World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gordon K. Danielson

Gordon K. Danielson

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
112
Citations
44093
World Ranking
5156
National Ranking
2789

Gordon K. Danielson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon K. Danielson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 452 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gordon K. Danielson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gordon K. Danielson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gordon K. Danielson was affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Throughout their career, they contributed to the scientific community, although specific details on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, and fields of study are not available.

There is no recorded data on distinct research topics, main or subfields of study, or notable publication venues connected to their work. Likewise, no information about coauthors or collaborative networks has been documented.

Additionally, there is no record of awards or recognitions received by Gordon K. Danielson during their career. There are also no listed book publications associated with their name.

Gordon K. Danielson is known to be deceased, and any accounts of their work are presented in past tense as per available records. The absence of detailed public documentation makes it difficult to specify distinct contributions or areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines

    Barry J. Maron;William J. McKenna;Gordon K. Danielson;Lukas J. Kappenberger

  • Task Force 1: The Changing Profile of Congenital Heart Disease in Adult Life

    Carole A Warnes;Richard Liberthson;Gordon K Danielson;Annie Dore

  • Long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

    Joseph G. Murphy;Bernard J. Gersh;Douglas D. Mair;Valentin Fuster

  • Long-term outcome after surgical repair of isolated atrial septal defect. Follow-up at 27 to 32 years

    Joseph G. Murphy;Bernard J. Gersh;Michael D. McGoon;Douglas D. Mair

  • Long-term effects of surgical septal myectomy on survival in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Steve R. Ommen;Barry J. Maron;Iacopo Olivotto;Martin S. Maron

  • Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era Evolving Clinical Spectrum and Impact on Outcome After Pericardiectomy

    Lieng H. Ling;Jae K. Oh;Hartzell V. Schaff;Gordon K. Danielson

  • Five- to fifteen-year follow-up after Fontan operation.

    David J. Driscoll;Kenneth P. Offord;Robert H. Feldt;Hartzell V Schaff

  • Ebstein’s Anomaly

    Christine H. Attenhofer Jost;Heidi M. Connolly;Joseph A. Dearani;William D. Edwards

  • A Platelet-Inhibitor-Drug Trial in Coronary-Artery Bypass Operations: Benefit of Perioperative Dipyridamole and Aspirin Therapy on Early Postoperative Vein-Graft Patency

    J. H. Chesebro;I. P. Clements;V. Fuster;L. R. Elveback

  • Effect of Dipyridamole and Aspirin on Late Vein-Graft Patency after Coronary Bypass Operations

    James H. Chesebro;Valentin Fuster;Lila R. Elveback;Ian P. Clements

  • Constrictive Pericarditis in 26 Patients With Histologically Normal Pericardial Thickness

    Deepak R. Talreja;William D. Edwards;Gordon K. Danielson;Hartzell V. Schaff

  • Protein-losing enteropathy after the Fontan operation.

    Robert H. Feldt;David J. Driscoll;Kenneth P. Offord;Ruth H. Cha

  • Trial of combined warfarin plus dipyridamole or aspirin therapy in prosthetic heart valve replacement: Danger of aspirin compared with dipyridamole

    James H Chesebro;Valentin Fuster;Lila R Elveback;Dwight C McGoon

  • High risk of thromboemboli early after bioprosthetic cardiac valve replacement

    Magda Heras;James H. Chesebro;Valentin Fuster;William J. Penny

  • Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis

    Jae K. Oh;Liv K. Hatle;James B. Seward;Gordon K. Danielson

  • Late pulmonary valve replacement after repair of tetralogy of Fallot

    Berent Discigil;Joseph A. Dearani;Francisco J. Puga;Hartzell V. Schaff

  • Late follow-up of 1095 patients undergoing operation for complex congenital heart disease utilizing pulmonary ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits

    Joseph A Dearani;Gordon K Danielson;Francisco J Puga;Hartzell V Schaff

  • Comparison of ethanol septal reduction therapy with surgical myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

    Sherif F Nagueh;Steve R Ommen;Nasser M Lakkis;Donna Killip

  • Cox-Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation: Mayo Clinic experience.

    Hartzell V. Schaff;Joseph A. Dearani;Richard G. Daly;Thomas A. Orszulak

  • Surgical Patent Foramen Ovale Closure for Prevention of Paradoxical Embolism–Related Cerebrovascular Ischemic Events

    Joseph A. Dearani;Baran S. Ugurlu;Gordon K. Danielson;Richard C. Daly

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in healthcare careers rises, online education offers flexible and accessible pathways beyond traditional medical school. Many accredited universities now provide high-quality options for those pursuing advanced healthcare roles. For instance, nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners or specialist leaders can consider the cheapest dnp programs online, delivering a Doctor of Nursing Practice with flexible scheduling and affordable pricing.

Pharmacists are also in high demand and can complete their pharmacy degree online through some of the nation’s most reputable programs. For those interested in health data, a him associate degree online can open doors to roles managing healthcare information systems and patient records.

Alternatively, many students fast-track their entry into the industry by completing medical billing and coding online courses—leading to essential jobs in healthcare administration. With diverse online options available, it's easier than ever to build a healthcare career tailored to your strengths and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Gordon K. Danielson