World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 35 6579 6119 3184 2908 76 11775

Dean B. McFarlin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dean B. McFarlin between 1981 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dean B. McFarlin published across 37 years, from 1981 to 2017, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2014. 9 of the 76 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2014. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 9 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 9 publications
1981 2017

76 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dean B. McFarlin: publications per year, 1981 to 2017
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 4
1985 4
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 4
1990 5
1991 6
1992 4
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 0
2010 1
2011 1
2012 1
2013 1
2014 9
2015 0
2016 0
2017 9
Total 76
Download as CSV

Dean B. McFarlin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean B. McFarlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 76 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 76
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Dean B. McFarlin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean B. McFarlin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243 35
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Dean B. McFarlin is affiliated with Duquesne University in the United States. Their academic profile indicates active involvement in research and teaching within this institution.

While specific recent publications and citation details are not available, McFarlin's presence in the academic community is established through this affiliation. There are no listed co-authors or frequent publication venues associated with their work, suggesting that their research output may be either individually authored or not extensively recorded in commonly indexed sources.

Information about fields of study, subfields, and main research topics related to McFarlin's work is not provided. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards attributed to them.

This profile reflects the available data solely and does not speculate beyond the documented facts.

Best Publications

  • Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes

    Dean B. McFarlin;Paul D. Sweeney

  • Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice.

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships☆

    Belle Rose Ragins;Dean B McFarlin

  • Work—nonwork conflict and the perceived quality of life

    Robert W. Rice;Michael R. Frone;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Process and outcome: gender differences in the assessment of justice

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFARLIN

  • Effects of self-esteem and performance feedback on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations.

    Dean B. McFarlin;Jim Blascovich

  • Overworked and Underpaid: On the Nature of Gender Differences in Personal Entitlement

    Brenda Major;Dean B. McFarlin;Diana Gagnon

  • Facet importance and job satisfaction.

    Robert W. Rice;Douglas A. Gentile;Dean B. McFarlin

  • On knowing when to quit: Task failure, self‐esteem, advice, and nonproductive persistence

    Dean B. McFarlin;Roy F. Baumeister;Jim Blascovich

  • Organizational Work and the Perceived Quality of Life: Toward a Conceptual Model

    Robert W. Rice;Dean B. McFarlin;Raymond G. Hunt;Janet P. Near

  • Standards of comparison and job satisfaction.

    Robert W. Rice;Dean B. McFarlin;Debbie E. Bennett

  • Research Notes: Using Relative Deprivation Theory to Explain Satisfaction With Income and Pay Level: A Multistudy Examination

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin;Edward J. Inderrieden

  • Organizational Behavior: Solutions for Management

    Paul B. Sweeney;Dean B McFarlin

  • Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction.

    Robert W. Rice;Suzanne M. Phillips;Dean B. McFarlin

  • On the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as an Alternative to Illusory Performance Feedback: A Methodological Note

    Dean B. McFarlin;Jim Blascovich

  • Integrating the disabled into the work force: A survey of fortune 500 company attitudes and practices

    Dean B. McFarlin;James Song;Michelle Sonntag

  • The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction processes

    Dean B. McFarlin;Robert W. Rice

  • International Management: Strategic Opportunities and Cultural Challenges

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Wage comparisons with similar and dissimilar others

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Does Having a Say Matter Only if You Get Your Way? INstrumental and Value-Expressive Effects of Employee Voice

    Dean B. McFarlin;Paul D. Sweeney

  • Motivation and the self-system.

    Joel O. Raynor;Dean B. McFarlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Frone
Michael R. Frone University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Brenda Major
Brenda Major University of California, Santa Barbara
Jim Blascovich
Jim Blascovich University of California, Santa Barbara
Belle Rose Ragins
Belle Rose Ragins University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Maria Testa
Maria Testa University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Janet P. Near
Janet P. Near University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
Sid L. Huff
Sid L. Huff University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Social Sciences and Humanities is now more accessible than ever, thanks to a growing array of online study options in the USA. Whether you are drawn to psychology, counseling, education, or marriage and family therapy, flexible programs allow you to earn degrees while balancing work or family commitments.

Some students pursue advanced clinical expertise through an online psyd program to become licensed psychologists. Others look for accelerated pathways like the shortest edd program online to quickly move into leadership roles in education.

For those interested in therapy and counseling, online mft programs prepare graduates for rewarding work with couples and families. Meanwhile, if affordability is a priority, an online masters psychology degree offers a cost-effective route into research, counseling, or organizational roles.

By choosing the right online program, you can tailor your studies to fit your goals, timeline, and budget—opening up diverse career pathways in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Dean B. McFarlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles