World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
49539
World Ranking
3629
National Ranking
2003

Lewis C. Becker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lewis C. Becker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 555 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lewis C. Becker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lewis C. Becker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lewis C. Becker is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their research spans across the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with specific focus on Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Hematology, and Physiology.

The scientist's recent publications include work on large-scale genome sequencing and genetic epidemiology. Notable papers are:

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program (2021, Nature)
  • Inherited causes of clonal haematopoiesis in 97,691 whole genomes (2020, Nature)
  • Assessing the contribution of rare variants to complex trait heritability from whole-genome sequence data (2022, Nature Genetics)
  • Dynamic incorporation of multiple in silico functional annotations empowers rare variant association analysis of large whole-genome sequencing studies at scale (2020, Nature Genetics)
  • Clonal haematopoiesis and risk of chronic liver disease (2023, Nature)

Their work addresses topics including Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Platelet Disorders and Treatments, Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence, as well as Epigenetics and DNA Methylation.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Lisa R. Yanek, Eric Boerwinkle, Laura M. Raffield, Jennifer A. Brody, and Stephen S. Rich. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse range of studies within their areas of expertise.

Publication venues frequently featuring their work include UNC Libraries, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Stroke, Nature Communications, and Nature. Their contributions have appeared extensively in these outlets, reflecting a broad engagement with both preprint and peer-reviewed scientific literature.

In addition to research articles, Lewis C. Becker has contributed to academic literature through book publications, including "Hamiltonian Systems," published by Cambridge University Press in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program.

    Daniel Taliun;Daniel N. Harris;Michael D. Kessler;Jedidiah Carlson;Jedidiah Carlson

  • Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease

    Heribert Schunkert;Inke R. König;Sekar Kathiresan;Muredach P. Reilly

  • Genome-wide association yields new sequence variants at seven loci that associate with measures of obesity

    Gudmar Thorleifsson;G Bragi Walters;Daniel F Gudbjartsson;Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir

  • A Polymorphism of a Platelet Glycoprotein Receptor as an Inherited Risk Factor for Coronary Thrombosis

    Ethan J. Weiss;Paul F. Bray;Matthew Tayback;Steven P. Schulman

  • Exercise cardiac output is maintained with advancing age in healthy human subjects: cardiac dilatation and increased stroke volume compensate for a diminished heart rate.

    R J Rodeheffer;G Gerstenblith;L C Becker;J L Fleg

  • Impaired chronotropic and vasodilator reserves limit exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction.

    Barry A. Borlaug;Vojtech Melenovsky;Stuart D. Russell;Kristy Kessler

  • Many sequence variants affecting diversity of adult human height

    Daniel F Gudbjartsson;G Bragi Walters;Gudmar Thorleifsson;Hreinn Stefansson

  • Nitric oxide synthase in cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum

    Kai Y. Xu;David L. Huso;Ted M. Dawson;David S. Bredt

  • Inherited causes of clonal haematopoiesis in 97,691 whole genomes.

    Alexander G Bick;Joshua S Weinstock;Satish K Nandakumar;Satish K Nandakumar;Charles P Fulco;Charles P Fulco

  • Two-dimensional echocardiography and infarct size: relationship of regional wall motion and thickening to the extent of myocardial infarction in the dog.

    A N Lieberman;J L Weiss;B I Jugdutt;L C Becker

  • Progressive impairment of regional myocardial perfusion after initial restoration of postischemic blood flow.

    Giuseppe Ambrosio;Harlan F. Weisman;John A. Mannisi;Lewis C. Becker

  • Magnitude and Time Course of Microvascular Obstruction and Tissue Injury After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Carlos E. Rochitte;João A. C. Lima;David A. Bluemke;Scott B. Reeder

  • Physiological Basis of Myocardial Contrast Enhancement in Fast Magnetic Resonance Images of 2-Day-Old Reperfused Canine Infarcts

    Robert M. Judd;Carlos H. Lugo-Olivieri;Masazumi Arai;Takeshi Kondo

  • Sequencing of 53,831 diverse genomes from the NHLBI TOPMed Program

    Daniel Taliun;Daniel N. Harris;Michael D. Kessler;Jedidiah Carlson;Jedidiah Carlson

  • Animal models for protecting ischemic myocardium: results of the NHLBI cooperative study. Comparison of unconscious and conscious dog models

    K. A. Reimer;R. B. Jennings;F. R. Cobb;R. H. Murdock

  • L-arginine therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the Vascular Interaction With Age in Myocardial Infarction (VINTAGE MI) randomized clinical trial.

    Steven P. Schulman;Lewis C. Becker;David A. Kass;Hunter C. Champion

  • Effect of Ischemia and Antianginal Drugs on the Distribution of Radioactive Microspheres in the Canine Left Ventricle

    Lewis C. Becker;Nicholas J. Fortuin;Bertram Pitt

  • Reduction in experimental infarct size by recombinant human superoxide dismutase: insights into the pathophysiology of reperfusion injury.

    G Ambrosio;L C Becker;G M Hutchins;H F Weisman

  • Quantification and time course of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion

    Katherine C Wu;Raymond J Kim;David A Bluemke;Carlos E Rochitte

  • Myocardial Reperfusion Injury.

    Lewis C. Becker

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane M. Becker
Diane M. Becker Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Lisa R. Yanek
Lisa R. Yanek Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Dhananjay Vaidya
Dhananjay Vaidya Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Rasika A. Mathias
Rasika A. Mathias Johns Hopkins University
Gary Gerstenblith
Gary Gerstenblith Johns Hopkins University
Bernadine H. Bulkley
Bernadine H. Bulkley Johns Hopkins University
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Edward G. Lakatta
Edward G. Lakatta National Institutes of Health
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Alexander P. Reiner
Alexander P. Reiner University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional medical school routes, there are several alternative pathways and online degrees available for those interested in healthcare careers. Online nursing programs have gained popularity thanks to flexible study options and the ability to progress your career while balancing other commitments.

For students seeking advanced practice roles, pursuing one of the cheapest online fnp programs (Family Nurse Practitioner) can be a cost-effective way to access in-demand clinical positions. Additionally, aspiring nurses can start their journey by considering nursing school online, which can be more affordable and convenient than on-campus options.

For nurses aiming to reach the highest levels in their field, enrolling in the cheapest online dnp programs can provide a pathway to leadership and academic roles. Those who are already registered nurses may also consider an rn to bsn online cost comparison to advance their qualifications without breaking the bank.

Exploring these online degree options can open up various career pathways in healthcare, making it easier than ever to access rewarding roles in medicine and nursing.

Best Scientists Citing Lewis C. Becker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles