World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
10612
World Ranking
4978
National Ranking
160

Lluís Coll publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lluís Coll sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lluís Coll D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lluís Coll sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lluís Coll is affiliated with the University of Lleida in Spain and has a research focus primarily in Environmental Science. Their work extensively explores Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, and Insect Science, with notable publication counts in each subfield.

The research of Lluís Coll centers around several main topics, including Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Forest Ecology and Management, Tree-ring Climate Responses, Fire Effects on Ecosystems, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Forest Management and Policy, and Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies.

They have published numerous papers, some of the recent ones include:

  • Species mixing reduces drought susceptibility of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) - Site water supply and fertility modify the mixing effect, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios, 2020, Ecosystem Services
  • Unravelling the effect of species mixing on water use and drought stress in Mediterranean forests: A modelling approach, 2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Ecosystem services provision by Mediterranean forests will be compromised above 2℃ warming, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Forest expansion in mountain protected areas: Trends and consequences for the landscape, 2021, Landscape and Urban Planning

Frequent co-authors in their work include Aitor Améztegui, Kamil Bielak, Miren del Río, Maciej Pach, and Hans Pretzsch.

The scholar has often published in venues such as Forest Ecology and Management, SSRN Electronic Journal, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, The Science of The Total Environment, and Canadian Journal of Forest Research.

Additionally, Lluís Coll has contributed to book publications through the European Organization for Nuclear Research, with titles like "Gestión adaptativa y naturalística en bosques mixtos mediterráneos sub-húmedos: encinares, castañares, robledales y pinares" and "Gestió adaptativa i naturalística en boscos mixtos mediterranis subhumits: alzinars, castanyedes, rouredes i pinedes," both published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future

    Rob W. Brooker;Fernando T. Maestre;Ragan M. Callaway;Christopher L. Lortie

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Unraveling the Effects of Plant Hydraulics on Stomatal Closure during Water Stress in Walnut

    Hervé Cochard;Lluis Coll;Xavier Le Roux;Thierry Améglio

  • Growth and yield of mixed versus pure stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe

    H. Pretzsch;M. del Río;Ch. Ammer;A. Avdagic

  • Land‐use changes as major drivers of mountain pine (Pinus uncinata Ram.) expansion in the Pyrenees

    Aitor Améztegui;Lluís Brotons;Lluís Coll

  • Hydraulic architecture of leaf blades: where is the main resistance?

    Hervé Cochard;A. Nardini;L. Coll

  • Viewing forests through the lens of complex systems science

    Elise Filotas;Lael Parrott;Philip J. Burton;Robin L. Chazdon

  • Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe

    David Ian Forrester;David Ian Forrester;Christian Ammer;Peter J. Annighöfer;Ignacio Barbeito

  • Species interactions increase the temporal stability of community productivity in Pinus sylvestris-Fagus sylvatica mixtures across Europe

    Miren del Río;Miren del Río;Hans Pretzsch;Ricardo Ruíz-Peinado;Ricardo Ruíz-Peinado;Evy Ampoorter

  • BAAD: a Biomass And Allometry Database for woody plants

    Daniel S. Falster;Remko A. Duursma;Masae I. Ishihara;Diego R. Barneche

  • Land-use legacies rather than climate change are driving the recent upward shift of the mountain tree line in the Pyrenees

    Aitor Ameztegui;Lluís Coll;Lluís Brotons;Lluís Brotons;Josep M. Ninot

  • European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives

    Andres Bravo-Oviedo;Hans Pretzsch;Christian Ammer;Ernesto Andenmatten

  • Mixing of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) enhances structural heterogeneity, and the effect increases with water availability

    H. Pretzsch;M. del Río;G. Schütze;Ch. Ammer

  • Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition

    Thomas Curt;Lluis Coll;Bernard Prévosto;Philippe Balandier

  • Competition for water between beech seedlings and surrounding vegetation in different light and vegetation composition conditions

    Lluis Coll;Philippe Balandier;Catherine Picon-Cochard;Bernard Prévosto

  • Knowledge gaps about mixed forests: What do European forest managers want to know and what answers can science provide?

    Lluís Coll;Lluís Coll;Aitor Ameztegui;Catherine Collet;Magnus Löf

  • Species mixing reduces drought susceptibility of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) – Site water supply and fertility modify the mixing effect

    M. Steckel;M. del Río;M. del Río;M. Heym;J. Aldea

  • Forest management for adaptation to climate change in the Mediterranean basin: A synthesis of evidence

    Albert Vilà-Cabrera;Lluis Coll;Jordi Martinez-Vilalta;Javier Retana

  • Trajectory analysis in community ecology

    Miquel De Cáceres;Lluís Coll;Pierre Legendre;Robert B. Allen

  • Future trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services in Mediterranean forests under global change scenarios

    Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez;Aitor Ameztegui;Miquel De Cáceres;Sergio de-Miguel

  • Coupling a water balance model with forest inventory data to predict drought stress : the role of forest structural changes vs. climate changes

    Miquel De Cáceres;Jordi Martínez-Vilalta;Lluís Coll;Pilar Llorens

  • Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced belowground competition

    Lluis Coll;Philippe Balandier;Catherine Picon-Cochard

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Pretzsch
Hans Pretzsch Technical University of Munich
Andrés Bravo-Oviedo
Andrés Bravo-Oviedo Spanish National Research Council
Magnus Löf
Magnus Löf Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Tzvetan Zlatanov
Tzvetan Zlatanov Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research
Christian Messier
Christian Messier University of Quebec at Montreal
Quentin Ponette
Quentin Ponette Université Catholique de Louvain
Miren del Río
Miren del Río University of Valladolid
Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado
Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado Spanish National Research Council
David I. Forrester
David I. Forrester Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Hubert Sterba
Hubert Sterba BOKU University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Ecology and Evolution, you may also want to explore allied health and science career options. Many students consider nursing and advanced practice roles due to high demand and flexible education pathways.

For instance, understanding the dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state can help you evaluate earning potential if you’re aiming for a healthcare career with strong job prospects. There are also streamlined routes to advance your education quickly, so you can make a difference as soon as possible.

If you’re wondering how long does it take to become a nurse practitioner, the answer depends on your starting point and chosen program type. For registered nurses looking to upgrade their credentials efficiently, some rn to bsn 6 months programs allow you to earn a bachelor's degree in less than a year.

Additionally, specialized rn to np bridge programs create a smooth transition from an associate degree in nursing straight to a master’s or nurse practitioner qualification. These options make it easier to pursue careers at the intersection of science, healthcare, and public impact.

Best Scientists Citing Lluís Coll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles