World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
35019
World Ranking
13932
National Ranking
7071

Barnett S. Kramer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barnett S. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 274 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Barnett S. Kramer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barnett S. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barnett S. Kramer is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Nursing. The main topics covered by their work include seed and plant biochemistry, microbial metabolites in food biotechnology, microbial metabolic engineering and bioproduction, global cancer incidence and screening, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, effects of radiation exposure, and plant gene expression analysis.

Their recent publications illustrate a wide range of scientific inquiry. These include:

  • Cancer overdiagnosis: A challenge in the era of screening (2022), published in Journal of the National Cancer Center
  • Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis of the Response of Quinoa Seedlings to Low Temperatures (2022), published in Biomolecules
  • Grain color formation and analysis of correlated genes by metabolome and transcriptome in different wheat lines at maturity (2023), published in Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Responses to waterlogging stress in quinoa seedlings based on metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis (2022), published in Environmental and Experimental Botany
  • Integration of transcriptome and metabolome reveals the accumulation of related metabolites and gene regulation networks during quinoa seed development (2024), published in Plant Molecular Biology

Contributions have appeared frequently in scientific venues such as:

  • Biomolecules
  • Journal of the National Cancer Center
  • Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Environmental and Experimental Botany
  • Plant Molecular Biology

Collaborative efforts form an integral part of their work, with frequent coauthors including Junna Liu, Li Li, Qianchao Wang, Ping Zhang, and Hanxue Li.

Their research intersects multiple subfields such as food science, nutrition and dietetics, molecular biology, genetics, and plant science. This interdisciplinary approach supports investigations into biochemical processes in seeds and plants, the role of microbial metabolites in biotechnology, and molecular responses to environmental stresses in crops.

Barnett S. Kramer's work also addresses medical and public health concerns including cancer screening, genetic mutation implications, and the impact of radiation exposure, reflecting the diversity of their scholarly activities across biological and medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening Trial

    Gerald L. Andriole;E. David Crawford;Robert L. Grubb;Saundra S. Buys

  • Design and Endpoints of Clinical Trials in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

    Josep M. Llovet;Adrian M. Di Bisceglie;Jordi Bruix;Barnett S. Kramer

  • Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Saundra S. Buys;Edward Partridge;Amanda Black;Christine C. Johnson

  • Prostate Cancer Screening in the Randomized Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial: Mortality Results after 13 Years of Follow-up

    Gerald L. Andriole;E. David Crawford;Robert L. Grubb;Saundra S. Buys

  • The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design

    Constantine A. Gatsonis;Denise R. Aberle;Christine D. Berg;William C. Black

  • Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

    Robert E. Schoen;Paul F. Pinsky;Joel L. Weissfeld;Lance A. Yokochi

  • The Role of Increasing Detection in the Rising Incidence of Prostate Cancer

    Arnold L. Potosky;Barry A. Miller;Peter C. Albertsen;Barnett S. Kramer

  • Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer

    Edward F. Patz;Paul Pinsky;Constantine Gatsonis;Jo Rean D. Sicks

  • Ovarian Cancer: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up

    Vicki Seltzer;Bruce H. Drukker;Brenda W. Gillespie;Lynn M. Gossfeld

  • Screening by Chest Radiograph and Lung Cancer Mortality: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Randomized Trial

    Martin M. Oken;Willam G. Hocking;Paul A. Kvale;Gerald L. Andriole

  • The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: History, organization, and status

    John K. Gohagan;Philip C. Prorok;Richard B. Hayes;Barnett S. Kramer

  • Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness

    H. Gilbert Welch;Philip C. Prorok;A. James O’Malley;Barnett S. Kramer

  • Trends in biomarker research for cancer detection.

    Pothur R Srinivas;Barnett S Kramer;Sudhir Srivastava

  • Potential Role of Tamoxifen in Prevention of Breast Cancer

    Susan G. Nayfield;Judith E. Karp;Leslie G. Ford;F. Andrew Dorr

  • Impact of air filtration on nosocomial Aspergillus infections. Unique risk of bone marrow transplant recipients.

    Robert J. Sherertz;Anusha Belani;Barnett S. Kramer;Gerald J. Elfenbein

  • Prostate Cancer Screening: What We Know and What We Need To Know

    Barnett S. Kramer;Martin L. Brown;Philip C. Prorok;Arnold L. Potosky

  • Baseline Findings of a Randomized Feasibility Trial of Lung Cancer Screening With Spiral CT Scan vs Chest Radiograph: The Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute

    John Gohagan;Pamela Marcus;Richard Fagerstrom;Paul Pinsky

  • Use of Pharmacologic Interventions for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

    Kala Visvanathan;Patricia Hurley;Elissa Bantug;Powel H Brown

  • Final results of the Lung Screening Study, a randomized feasibility study of spiral CT versus chest X-ray screening for lung cancer

    John K. Gohagan;Pamela M. Marcus;Richard M. Fagerstrom;Paul F. Pinsky

  • Race, Treatment, and Long-term Survival From Prostate Cancer in an Equal-Access Medical Care Delivery System

    Scott A. Optenberg;Ian M. Thompson;Paul Friedrichs;Barbara Wojcik

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul F. Pinsky
Paul F. Pinsky National Institutes of Health
Timothy R. Church
Timothy R. Church University of Minnesota
E. David Crawford
E. David Crawford University of California, San Diego
Mark R. Somerfield
Mark R. Somerfield American Society of Clinical Oncology
Adi F. Gazdar
Adi F. Gazdar The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
David Chia
David Chia University of California, Los Angeles
Saundra S. Buys
Saundra S. Buys Huntsman Cancer Institute
Anthony B. Miller
Anthony B. Miller University of Toronto
Gerald L. Andriole
Gerald L. Andriole Washington University in St. Louis
Joel L. Weissfeld
Joel L. Weissfeld University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative and complementary healthcare degrees online can broaden your career options in medicine. For registered nurses looking to advance, bridge programs such as the rn to np bridge program offer a seamless transition from an ADN to a nurse practitioner role—often in less time, with flexible study options.

Healthcare administration is another fast-growing field, and the best programs are those accredited for quality. Choosing a cahme accredited online MHA ensures a curriculum that meets rigorous industry standards and prepares you for high-level management roles in medical settings.

Nutrition is playing an increasing role in preventive medicine. Getting an online nutrition degrees can set you up for jobs ranging from clinical dietetics to wellness consulting, often allowing remote study suited to busy schedules.

If you are progressing as an RN, you may wonder, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Some online RN-to-BSN programs offer paths without in-person clinical requirements, making it easier for working nurses to advance their qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Barnett S. Kramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles