World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William G. Williams

William G. Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
37857
World Ranking
6312
National Ranking
250

William G. Williams publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William G. Williams sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 483 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William G. Williams D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William G. Williams sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William G. Williams is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with particular emphasis on several subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, and Immunology.

Their main topics of study include:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Williams has contributed to numerous scientific papers published in various recognized venues, including:

  • World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • Cancer Research
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Recent papers authored by Williams or associated with their research work include:

  • "Outcomes after anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery repair: A Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society Study" (2020), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • "Anomalous Aortic Origin of a Coronary Artery in Adults" (2020), The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • "Evolving concern: Late outcomes after repair of transposition of the great arteries" (2024), Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • "Two Decades of Department of Veterans Affairs Traumatic Brain Injury Care and Benefits for Veterans of Post-9/11 Conflicts" (2024), Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • "The Early History of the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society" (2023), World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery

Their collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Giuseppe Del Priore, Charles L. Wiseman, Mingjin Chang, Saranya Chumsri, and Blaise Bayer.

Williams has also published book content, including a work with Transportation Research Board eBooks titled "Evaluation of Bridge Rail Systems to Confirm AASHTO MASH Compliance" (2022).

Best Publications

  • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Clinical Spectrum and Treatment

    Wigle Ed;Rakowski H;Kimball Bp;Williams Wg

  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The importance of the site and the extent of hypertrophy. A review

    E.Douglas Wigle;Zion Sasson;Mark A. Henderson;Terrence D. Ruddy

  • Optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair

    Judith Therrien;Yves Provost;Naeem Merchant;William Williams

  • Pulmonary valve replacement in adults late after repair of tetralogy of fallot: are we operating too late?

    Judith Therrien;Samuel C Siu;Peter R McLaughlin;Peter P Liu

  • Impact of Pulmonary Valve Replacement on Arrhythmia Propensity Late After Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot

    J. Therrien;S. C. Siu;L. Harris;A. Dore

  • Arrhythmia and Mortality After the Mustard Procedure: A 30-Year Single-Center Experience

    Mark Gelatt;Robert M Hamilton;Brian W McCrindle;Michael Connelly

  • Clinical and Echocardiographic Determinants of Long-Term Survival After Surgical Myectomy in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Anna Woo;William G. Williams;Richard Choi;E. Douglas Wigle

  • Pediatric primary benign cardiac tumors: A 15-year review

    Maurice Beghetti MDa;Robert M. Gow;Isabel Haney;John Mawson

  • Sustained ventricular tachycardia in adult patients late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

    David A Harrison;Louise Harris;Samuel C Siu;Cynthia J MacLoghlin

  • Reoperation in adults with repair of tetralogy of fallot: indications and outcomes.

    Erwin N. Oechslin;David A. Harrison;Louise Harris;Eugene Downar

  • Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the adult: Functional status and complications

    Michael S. Connelly;Peter P. Liu;William G. Williams;Gary D. Webb

  • Outcomes after the Norwood operation in neonates with critical aortic stenosis or aortic valve atresia.

    David A. Ashburn;Brian W. McCrindle;Christo I. Tchervenkov;Marshall L. Jacobs

  • Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate: A multi-institutional study of management, outcomes, and risk factors

    Gary K. Lofland;Brian W. McCrindle;William G. Williams;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Evolving strategies and improving outcomes of the modified Norwood procedure. A 10-year single-institution experience

    Anthony Azakie;Sandra L. Merklinger;Brian W. McCrindle;Glen S. Van Arsdell

  • Late risk of outcomes for adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot from an inception cohort spanning four decades.

    Edward J. Hickey;Gruschen Veldtman;Timothy J. Bradley;Aungkana Gengsakul

  • Arrhythmia and survival in patients >18 years of age after the mustard procedure for complete transposition of the great arteries.

    Geoff Puley;Samuel Siu;Michael Connelly;David Harrison

  • Risk factors for atrial tachyarrhythmias after the fontan operation

    Mark Gelatt;Robert M. Hamilton;Brian W. McCrindle;Robert M. Gow

  • Determinants of mortality and type of repair in neonates with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum

    David A Ashburn;Eugene H Blackstone;Winfield J Wells;Richard A Jonas

  • Factors Associated With Mortality and Reoperation in 377 Children With Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection

    Tara Karamlou;Rebecca Gurofsky;Eisar Al Sukhni;John G. Coles

  • Heparin Therapy in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

    Maureen Andrew;Velma Marzinotto;Patti Massicotte;Victor Blanchette

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian W. McCrindle
Brian W. McCrindle University of Toronto
Robert M. Freedom
Robert M. Freedom University of Toronto
Lee N. Benson
Lee N. Benson University of Toronto
Jeffrey F. Smallhorn
Jeffrey F. Smallhorn University of Alberta
Eugene H. Blackstone
Eugene H. Blackstone Cleveland Clinic
Gary D. Webb
Gary D. Webb Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Jagdish Butany
Jagdish Butany University Health Network
Richard D. Weisel
Richard D. Weisel University Health Network
Maureen Andrew
Maureen Andrew University of Toronto
Marlene Rabinovitch
Marlene Rabinovitch Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of medicine in the USA can open doors to various rewarding career pathways beyond the traditional MD route. For those interested in pharmacy, several pharm d online programs provide the flexibility to earn a Doctor of Pharmacy from home, which is ideal for busy professionals looking to advance their qualifications.

Students interested in healthcare administration can consider an online health information management degree. These programs prepare graduates for in-demand roles managing patient data and healthcare systems, blending clinical knowledge with technology and business skills.

The demand for skilled professionals in billing and coding is growing. Understanding medical coding certification cost can help students budget for this fast-track career, where online courses make entry more affordable and accessible.

If you are interested in advanced clinical practice, look into the cheapest np programs online to become a nurse practitioner. These programs offer flexible and cost-effective ways to enter a vital healthcare role with strong job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing William G. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles