World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
27059
World Ranking
1412
National Ranking
668

Ned Kock publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ned Kock sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 235 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ned Kock D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ned Kock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ned Kock is affiliated with Texas A&M International University in the United States. Their research spans several academic fields, with a focus on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, and Information Systems and Management. The scope of their work covers a diverse range of topics including Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, Knowledge Management and Sharing, Economic Growth and Development, Big Data and Business Intelligence, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications, and International Business and Foreign Direct Investment.

They have authored several recent papers across various peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Notable publications include:

  • "Technology, innovation and SMEs' export intensity: Evidence from Morocco" (2023) in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • "The catalyzing role of customer pressure on environmental initiatives and export intensity: A study of family firms" (2023) in Journal of Business Research
  • "Contributing to the Success of PLS in SEM: An Action Research Perspective" (2023) in Communications of the Association for Information Systems
  • "Moderated mediation and J-curve emergence in path models: an information systems research perspective" (2021) in Journal of Systems and Information Technology
  • "Will PLS have to become factor-based to survive and thrive?" (2024) in European Journal of Information Systems

They frequently collaborate with several scholars including Augustine Tarkom, Mohamed Yacine Haddoud, Adah-Kole Emmanuel Onjewu, Prash Gopal, and Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications, reflecting a network of research partnerships.

Research dissemination primarily occurs through certain academic venues where several of their studies have appeared. These include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  • Journal of Systems and Information Technology
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Best Publications

  • Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach

    Ned Kock

  • Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations

    Ned Kock;Gary S. Lynn

  • Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods

    Ned Kock;Pierre Hadaya

  • Principles of canonical action research

    Robert M. Davison;Maris G. Martinsons;Ned Kock

  • A Note on How to Conduct a Factor-Based PLS-SEM Analysis

    Ned Kock

  • The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution

    Ned Kock

  • Advanced Mediating Effects Tests, Multi-Group Analyses, and Measurement Model Assessments in PLS-Based SEM

    Ned Kock

  • Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools

    N. Kock

  • Common Method Bias: A Full Collinearity Assessment Method for PLS-SEM

    Ned Kock

  • A revised framework of social exchange theory to investigate the factors influencing residents' perceptions

    S. Mostafa Rasoolimanesh;Mastura Jaafar;Ned Kock;T. Ramayah

  • Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective

    Darleen M. DeRosa;Donald A. Hantula;Ned Kock;John D'Arcy

  • Using WarpPLS in E-collaboration Studies: An Overview of Five Main Analysis Steps

    Ned Kock

  • Organizational members’ use of social networking sites and job performance

    Murad A. Moqbel;Saggi Nevo;Ned Kock

  • Unveiling the dark side of social networking sites: Personal and work-related consequences of social networking site addiction

    Murad A. Moqbel;Ned Kock

  • Using WarpPLS in e-Collaboration Studies: Mediating Effects, Control and Second Order Variables, and Algorithm Choices

    Ned Kock

  • Pain and Pleasure in Short Essay Writing: Factors Predicting University Students' Writing Anxiety and Writing Self‐Efficacy

    Christy Teranishi Martinez;Ned Kock;Jeffrey Cass

  • Using WarpPLS in e-Collaboration Studies: Descriptive Statistics, Settings, and Key Analysis Results

    Ned Kock

  • The three threats of action research: a discussion of methodological antidotes in the context of an information systems study

    Ned Kock

  • One-Tailed or Two-Tailed P Values in PLS-SEM?

    Ned Kock

  • The effects of community factors on residents’ perceptions toward World Heritage Site inscription and sustainable tourism development

    S. Mostafa Rasoolimanesh;Mastura Jaafar;Ned Kock;A. Ghafar Ahmad

  • Encyclopedia of E-collaboration

    Ned Kock

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter M. Todd
Peter M. Todd Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens diverse career pathways, especially with the growing availability of flexible online degrees. Many students interested in psychology or counseling look into the best psyd programs to gain advanced clinical skills and become licensed psychologists. Another popular route is pursuing an MFT degree. The online masters mft programs offer training to become a marriage and family therapist, often with convenient and accelerated options.

For those looking for cost-effective options, getting a masters in psychology online can be a smart move. These programs cater to various specializations and budgets, making them accessible for many students. In addition, professionals aiming to work in education or organizational leadership can explore edd programs for advanced roles.

With online education, students have flexibility and a wide range of accredited pathways, making it easier to advance their careers or switch into new roles in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ned Kock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles