World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
19829
World Ranking
18831
National Ranking
632

Paul M. Parizel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Parizel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 648 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul M. Parizel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Parizel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Tuberculosis of the central nervous system: overview of neuroradiological findings

    A. Bernaerts;F. M. Vanhoenacker;P. M. Parizel;J. W. M. Van Goethem

  • Case-mix, care pathways, and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in CENTER-TBI: a European prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, cohort study

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Eveline Wiegers;Charlie Sewalt;Andras Buki

  • How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee

    Jan Victor;D Van Doninck;Luc Labey;Bernardo Innocenti

  • Imaging findings in diffuse axonal injury after closed head trauma

    P. M. Parizel;Ö. Özsarlak;J. W. Van Goethem;L. van den Hauwe

  • Intracranial hemorrhage: principles of CT and MRI interpretation

    P. M. Parizel;S. Makkat;E. Van Miert;J. W. Van Goethem

  • Early Diagnosis of Cerebral Fat Embolism Syndrome by Diffusion-Weighted MRI (Starfield Pattern)

    P.M. Parizel;H.E. Demey;G. Veeckmans;F. Verstreken

  • A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging

    Robin M. Heidemann;Özkan Özsarlak;Paul M. Parizel;Johan Michiels

  • Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging of spinal tumors.

    P M Parizel;D Balériaux;G Rodesch;C Segebarth

  • The Radiology Report as Seen by Radiologists and Referring Clinicians: Results of the COVER and ROVER Surveys

    Jan M. L. Bosmans;Joost J. Weyler;Arthur M. De Schepper;Paul M. Parizel

  • Nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism

    P G Jorens;E Van Marck;A Snoeckx;P M Parizel

  • Trauma of the spine and spinal cord: imaging strategies

    P. M. Parizel;T. van der Zijden;S. Gaudino;M. Spaepen

  • Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics in CT-based Airway Models with SPECT/CT

    Jan W. De Backer;Wim G. Vos;Samir C. Vinchurkar;Rita Claes

  • Feasibility of tissue magnetic resonance imaging: A pilot study in comparison with tissue Doppler imaging and invasive measurement

    Bernard P. Paelinck;Albert de Roos;Jeroen J. Bax;Johan M. Bosmans

  • The course of diaphragm atrophy in ventilated patients assessed with ultrasound: a longitudinal cohort study

    Tom Schepens;Walter Verbrugghe;Karolien Dams;Bob Corthouts

  • European Society of Radiology (ESR)

    Paul M. Parizel

  • Mindfulness based intervention in Parkinson's disease leads to structural brain changes on MRI A randomized controlled longitudinal trial

    Barbara A. Pickut;Wim Van Hecke;Wim Van Hecke;Eric Kerckhofs;Peter Mariën

  • MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications

    Özkan Özsarlak;Johan W. Van Goethem;Menno Maes;Paul M. Parizel

  • Clinical MR imaging

    Peter Reimer;Paul M. Parizel;Falko-A. Stichnoth

  • Partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: injury patterns on MR imaging

    Pieter Van Dyck;Eline De Smet;Jan Veryser;Valérie Lambrecht

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Sijbers
Jan Sijbers University of Antwerp
Patrick Cras
Patrick Cras University of Antwerp
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Steven Laureys
Steven Laureys University of Liège
Paul Van de Heyning
Paul Van de Heyning University of Antwerp
Berten Ceulemans
Berten Ceulemans University of Antwerp
Sebastiaan Engelborghs
Sebastiaan Engelborghs Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Ewout W. Steyerberg
Ewout W. Steyerberg Leiden University Medical Center
Athena Demertzi
Athena Demertzi University of Liège

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing Medicine but would prefer a flexible and affordable path, several related online degrees and healthcare careers may be a great fit. For example, many best online schools for high school students offer introductory programs in health information management—ideal for those wishing to explore the healthcare field early on.

Administrative roles like medical billing and coding are in high demand, and you can complete billing and coding classes online for a quick entry into the healthcare workforce. For those wanting to become advanced practitioners, there are also cheapest fnp programs that allow you to specialize as a Family Nurse Practitioner completely online.

Aspiring registered nurses interested in leadership or advanced clinical practice can consider the cheapest online msn programs for a Master of Science in Nursing. These flexible options make it easier for working professionals or career changers to advance in healthcare without leaving their current jobs.

By exploring these related online degrees, you can find practical, affordable, and respected pathways to a rewarding healthcare career—even if you aren’t pursuing a traditional medical degree.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Parizel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles