World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
119
Citations
67735
World Ranking
338
National Ranking
213

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
69870
World Ranking
3684
National Ranking
2027

Paul I. Terasaki publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul I. Terasaki sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 897 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Paul I. Terasaki D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul I. Terasaki sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul I. Terasaki was affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their career was marked by a focus that is indicated primarily through their institutional association.

While detailed records of research publications, coauthors, or specific fields of study are not available, the academic profile reflects a background connected to higher education and research in a prominent American university setting.

The absence of listed papers, main fields of study, subfields, topics of work, or frequent publication venues suggests limited publicly accessible bibliometric data in this context. However, the affiliation with UCLA indicates involvement in an environment known for biomedical and life sciences research among other disciplines.

No information regarding awards or book publications was documented in the provided data.

Best Publications

  • Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 2010.

    S G. E. Marsh;E. D. Albert;W. F. Bodmer;R. E. Bontrop

  • Microdroplet Assay of Human Serum Cytotoxins

    Paul I. Terasaki;John D. McCLELLAND

  • Significance of the positive crossmatch test in kidney transplantation.

    Ramon Patel;Paul I. Terasaki

  • High Association of an HL-A Antigen, W27, with Ankylosing Spondylitis

    Lee Schlosstein;Paul I. Terasaki;Rodney Bluestone;Carl M. Pearson

  • The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry.

    J M Cecka;P I Terasaki

  • Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 1995

    J G Bodmer;S G Marsh;Albert;W F Bodmer

  • Effect of pravastatin on outcomes after cardiac transplantation.

    J A Kobashigawa;S Katznelson;H Laks;J A Johnson

  • High survival rates of kidney transplants from spousal and living unrelated donors.

    P I Terasaki;J M Cecka;D W Gjertson;S Takemoto

  • Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 1994

    Julia G. Bodmer;Steven G. E. Marsh;Ekkehard D. Albert;Walter F. Bodmer

  • Serotyping for homotransplantation. 18. Refinement of microdroplet lymphocyte cytotoxicity test.

    Mittal Kk;Mickey Mr;Singal Dp;Terasaki Pi

  • Microdroplet testing for HLA-A, -B, -C, and -D antigens. The Phillip Levine Award Lecture.

    Paul I. Terasaki;Domenico Bernoco;Min Sik Park;Gungor Ozturk

  • Kidney preservation for transportation: initial perfusion and 30 hours ice storage

    G M Collins;M Bravo-Shugarman;P I Terasaki

  • HLA and disease associations

    Jawahar L. Tiwari;Paul I. Terasaki

  • Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 2004

    Steven G.E. Marsh;E. D. Albert;W. F. Bodmer;R. E. Bontrop

  • Humoral Theory of Transplantation

    Paul I. Terasaki

  • Characterization of Sialosylated Lewisx as a New Tumor-associated Antigen

    Kiyoyasu Fukushima;Masaki Hirota;Paul I. Terasaki;Akemi Wakisaka

  • Reactivity of Lymphocytes from Normal Persons on Cultured Tumor Cells

    Mitsuo Takasugi;Max R. Mickey;Paul I. Terasaki

  • Predicting kidney graft failure by HLA antibodies: a prospective trial.

    Paul I. Terasaki;Miyuki Ozawa

  • Single human leukocyte antigen flow cytometry beads for accurate identification of human leukocyte antigen antibody specificities.

    Rui Pei;Jar-How Lee;Neng-Jen Shih;Mike Chen

  • Improvement of kidney-graft survival with increased numbers of blood transfusions.

    Gerhard Opelz;Paul I. Terasaki

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerhard Opelz
Gerhard Opelz Heidelberg University
David Chia
David Chia University of California, Los Angeles
Thomas E. Starzl
Thomas E. Starzl University of Pittsburgh
Walter F. Bodmer
Walter F. Bodmer University of Oxford
Peter Parham
Peter Parham Stanford University
Ekkehard D. Albert
Ekkehard D. Albert Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jack L. Strominger
Jack L. Strominger Harvard University
Steven G.E. Marsh
Steven G.E. Marsh University College London
Goran B. Klintmalm
Goran B. Klintmalm Baylor University Medical Center
Ronald W. Busuttil
Ronald W. Busuttil University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse healthcare careers. For example, nurse practitioners with specialized skills play a critical role in patient care, and many pursue advanced education through programs like the cheapest psych np programs online. These affordable options make it easier for professionals to enter mental health fields while complementing their immunological expertise.

Salary potential is another important consideration. Understanding how much does a dnp make can help guide career decisions, especially as nurse practitioners with doctorates often achieve higher earnings compared to other roles in healthcare.

Specializing further is also possible, such as transitioning from family nurse practitioner roles to more critical settings. Resources like acute care nurse practitioner programs provide insight into pathways for advanced practice in acute and critical care environments.

For those aiming to accelerate their nursing careers, accelerated np program options offer intensive curriculums designed to fast-track licensure and specialization, making them ideal for busy professionals looking to expand their qualifications efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Paul I. Terasaki

Recently Published Articles