World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
37478
World Ranking
15385
National Ranking
7759

Gary Gerstenblith publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Gerstenblith sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 399 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gary Gerstenblith D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Gerstenblith sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary Gerstenblith is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States, with a research focus predominantly in the field of Medicine. Within this broad area, their work extensively covers subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Physiology.

The scientist's research spans multiple key topics, including:

  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • HIV-related Health Complications and Treatments
  • Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging

Gerstenblith has contributed papers to a variety of peer-reviewed journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • European Journal of Clinical Investigation

Some of the notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Gerstenblith are:

  • Sarcopenia and Cardiovascular Diseases, 2023, Circulation
  • Interventions for Frailty Among Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Frailty and cardiovascular outcomes in the National Health and Aging Trends Study, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Effect of Evolocumab on Atherogenic Lipoproteins During the Peri- and Early Postinfarction Period, 2020, Circulation
  • Exercise intolerance and rapid skeletal muscle energetic decline in human age-associated frailty, 2020, JCI Insight

The scientist has collaborated extensively with other researchers, with frequent co-authors being Thorsten M. Leucker, Chiadi E. Ndumele, Josef Coresh, Tarek Harb, and Roger S. Blumenthal.

In addition to journal publications, Gerstenblith has contributed to book publications, including the work titled Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly, published by Humana Press in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Neurohumoral Features of Myocardial Stunning Due to Sudden Emotional Stress

    Ilan S. Wittstein;David R. Thiemann;Joao A.C. Lima;Kenneth L. Baughman

  • Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial

    Raj R Makkar;Rachel R Smith;Ke Cheng;Konstantinos Malliaras

  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study of Intravenous Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Prochymal) After Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Joshua M. Hare;Jay H. Traverse;Timothy D. Henry;Nabil Dib

  • Comparison of allogeneic vs autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells delivered by transendocardial injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: The POSEIDON randomized trial

    Joshua M. Hare;Joel E. Fishman;Gary Gerstenblith;Darcy L. DiFede Velazquez

  • A Polymorphism of a Platelet Glycoprotein Receptor as an Inherited Risk Factor for Coronary Thrombosis

    Ethan J. Weiss;Paul F. Bray;Matthew Tayback;Steven P. Schulman

  • Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure

    Joel B Braunstein;Gerard F Anderson;Gary Gerstenblith;Wendy Weller

  • Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

    André Schmidt;Clerio F. Azevedo;Alan Cheng;Sandeep N. Gupta

  • Exercise cardiac output is maintained with advancing age in healthy human subjects: cardiac dilatation and increased stroke volume compensate for a diminished heart rate.

    R J Rodeheffer;G Gerstenblith;L C Becker;J L Fleg

  • Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina.

    S O Gottlieb;M L Weisfeldt;P Ouyang;E D Mellits

  • Relative Roles of Direct Regeneration Versus Paracrine Effects of Human Cardiosphere-Derived Cells Transplanted Into Infarcted Mice

    Isotta Chimenti;Rachel Ruckdeschel Smith;Tao Sheng Li;Gary Gerstenblith

  • Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population.

    G. Gerstenblith;J. Frederiksen;F. C.P. Yin;N. J. Fortuin

  • Late Gadolinium Enhancement by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Heralds an Adverse Prognosis in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

    Katherine C. Wu;Robert G. Weiss;David R. Thiemann;Kakuya Kitagawa

  • Ethinyl estradiol acutely attenuates abnormal coronary vasomotor responses to acetylcholine in postmenopausal women.

    Steven E. Reis;Sean T. Gloth;Roger S. Blumenthal;Jon R. Resar

  • Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells after myocardial infarction: evidence of therapeutic regeneration in the final 1-year results of the CADUCEUS trial (CArdiosphere-Derived aUtologous stem CElls to reverse ventricUlar dySfunction).

    Konstantinos Malliaras;Raj R. Makkar;Rachel R. Smith;Ke Cheng

  • Impact of age on the cardiovascular response to dynamic upright exercise in healthy men and women.

    J. L. Fleg;F. O'Connor;G. Gerstenblith;L. C. Becker

  • L-arginine therapy in acute myocardial infarction: the Vascular Interaction With Age in Myocardial Infarction (VINTAGE MI) randomized clinical trial.

    Steven P. Schulman;Lewis C. Becker;David A. Kass;Hunter C. Champion

  • Engraftment, Differentiation, and Functional Benefits of Autologous Cardiosphere-Derived Cells in Porcine Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

    Peter V. Johnston;Tetsuo Sasano;Kevin Mills;Robert Evers

  • Lack of Benefit for Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Who Are Older Than 75 Years

    David R. Thiemann;Josef Coresh;Steven P. Schulman;Gary Gerstenblith

  • A randomized trial of the efficacy of multidisciplinary care in heart failure outpatients at high risk of hospital readmission

    Edward K Kasper;Gary Gerstenblith;Gail Hefter;Elizabeth Van Anden

  • Diminished inotropic response of aged myocardium to catecholamines.

    E. G. Lakatta;G. Gerstenblith;Charles S Angell;N. W. Shock

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward G. Lakatta
Edward G. Lakatta National Institutes of Health
Lewis C. Becker
Lewis C. Becker Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Roger S. Blumenthal
Roger S. Blumenthal Johns Hopkins University
Matthias Stuber
Matthias Stuber University of Lausanne
Gordon F. Tomaselli
Gordon F. Tomaselli Johns Hopkins University
Josef Coresh
Josef Coresh New York University
Jerome L. Fleg
Jerome L. Fleg National Institutes of Health
Elizabeth Selvin
Elizabeth Selvin Johns Hopkins University
Christie M. Ballantyne
Christie M. Ballantyne Baylor College of Medicine
Myron L. Weisfeldt
Myron L. Weisfeldt Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring alternative pathways related to studying Medicine in the USA, a range of online degrees and certifications can help you build a strong healthcare career. Many students consider becoming pharmacists, and there are accredited programs available—check out options for pharmacy school online accredited to see if this flexible route fits your goals.

Healthcare administration and technology are also rapidly growing areas. Earning a degree in health informatics can prepare you to analyze and manage medical data, or you can quickly gain entry into the workforce with a cheapest medical coding certification online.

Those interested in patient care but seeking more flexibility might explore online nurse practitioner programs. For an affordable way to qualify, review some of the cheapest online fnp programs available nationwide.

Each of these accredited online options offers unique benefits, allowing you to pursue a rewarding healthcare career from the comfort of your home.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Gerstenblith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles