World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
6123
World Ranking
5620
National Ranking
135

Magnus Löf publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magnus Löf sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 135 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Magnus Löf D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Magnus Löf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Magnus Löf is affiliated with the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in Sweden. Their research spans the broad fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on forest ecology and management.

The scientist's work covers multiple subfields, including:

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Insect Science
  • Plant Science
  • Atmospheric Science

Key topics in Magnus Löf's research include:

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies

Magnus Löf has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • European Journal of Forest Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Magnus Löf have included:

  • Miren del Río
  • Kamil Bielak
  • Hans Pretzsch
  • Michael Heym
  • Gediminas Brazaitis

Selected recent publications by Magnus Löf include:

  • "Precision restoration: a necessary approach to foster forest recovery in the 21st century," 2021, Restoration Ecology
  • "Emerging stability of forest productivity by mixing two species buffers temperature destabilizing effect," 2022, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • "Timing and duration of drought modulate tree growth response in pure and mixed stands of Scots pine and Norway spruce," 2022, Journal of Ecology
  • "Tree species identity drives soil organic carbon storage more than species mixing in major two-species mixtures (pine, oak, beech) in Europe," 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Mixing effects on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) productivity along a climatic gradient across Europe," 2020, Forest Ecology and Management

Best Publications

  • Adaptive forest management in central Europe: Climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept

    Andreas Bolte;Christian Ammer;Magnus Löf;Palle Madsen

  • Growth and yield of mixed versus pure stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe

    H. Pretzsch;M. del Río;Ch. Ammer;A. Avdagic

  • Mechanical site preparation for forest restoration

    Magnus Löf;Daniel C. Dey;Rafael M. Navarro;Douglass F. Jacobs

  • Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe

    David Ian Forrester;David Ian Forrester;Christian Ammer;Peter J. Annighöfer;Ignacio Barbeito

  • Species interactions increase the temporal stability of community productivity in Pinus sylvestris-Fagus sylvatica mixtures across Europe

    Miren del Río;Miren del Río;Hans Pretzsch;Ricardo Ruíz-Peinado;Ricardo Ruíz-Peinado;Evy Ampoorter

  • European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives

    Andres Bravo-Oviedo;Hans Pretzsch;Christian Ammer;Ernesto Andenmatten

  • Restoring forests: regeneration and ecosystem function for the future

    Magnus Löf;Palle Madsen;Marek Metslaid;Johanna Witzell

  • Mixing of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) enhances structural heterogeneity, and the effect increases with water availability

    H. Pretzsch;M. del Río;G. Schütze;Ch. Ammer

  • A review of thinning effects on Scots pine stands: From growth and yield to new challenges under global change

    Miren del Río;Andrés Bravo-Oviedo;Hans Pretzsch;Magnus Löf

  • Knowledge gaps about mixed forests: What do European forest managers want to know and what answers can science provide?

    Lluís Coll;Lluís Coll;Aitor Ameztegui;Catherine Collet;Magnus Löf

  • Establishment and growth in seedlings of Fagus sylvatica and Quercus robur : influence of interference from herbaceous vegetation

    M. Löf

  • Terrestrial laser scanning reveals differences in crown structure of Fagus sylvatica in mixed vs. pure European forests

    Ignacio Barbeito;Mathieu Dassot;Dominik Bayer;Catherine Collet

  • Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe

    H. Pretzsch;M. Steckel;M. Heym;P. Biber

  • Shrubs protect oak seedlings against ungulate browsing in temperate broadleaved forests of conservation interest: A field experiment

    Anna M. Jensen;Frank Götmark;Magnus Löf

  • Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic and Baltic countries - a review on current and future opportunities.

    Lars Rytter;Morten Ingerslev;Antti Kilpeläinen;Piritta Torssonen

  • Reforestation in southern Scandinavia using direct seeding of oak (Quercus robur L.)

    Palle Madsen;Magnus Löf

  • Precision restoration: A necessary approach to foster forest recovery in the 21st century

    Jorge Castro;Fernando Morales-Rueda;Francisco B. Navarro;Magnus Löf

  • Root system development of oak seedlings analysed using an architectural model. Effects of competition with grass

    Catherine Collet;Magnus Löf;Loïc Pagès

  • Management of oak forests: striking a balance between timber production, biodiversity and cultural services

    Magnus Löf;Jörg Brunet;Anna Filyushkina;Matts Lindbladh

  • Species-specific and generic biomass equations for seedlings and saplings of European tree species

    Peter Annighöfer;Aitor Ameztegui;Christian Ammer;Philippe Balandier

  • Germination and early growth of sown Quercus robur L. in relation to soil preparation, sowing depths and prevention against predation

    Urban Nilsson;Pelle Gemmel;Magnus Löf;Torkel Welander

  • Effects of roe deer browsing and site preparation on performance of planted broadleaved and conifer seedlings when using temporary fences.

    Jonas Bergquist;Magnus Löf;Göran Örlander

  • Influence of herbaceous competitors on early growth in direct seeded Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus robur L.

    Magnus Löf;Nils Torkel Welander

  • European Mixed Forests

    Andres Bravo-Oviedo;Magnus Löf;Jens Peter Skovsgaard;Tzvetan Zlatanov

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Pretzsch
Hans Pretzsch Technical University of Munich
Andrés Bravo-Oviedo
Andrés Bravo-Oviedo Spanish National Research Council
Lluís Coll
Lluís Coll University of Lleida
Miren del Río
Miren del Río University of Valladolid
Quentin Ponette
Quentin Ponette Université Catholique de Louvain
Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado
Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado Spanish National Research Council
Tzvetan Zlatanov
Tzvetan Zlatanov Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research
Christian Ammer
Christian Ammer University of Göttingen
David I. Forrester
David I. Forrester Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Felipe Bravo
Felipe Bravo University of Valladolid

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often sparks interest in careers supporting people and communities, from counseling to public health. If you’re considering a shift or want to expand your skill set, there are a wide range of online degrees that can enhance your knowledge and open up new career paths.

For those passionate about helping others, affordable masters in counseling programs enable working professionals to earn a graduate degree at a reasonable cost. Similarly, online clinical psychology programs provide flexibility and specialized training for roles that bridge science, health, and human behavior.

If you want to make an impact through community organizations, human services online degree programs are available in accelerated formats. These degrees prepare you for careers supporting diverse populations.

For educators seeking a new direction, it’s also possible to transition from teaching to allied health roles—learn more about the journey from teacher to speech language pathologist and the steps involved in making this meaningful career change.

Best Scientists Citing Magnus Löf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles