World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
59
Citations
12429
World Ranking
4008
National Ranking
345

Ernst Pöppel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst Pöppel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 250 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ernst Pöppel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst Pöppel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1993 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Neurosciences
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

Ernst Pöppel is affiliated with the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and specializes primarily in the field of neuroscience. Their research spans various subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, sensory systems, and computer graphics and computer-aided design.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics related to brain function and perception, including:

  • Aesthetic perception and analysis
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and music perception
  • Creativity in education and neuroscience
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies
  • Digital media and visual art

Ernst Pöppel has contributed to studies published in multiple venues, with a particular concentration in the PsyCh Journal and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Other publication venues include Forschung & Lehre, Kursbuch, and the RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Literary Theory Linguistics Cultural Studies Series.

Recent publications include the following:

  • "Neuroaesthetics: The art, science, and brain triptych," 2020, PsyCh Journal
  • "Complementarity of mental content and logistic algorithms in a taxonomy of cognitive functions," 2022, PsyCh Journal
  • "Serial Dependence in Temporal Perception Reveals the Dynamics of Constructing an Internal Reference Frame," 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "An Aesthetic Frame for Three Modes of Knowing," 2022, PsyCh Journal
  • "Conscious vision in blindness: A new perceptual phenomenon implemented on the 'wrong' side of the brain," 2024, PsyCh Journal

Frequent collaborators in their research include Yan Bao, Xinchi Yu, Semir Zeki, Chen Zhao, and Вера Заботкина.

Throughout their career, Ernst Pöppel has received several recognitions: they became a member of the Academia Europaea in 2015 and of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts. They were also elected to the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 1993 for contributions to neurosciences.

Best Publications

  • Residual Visual Function after Brain Wounds involving the Central Visual Pathways in Man

    Ernst Pöppel;Richard Held;Douglas Frost

  • A hierarchical model of temporal perception

    Ernst Pöppel

  • Dopaminergic reward system: a short integrative review

    Oscar Arias-Carrión;Oscar Arias-Carrión;Maria Stamelou;Eric Murillo-Rodríguez;Manuel Menéndez-González

  • Dopamine, learning, and reward-seeking behavior.

    Óscar Arias-Carrión;Ernst Pöppel

  • Temporal integration in sensorimotor synchronization

    Jiří Mates;Ulrike Müller;Tomáš Radil;Ernst Pöppel

  • Temporal Mechanisms In Perception

    Ernst Pöppel

  • Pre-semantically defined temporal windows for cognitive processing.

    Ernst Pöppel

  • Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving

    Marc Wittmann;Miklós Kiss;Peter Gugg;Alexander Steffen

  • Different programming modes of human saccadic eye movements as a function of stimulus eccentricity: Indications of a functional subdivision of the visual field

    D. Frost;E. Pöppel

  • Auditory evoked potentials indicate the loss of neuronal oscillations during general anaesthesia

    Ch. Madler;E. Pöppel

  • Midlatency Auditory Evoked Potentials and Explicit and Implicit Memory in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

    D. Schwender;A. Kaiser;S. Klasing;K. Peter

  • Temporal processing deficits in high-functioning children with autism.

    Elzbieta Szelag;Joanna Kowalska;Tadeusz Galkowski;Ernst Pöppel

  • Lost in time: a historical frame, elementary processing units and the 3-second window.

    Ernst Pöppel

  • SENSORY INFORMATION PROCESSING DURING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA: EFFECT OF ISOFLURANE ON AUDITORY EVOKED NEURONAL OSCILLATIONS

    C. Madler;I. Keller;D. Schwender;E. Pöppel

  • Two types of anticipation in synchronization tapping

    Yoshihiro Miyake;Yohei Onishi;Ernst Pöppel

  • Inhibitory interaction in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus.

    Wolf Singer;Ernst Pöppel;Otto Creutzfeldt

  • Sensory integration within temporally neutral systems states: A hypothesis

    E. Pöppel;K. Schill;N. von Steinbüchel

  • Excitability cycles in central intermittency.

    Ernst Pöppel

  • Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences.

    Yi-Huang Su;Ernst Pöppel

  • Neuronal oscillations in the human brain. Discontinuous initiations of pursuit eye movements indicate a 30-Hz temporal framework for visual information processing

    E. Pöppel;N. Logothetis

Frequent Co-Authors

Maximilian F. Reiser
Maximilian F. Reiser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Thomas Meindl
Thomas Meindl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Marc Wittmann
Marc Wittmann Institut für Grenzgebiete der Psychologie und Psychohygiene
Josef Zihl
Josef Zihl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Shihui Han
Shihui Han Peking University
Till Roenneberg
Till Roenneberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolf Singer
Wolf Singer Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Nikos K. Logothetis
Nikos K. Logothetis Chinese Academy of Sciences
Oscar Arias-Carrión
Oscar Arias-Carrión Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación
Dieter Frey
Dieter Frey Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ernst Pöppel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles