World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
11775
World Ranking
6579
National Ranking
3184

Dean B. McFarlin publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean B. McFarlin sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 76 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Dean B. McFarlin D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean B. McFarlin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dean B. McFarlin is affiliated with Duquesne University in the United States. Their academic profile indicates active involvement in research and teaching within this institution.

While specific recent publications and citation details are not available, McFarlin's presence in the academic community is established through this affiliation. There are no listed co-authors or frequent publication venues associated with their work, suggesting that their research output may be either individually authored or not extensively recorded in commonly indexed sources.

Information about fields of study, subfields, and main research topics related to McFarlin's work is not provided. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or awards attributed to them.

This profile reflects the available data solely and does not speculate beyond the documented facts.

Best Publications

  • Research Notes. Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes

    Dean B. McFarlin;Paul D. Sweeney

  • Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice.

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships☆

    Belle Rose Ragins;Dean B McFarlin

  • Work—nonwork conflict and the perceived quality of life

    Robert W. Rice;Michael R. Frone;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Process and outcome: gender differences in the assessment of justice

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFARLIN

  • Effects of self-esteem and performance feedback on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations.

    Dean B. McFarlin;Jim Blascovich

  • Overworked and Underpaid: On the Nature of Gender Differences in Personal Entitlement

    Brenda Major;Dean B. McFarlin;Diana Gagnon

  • Facet importance and job satisfaction.

    Robert W. Rice;Douglas A. Gentile;Dean B. McFarlin

  • On knowing when to quit: Task failure, self‐esteem, advice, and nonproductive persistence

    Dean B. McFarlin;Roy F. Baumeister;Jim Blascovich

  • Organizational Work and the Perceived Quality of Life: Toward a Conceptual Model

    Robert W. Rice;Dean B. McFarlin;Raymond G. Hunt;Janet P. Near

  • Standards of comparison and job satisfaction.

    Robert W. Rice;Dean B. McFarlin;Debbie E. Bennett

  • Research Notes: Using Relative Deprivation Theory to Explain Satisfaction With Income and Pay Level: A Multistudy Examination

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin;Edward J. Inderrieden

  • Organizational Behavior: Solutions for Management

    Paul B. Sweeney;Dean B McFarlin

  • Multiple discrepancies and pay satisfaction.

    Robert W. Rice;Suzanne M. Phillips;Dean B. McFarlin

  • On the Remote Associates Test (RAT) as an Alternative to Illusory Performance Feedback: A Methodological Note

    Dean B. McFarlin;Jim Blascovich

  • Integrating the disabled into the work force: A survey of fortune 500 company attitudes and practices

    Dean B. McFarlin;James Song;Michelle Sonntag

  • The role of facet importance as a moderator in job satisfaction processes

    Dean B. McFarlin;Robert W. Rice

  • International Management: Strategic Opportunities and Cultural Challenges

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Wage comparisons with similar and dissimilar others

    Paul D. Sweeney;Dean B. McFarlin

  • Does Having a Say Matter Only if You Get Your Way? INstrumental and Value-Expressive Effects of Employee Voice

    Dean B. McFarlin;Paul D. Sweeney

  • Motivation and the self-system.

    Joel O. Raynor;Dean B. McFarlin

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Frone
Michael R. Frone University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Brenda Major
Brenda Major University of California, Santa Barbara
Jim Blascovich
Jim Blascovich University of California, Santa Barbara
Belle Rose Ragins
Belle Rose Ragins University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Maria Testa
Maria Testa University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Janet P. Near
Janet P. Near University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University
Sid L. Huff
Sid L. Huff University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Social Sciences and Humanities is now more accessible than ever, thanks to a growing array of online study options in the USA. Whether you are drawn to psychology, counseling, education, or marriage and family therapy, flexible programs allow you to earn degrees while balancing work or family commitments.

Some students pursue advanced clinical expertise through an online psyd program to become licensed psychologists. Others look for accelerated pathways like the shortest edd program online to quickly move into leadership roles in education.

For those interested in therapy and counseling, online mft programs prepare graduates for rewarding work with couples and families. Meanwhile, if affordability is a priority, an online masters psychology degree offers a cost-effective route into research, counseling, or organizational roles.

By choosing the right online program, you can tailor your studies to fit your goals, timeline, and budget—opening up diverse career pathways in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Dean B. McFarlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles