World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James B. Seward

James B. Seward

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
153
Citations
104714
World Ranking
1028
National Ranking
585

James B. Seward publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James B. Seward sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 673 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James B. Seward D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James B. Seward sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 153 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James B. Seward is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and works primarily in the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance. Their research portfolio includes studies on finance and general economics, with a significant focus on global financial crises, monetary policy, and banking stability.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics relating to financial policies and health-related social risks. Notable papers include:

  • Central Bank Governance and Reserve Portfolios Investment Policies: An Empirical Analysis, 2021, published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Measuring Health-Related Social Risks in a Lung Cancer Screening Cohort, 2025, published in Journal of the American College of Radiology

Seward frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Co-authors include Daniela Klingebiel, Carmen Mileva Herrero Montes, Marco Ruiz, Farouk Dako, and Petr Karásek.

Their work appears in journals such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of the American College of Radiology

Seward's research interests cover several interconnected topics:

  • Global Financial Crisis and Policies
  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Monetary Policy and Economic Impact

Their contributions mainly engage with empirical and theoretical investigations within economics and finance, addressing issues pertinent to contemporary financial governance and health-related measurement frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B. Devereux;Frank A. Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B Devereux;Frank A Flachskampf

  • Secular Trends in Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and Implications on the Projections for Future Prevalence

    Yoko Miyasaka;Marion E. Barnes;Bernard J. Gersh;Stephen S. Cha

  • New index of combined systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: a simple and reproducible measure of cardiac function--a study in normals and dilated cardiomyopathy

    C Tei;L H Ling;D O Hodge;K R Bailey

  • Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden

    Teresa S.M Tsang;Marion E Barnes;Bernard J Gersh;Kent R Bailey

  • Left Atrial Size: Physiologic Determinants and Clinical Applications

    Walter P. Abhayaratna;James B. Seward;Christopher P. Appleton;Pamela S. Douglas

  • Doppler echocardiographic index for assessment of global right ventricular function

    Chuwa Tei;Chuwa Tei;Karl S. Dujardin;Karl S. Dujardin;David O. Hodge;David O. Hodge;Kent R. Bailey;Kent R. Bailey

  • Continuous wave doppler determination of right ventricular pressure: A simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study in 127 patients

    Philip J. Currie;James B. Seward;Kwan-Leung Chan;Derek A. Fyfe

  • Noninvasive Doppler-derived myocardial performance index: Correlation with simultaneous measurements of cardiac catheterization measurements

    Chuwa Tei;Rick A. Nishimura;James B. Seward;A.Jamil Tajik

  • Transesophageal echocardiography: technique, anatomic correlations, implementation, and clinical applications.

    James B. Seward;Bijoy K. Khandheria;Jae K. Oh;Martin D. Abel

  • Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: A quantitative clinical study.

    Siu F. Yiu;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;Christophe Tribouilloy;James B. Seward

  • The noninvasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography

    Jae K. Oh;Christopher P. Appleton;Liv K. Hatle;Rick A. Nishimura

  • Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter?

    Teresa S.M. Tsang;Walter P. Abhayaratna;Marion E. Barnes;Yoko Miyasaka

  • Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction

    Jacob E. Møller;Graham S. Hillis;Jae K. Oh;James B. Seward

  • Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women

    Teresa S.M Tsang;Bernard J Gersh;Christopher P Appleton;A.Jamil Tajik

  • Left atrial volume: important risk marker of incident atrial fibrillation in 1655 older men and women.

    Teresa S.M. Tsang;Marion E. Barnes;Kent R. Bailey;Cynthia L. Leibson

  • Clinical outcome of mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet.

    Lieng H. Ling;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano;James B. Seward;A. Jamil Tajik

  • Value of a Doppler-Derived Index Combining Systolic and Diastolic Time Intervals in Predicting Outcome in Primary Pulmonary Hypertension

    Tiong Cheng Yeo;Karl S Dujardin;Chuwa Tei;Douglas W Mahoney

  • Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era Evolving Clinical Spectrum and Impact on Outcome After Pericardiectomy

    Lieng H. Ling;Jae K. Oh;Hartzell V. Schaff;Gordon K. Danielson

  • Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic myocardial performance : Clinical value in cardiac amyloidosis

    Chuwa Tei;Karl S. Dujardin;David O. Hodge;Robert A. Kyle

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine is a significant commitment, but there are many related online degree options that can open doors in healthcare and expand your professional opportunities.

For those interested in healthcare administration, enrolling in online mha programs cahme accredited can provide a flexible route to leadership roles in hospitals or clinics. Nurses seeking advancement can earn their bachelor’s through an rn to bsn online with no clinicals program, making it possible to continue working while studying.

If your goal is to become a nurse leader or educator, consider the fastest online dnp programs for a quicker path to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Cost is often a concern, so exploring the cheapest dnp programs can help you advance your education affordably.

Each of these online pathways offers flexibility for working professionals, helping you grow your skills and career without having to put your life on hold.

Best Scientists Citing James B. Seward

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles