender.

    Margaret M Redfield;Richard J Rodeheffer;Steven J Jacobsen;Douglas W Mahoney

  • Congestive heart failure in the community: a study of all incident cases in Olmsted County, Minnesota, in 1991.

    Michele Senni;Christophe M. Tribouilloy;Richard J. Rodeheffer;Steven J. Jacobsen

  • Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden

    Teresa S.M Tsang;Marion E Barnes;Bernard J Gersh;Kent R Bailey

  • Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function

    Chuwa Tei;Chuwa Tei;Karl S. Dujardin;Karl S. Dujardin;David O. Hodge;David O. Hodge;Kent R. Bailey;Kent R. Bailey

  • Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial Infarction

    Raymond J. Gibbons;David R. Holmes;Guy S. Reeder;Kent R. Bailey

  • Outcome of 622 Adults With Asymptomatic, Hemodynamically Significant Aortic Stenosis During Prolonged Follow-Up

    Patricia A. Pellikka;Maurice E. Sarano;Rick A. Nishimura;Joseph F. Malouf

  • Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A as a Marker of Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Antoni Bayes-Genis;Cheryl A. Conover;Michael T. Overgaard;Kent R. Bailey

  • Valve repair improves the outcome of surgery for mitral regurgitation: A multivariate analysis

    M Enriquez-Sarano;H V Schaff;T A Orszulak;A J Tajik

  • Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter?

    Teresa S.M. Tsang;Walter P. Abhayaratna;Marion E. Barnes;Yoko Miyasaka

  • Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;James B. Seward

  • Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women

    Teresa S.M Tsang;Bernard J Gersh;Christopher P Appleton;A.Jamil Tajik

  • Left atrial volume: important risk marker of incident atrial fibrillation in 1655 older men and women.

    Teresa S.M. Tsang;Marion E. Barnes;Kent R. Bailey;Cynthia L. Leibson

  • Echocardiographic prediction of survival after surgical correction of organic mitral regurgitation.

    M Enriquez-Sarano;A J Tajik;H V Schaff;T A Orszulak

  • Clinical outcome of mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet.

    Lieng H. Ling;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;James B. Seward;A. Jamil Tajik

  • Superiority of brain natriuretic peptide as a hormonal marker of ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy.

    Kazuhiro Yamamoto;John C. Burnett;Michihisa Jougasaki;Rick A. Nishimura

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Seward
James B. Seward Mayo Clinic
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic
A. Jamil Tajik
A. Jamil Tajik Mayo Clinic
John A. Heit
John A. Heit Mayo Clinic
John C. Burnett
John C. Burnett Mayo Clinic
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare, there are many flexible online degree and career options beyond a traditional MD. If you’re already a registered nurse, you might explore online rn to bsn no clinicals programs, which let you earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing without the need for additional costly clinical placements.

Those seeking to advance their practice might look into dnp online programs, offering doctoral-level studies in nursing practice that can often be completed faster than traditional on-campus options. Additionally, there are dnp programs with flexible entry criteria, intended to help working professionals upskill without excessive barriers.

If you are new to nursing, fast lpn program pathways promise an accelerated route to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse while studying mostly online. These alternative degrees and certificates open diverse doors in healthcare—allowing for career growth, specialization, and flexible learning to fit your life.

Best Scientists Citing Kent R. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles