World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 36 8944 8261 431 395 102 6789

Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2005. 5 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2005. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 5
2002 3
2003 5
2004 7
2005 10
2006 8
2007 4
2008 7
2009 5
2010 10
2011 6
2012 6
2013 6
2014 2
2015 6
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
2019 3
2020 1
2021 2
2022 5
2023 3
2024 3
2025 2
Total 118
Download as CSV

Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 102 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 102
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 36
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France and has a distinct research focus within the field of Medicine, particularly in subfields such as Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Physiology, and Genetics.

Their research spans various topics, including:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Pélégrini-Issac has contributed to multiple scientific papers. Notable recent publications include:

  • Prognostic value of global deep white matter DTI metrics for 1-year outcome prediction in ICU traumatic brain injury patients: an MRI-COMA and CENTER-TBI combined study, 2021, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Brain Metabolic Profile in Presymptomatic GRN Carriers Throughout a 5-Year Follow-up, 2022, Neurology
  • Global mean diffusivity: A radiomarker discriminating good outcome long term after traumatic brain injury, 2021, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Comparison of spinal magnetic resonance imaging and classical clinical factors in predicting motor capacity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 2023, Journal of Neurology
  • Quantitative brainstem and spinal MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: implications for predicting noninvasive ventilation needs, 2023, Journal of Neurology

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Intensive Care Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their collaborations feature several frequent co-authors:

  • Louis Puybasset
  • Vincent Perlbarg
  • Muriel Lefort
  • Damien Galanaud
  • Vincent Degos

Best Publications

  • Distinct basal ganglia territories are engaged in early and advanced motor sequence learning

    Stéphane Lehéricy;Habib Benali;Pierre François Van De Moortele;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Support vector machine-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease from whole-brain anatomical MRI

    Benoît Magnin;Lilia Mesrob;Serge Kinkingnéhun;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI.

    Guillaume Marrelec;Alexandre Krainik;Hugues Duffau;Hugues Duffau;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Simulation of anisotropic growth of low-grade gliomas using diffusion tensor imaging.

    Saâd Jbabdi;Emmanuel Mandonnet;Hugues Duffau;Laurent Capelle

  • Brain functional integration decreases during propofol-induced loss of consciousness

    Jessica Schrouff;Vincent Perlbarg;Mélanie Boly;Guillaume Marrelec

  • Diffusion tensor imaging and white matter lesions at the subacute stage in mild traumatic brain injury with persistent neurobehavioral impairment.

    Arnaud Messé;Sophie Caplain;Gaëlle Paradot;Delphine Garrigue

  • CORSICA: correction of structured noise in fMRI by automatic identification of ICA components

    Vincent Perlbarg;Pierre Bellec;Jean-Luc Anton;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in healthy men: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Harold Mouras;Serge Stoléru;Jacques Bittoun;Dominique Glutron

  • Hierarchical clustering of brain activity during human nonrapid eye movement sleep

    Mélanie Boly;Vincent Perlbarg;Guillaume Marrelec;Manuel Schabus

  • Functional immaturity of cortico-basal ganglia networks in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome

    Yulia Worbe;Caroline Malherbe;Andreas Hartmann;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI.

    Pierre Bellec;Vincent Perlbarg;Saâd Jbabdi;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Neuroanatomical correlates of penile erection evoked by photographic stimuli in human males.

    Virginie Moulier;Harold Mouras;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac;Dominique Glutron

  • Specific and Evolving Resting-State Network Alterations in Post-Concussion Syndrome Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    Arnaud Messé;Arnaud Messé;Sophie Caplain;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac;Sophie Blancho

  • Symmetrical event-related EEG/fMRI information fusion in a variational Bayesian framework

    Jean Daunizeau;Christophe Grova;Guillaume Marrelec;Jérémie Mattout

  • Robust Bayesian estimation of the hemodynamic response function in event-related BOLD fMRI using basic physiological information.

    Guillaume Marrelec;Habib Benali;Philippe Ciuciu;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Accurate anisotropic fast marching for diffusion-based geodesic tractography

    S. Jbabdi;P. Bellec;R. Toro;J. Daunizeau

  • Dynamics of motor-related functional integration during motor sequence learning.

    David Coynel;David Coynel;Guillaume Marrelec;Guillaume Marrelec;Vincent Perlbarg;Vincent Perlbarg;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Activation of mirror-neuron system by erotic video clips predicts degree of induced erection: an fMRI study.

    Harold Mouras;Serge Stoléru;V. Moulier;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

  • Multi-Parametric Spinal Cord MRI as Potential Progression Marker in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

    Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili;Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili;Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili;Julien Cohen-Adad;Mélanie Pelegrini-Issac;Mélanie Pelegrini-Issac;Mélanie Pelegrini-Issac;Serge Rossignol

  • Individual differences in prefrontal cortical activation on the Tower of London planning task: implication for effortful processing.

    F. Cazalis;R. Valabrègue;M. Pélégrini-Issac;S. Asloun

  • Structural integrity and postconcussion syndrome in mild traumatic brain injury patients

    Arnaud Messé;Sophie Caplain;Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac;Sophie Blancho

Frequent Co-Authors

Habib Benali
Habib Benali Concordia University
Julien Doyon
Julien Doyon Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Stéphane Lehéricy
Stéphane Lehéricy Sorbonne University
Pierre Bellec
Pierre Bellec University of Montreal
Romain Valabregue
Romain Valabregue Sorbonne University
Jérémie Mattout
Jérémie Mattout Grenoble Alpes University
Jean Daunizeau
Jean Daunizeau Grenoble Alpes University
Christian Barillot
Christian Barillot Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires
Michel Dojat
Michel Dojat French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Eric Bardinet
Eric Bardinet Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When pursuing a career in neuroscience, it’s valuable to explore related fields through online education. Several online programs offer flexibility and specialization, making it easier to complement a neuroscience background or transition into related career pathways.

For those interested in social work, 1 year msw programs provide a fast track toward advanced licensure and clinical careers. Similarly, students who are looking for a broader understanding of human behavior should review the list of colleges with accelerated psychology programs.

Mental health counseling is another closely related area. Choosing cacrep accredited programs online ensures high standards and prepares students for licensure as professional counselors. For cost-conscious learners, there are also online mental health degree programs that make specialized training more accessible.

These pathways can expand your expertise beyond neuroscience and open doors to roles in research, clinical settings, and community outreach—all through fully online, accredited options.

Best Scientists Citing Mélanie Pélégrini-Issac

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles