World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2869 37 240 12928
Neuroscience 65 3152 32 272 13279

Peter Mariën publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Mariën between 1991 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Mariën published across 33 years, from 1991 to 2023, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2015. 4 of the 290 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2015. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 8 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications
1991 2023

290 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Mariën: publications per year, 1991 to 2023
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 4
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 2
1998 3
1999 1
2000 8
2001 10
2002 5
2003 7
2004 10
2005 12
2006 16
2007 11
2008 15
2009 5
2010 11
2011 9
2012 10
2013 23
2014 19
2015 30
2016 28
2017 18
2018 11
2019 7
2020 2
2021 2
2022 2
2023 2
Total 290
Download as CSV

Peter Mariën publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Mariën sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 240 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 240
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Mariën D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Mariën sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Mariën is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. Their research spans the fields of psychology, neuroscience, and medicine, with a specific focus on cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, dementia and cognitive impairment research, reading and literacy development, hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

Peter Mariën has contributed to several recent publications including:

  • Dutch Diagnostic Instrument for Mild Aphasia (DIMA): standardisation and a first clinical application in two brain tumour patients, 2022, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
  • Optimizing Magnetoencephalographic Imaging Estimation of Language Lateralization for Simpler Language Tasks, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Functional Foreign Accent Syndrome in suspected Conversion Disorder: A case study, 2020, The European Journal of Psychiatry
  • Embodying Stressful Events: No Difference in Subjective Arousal and Neural Correlates Related to Immersion, Interoception, and Embodied Mentalization, 2021, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Diagnostic Instrument for Mild Aphasia, 2022, PsycTESTS Dataset

Frequent publication venues include Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, The European Journal of Psychiatry, and PsycTESTS Dataset.

Notable frequent co-authors are Elke De Witte, Roelien Bastiaanse, Frank Van Overwalle, Djaina Satoer, and Bram Bulté.

Best Publications

  • Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

    Mario Manto;James M. Bower;Adriana Bastos Conforto;José M. Delgado-García

  • Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Emotion

    M Adamaszek;Federico D'Agata;R. Ferrucci;C. Habas

  • Consensus Paper: Language and the Cerebellum: an Ongoing Enigma

    Peter Mariën;Herman Ackermann;Michael Adamaszek;Caroline H S Barwood

  • Social cognition and the cerebellum: a meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies.

    Frank Van Overwalle;Kris Baetens;Peter Mariën;Marie Vandekerckhove

  • The lateralized linguistic cerebellum: A review and a new hypothesis

    Peter Marien;Sebastiaan Engelborghs;Franco Fabbro;Peter P. De Deyn

  • Cerebellar neurocognition: insights into the bottom of the brain.

    Hanne Baillieux;Hyo Jung De Smet;Philippe Paquier;Philippe Paquier;Peter Paul De Deyn

  • Consensus Paper: Revisiting the Symptoms and Signs of Cerebellar Syndrome

    Florian Bodranghien;Amy Bastian;Carlo Casali;Mark Hallett

  • Developmental Foreign Accent Syndrome : Report of a new case

    Stefanie Keulen;Stefanie Keulen;Peter Mariën;Peggy Wackenier;Roel Jonkers

  • The cerebellum: Its role in language and related cognitive and affective functions

    Hyo Jung De Smet;Philippe Paquier;Jo J. Verhoeven;Peter Mariën

  • Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta‐analytic connectivity analysis

    Frank Van Overwalle;Tine D'aes;Peter Mariën

  • Cognitive and affective disturbances following focal cerebellar damage in adults: a neuropsychological and SPECT study.

    Hanne Baillieux;Hyo Jung De Smet;André Dobbeleir;Philippe Paquier;Philippe Paquier

  • Schmahmann’s syndrome - identification of the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology

    Mario Manto;Peter Mariën

  • Normative data for the Boston naming test in native Dutch-speaking Belgian elderly.

    Peter Marien;E Mampaey;A Vervaet;J. Saerens

  • Neurobiochemical Markers of Brain Damage in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

    Raf Brouns;Raf Brouns;Bart De Vil;Patrick Cras;Didier De Surgeloose

  • Mindfulness based intervention in Parkinson's disease leads to structural brain changes on MRI A randomized controlled longitudinal trial

    Barbara A. Pickut;Wim Van Hecke;Wim Van Hecke;Eric Kerckhofs;Peter Mariën

  • Functional connectivity between the cerebrum and cerebellum in social cognition: A multi-study analysis

    Frank Van Overwalle;Peter Mariën

  • Prospective Belgian study of neurodegenerative and vascular dementia: APOE genotype effects

    S Engelborghs;Bart Dermaut;J Goeman;J Saerens

  • The Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol: a valid linguistic approach to awake brain surgery.

    E De Witte;D Satoer;E Robert;H Colle

  • Cerebellar induced aphasia: case report of cerebellar induced prefrontal aphasic language phenomena supported by SPECT findings

    Peter Marien;J. Saerens;R Nanhoe;E Moens

  • Depression in Mild Cognitive Impairment is associated with Progression to Alzheimer's Disease: A Longitudinal Study

    Stefan Van der Mussele;Erik Fransen;Hanne Struyfs;Jill Luyckx

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Paul De Deyn
Peter Paul De Deyn University of Antwerp
Sebastiaan Engelborghs
Sebastiaan Engelborghs Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Mario Manto
Mario Manto University of Mons
Roelien Bastiaanse
Roelien Bastiaanse University of Groningen
Frank Van Overwalle
Frank Van Overwalle Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Marie Vandekerckhove
Marie Vandekerckhove Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Jubin Abutalebi
Jubin Abutalebi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Paul M. Parizel
Paul M. Parizel University of Western Australia
Wouter Duyck
Wouter Duyck Ghent University
Patrick Cras
Patrick Cras University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology, counseling, or related fields. With the growth of online education, you can now earn fully accredited degrees from the comfort of your home, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

If your goal is to become a licensed therapist, it’s important to understand that licensure requirements vary by location. For example, you can explore Denver licensed therapist requirements to understand the steps in Colorado. Similarly, reviewing Detroit licensed therapist requirements will give insight into what’s expected in Michigan. If you’re interested in North Carolina, the process for how to become a licensed therapist in Durham provides a helpful overview. For those in Texas, El Paso licensed therapist education requirements outlines the necessary educational and clinical experience needed.

By researching these pathways, you’ll better understand the educational and practical steps needed to pursue a successful psychology career—no matter where you plan to live or work.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Mariën

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles