World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
10849
World Ranking
9020
National Ranking
4784

Mark G. Haviland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Haviland sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 105 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark G. Haviland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark G. Haviland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark G. Haviland is affiliated with Loma Linda University in the United States. Their research output encompasses several domains, with a particular focus on psychometric methodologies and testing, as well as mental health and behavioral health topics.

Haviland's recent published papers highlight a strong interest in psychometric models and measurement approaches within psychological and health-related contexts. Key publications include:

  • Matching IRT Models to Patient-Reported Outcomes Constructs: The Graded Response and Log-Logistic Models for Scaling Depression (2021, Psychometrika)
  • Response Category Functioning on the Health Care Engagement Measure Using the Nominal Response Model (2021, Assessment)
  • Understanding Alpha and Beta and Sources of Common Variance: Theoretical Underpinnings and a Practical Example (2024, Journal of Personality Assessment)
  • 20.7 PARENTAL ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES AND OFFSPRING DEVELOPMENT AT 30 MONTHS OF AGE (2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry)
  • Acknowledgment of Ad Hoc Reviewers (2020, Psychological Assessment)

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Haviland include:

  • Steven P. Reise
  • Emily Wong
  • Anne S. Hubbard
  • Benjamin D. Schalet
  • Rachel Kimerling

Haviland's studies have appeared regularly in journals recognized for research in psychological assessment and child development, with frequent publication venues such as:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Psychological Assessment
  • Psychometrika
  • Assessment
  • Journal of Personality Assessment

The scientist's work spans several subfields of study including:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Sociology and Political Science

Key research topics addressed through their published work include:

  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Best Publications

  • Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.

    Anthony Rodriguez;Steven P. Reise;Mark G. Haviland

  • Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to Which Multidimensional Data Yield Univocal Scale Scores

    Steven P. Reise;Tyler M. Moore;Mark G. Haviland

  • Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality

    Steven P. Reise;Wes E. Bonifay;Mark G. Haviland

  • Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.

    Anthony Rodriguez;Steven P. Reise;Mark G. Haviland

  • Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation Modeling: A Bifactor Perspective

    Steven P. Reise;Richard Scheines;Keith F. Widaman;Mark G. Haviland

  • Dimensions of alexithymia and their relationships to anxiety and depression.

    Michael S. Hendryx;Mark G. Haviland;Dale G. Shaw

  • Alexithymia in women and men hospitalized for psychoactive substance dependence

    Mark G. Haviland;Mark G. Haviland;Mark G. Haviland;Michael S. Hendryx;Michael S. Hendryx;Michael S. Hendryx;Dale G. Shaw;Dale G. Shaw;Dale G. Shaw;James P. Henry;James P. Henry;James P. Henry

  • AN OBSERVER SCALE TO MEASURE ALEXITHYMIA

    Mark G. Haviland;W. Louise Warren;Matt L. Riggs

  • Item Response Theory Fundamentals, Applications, and Promise in Psychological Research

    Steven P. Reise;Andrew T. Ainsworth;Mark G. Haviland

  • The Medical Condition Regard Scale: Measuring Reactions to Diagnoses

    George W. Christison;Mark G. Haviland;Matt L. Riggs

  • Item Response Theory and the Measurement of Clinical Change

    Steven P. Reise;Mark G. Haviland

  • Structure of the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale.

    Mark G. Haviland;Steven P. Reise

  • Child Maltreatment, Alexithymia, and Problematic Internet Use in Young Adulthood

    Tuppett M. Yates;Margo A. Gregor;Mark G. Haviland

  • Validation of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale with substance abusers.

    Mark G. Haviland;Dale G. Shaw;James P. MacMurray;Michael A. Cummings

  • Alexithymia: Subscales and Relationship to Depression

    Mark G. Haviland;Dale G. Shaw;Michael A. Cummings;James P. MacMurray

  • Multidimensionality and state dependency of alexithymia in recently sober alcoholics.

    Mark G. Haviland;Michael S. Hendryx;Michael A. Cummings;Dale G. Shaw

  • Yates's correction for continuity and the analysis of 2 x 2 contingency tables.

    Mark G. Haviland

  • Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction With Health Care

    Mark G. Haviland;Leo S. Morales;Thomas H. Dial;Harold Alan Pincus

  • A California Q-set alexithymia prototype and its relationship to ego-control and ego-resiliency

    Mark G. Haviland;Steven P. Reise

  • Observer- and self-rated alexithymia in eating disorder patients: levels and correspondence among three measures.

    Sylvie Berthoz;Fabienne Perdereau;Nathalie Godart;Maurice Corcos

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven P. Reise
Steven P. Reise University of California, Los Angeles
Harold Alan Pincus
Harold Alan Pincus Columbia University
Gary E. Fraser
Gary E. Fraser Loma Linda University
Leo S. Morales
Leo S. Morales University of Washington
Tyler M. Moore
Tyler M. Moore University of Pennsylvania
Sylvie Berthoz
Sylvie Berthoz Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Shuqiao Yao
Shuqiao Yao Central South University
M. Robin DiMatteo
M. Robin DiMatteo University of California, Riverside
Diane F. Halpern
Diane F. Halpern Claremont McKenna College
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As psychology continues to evolve as a field, online degrees have become a flexible and popular choice for students. For those interested in counseling, there are a variety of online programs designed to meet different learning needs and career goals. Many students seek out the easiest online counseling master’s programs in Pennsylvania to start their educational journey with manageable course loads and support-friendly formats.

On a broader national scale, the easiest counseling online master’s programs in USA and other accessible degree pathways allow candidates from any state to balance work, family, and education. Some options, like the easiest counseling online programs in USA, provide fast-tracked curricula or emphasize career-relevant skills, helping graduates prepare for roles in mental health services, school counseling, and more.

Additionally, students in specific states may seek regionally convenient options, such as the easiest online counseling degrees in Virginia. Exploring these related degrees can open career pathways in therapy, social work, human resources, and other growing fields that value strong psychological expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Mark G. Haviland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles