World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicolas M. Van Mieghem

Nicolas M. Van Mieghem

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
41860
World Ranking
14379
National Ranking
550

Nicolas M. Van Mieghem publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas M. Van Mieghem sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 641 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicolas M. Van Mieghem D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas M. Van Mieghem sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicolas M. Van Mieghem is affiliated with Erasmus MC in the Netherlands. Their research output is primarily in the field of Medicine, with a specific focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The main topics of Van Mieghem's work encompass:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches

Van Mieghem has published extensively in highly specialized cardiology journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (81 publications)
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions (66 publications)
  • EuroIntervention (34 publications)
  • Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (33 publications)
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (32 publications)

Van Mieghem has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, notably:

  • Roberto Diletti (115 joint publications)
  • Joost Daemen (110 joint publications)
  • Isabella Kardys (96 joint publications)
  • Wijnand K. den Dekker (91 joint publications)
  • Felix Zijlstra (78 joint publications)

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Van Mieghem include:

  • 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death, published in 2022 in the European Heart Journal
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research, published in 2021 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research, published in 2020 in the European Heart Journal
  • Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction, published in 2020 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis, published in 2023 in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology

The scope of Van Mieghem's work spans clinical research, outcome studies, and intervention developments primarily within cardiovascular medicine and cardiac valve disease management.

Best Publications

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

    M. J. Reardon;N. M. Van Mieghem;J. J. Popma;N. S. Kleiman

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Aortic stenosis in the elderly: Disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis and modeling study

    Ruben L.J. Osnabrugge;Darren Mylotte;Darren Mylotte;Stuart J. Head;Nicolas M. Van Mieghem

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.

    Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza;Maria C. Alu

  • Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using valve Academic Research Consortium definitions: A weighted meta-analysis of 3,519 patients from 16 studies

    Philippe Généreux;Stuart J. Head;Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Susheel Kodali

  • Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Achilles' Heel? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

    Philippe Généreux;Stuart J. Head;Rebecca Hahn;Benoit Daneault

  • Timing, Predictive Factors, and Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Events in a Large Cohort of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Luis Nombela-Franco;John G. Webb;Peter P. de Jaegere;Stefan Toggweiler

  • Feasibility of Shockwave Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Stenoses.

    Todd J. Brinton;Ziad A. Ali;Jonathan M. Hill;Ian T. Meredith

  • Incidence, Predictors, and Implications of Access Site Complications With Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Didier Tchetche;Alaide Chieffo;Nicolas Dumonteil

  • Histopathology of Embolic Debris Captured During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

    Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Marguerite E.I. Schipper;Elena Ladich;Elham Faqiri

  • Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study.

    Javier Escaned;Carlos Collet;Nicola Ryan;Giovanni Luigi De Maria

  • A 3-Center Comparison of 1-Year Mortality Outcomes Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on the Basis of Propensity Score Matching Among Intermediate-Risk Surgical Patients

    Nicolo Piazza;Bindu Kalesan;Nicolas van Mieghem;Stuart Head

  • Annual number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation per country: current estimates and future projections

    Andras P Durko;Ruben L Osnabrugge;Nicolas M Van Mieghem;Milan Milojevic

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Pure Native Aortic Valve Regurgitation

    Sung Han Yoon;Tobias Schmidt;Sabine Bleiziffer;Niklas Schofer

  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN versus the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving system devices: a multicenter collaborative study: the PRAGMATIC Plus Initiative (Pooled-RotterdAm-Milano-Toulouse In Collaboration).

    Alaide Chieffo;Gill Louise Buchanan;Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Didier Tchetche

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Europe Adoption Trends and Factors Influencing Device Utilization

    Darren Mylotte;Ruben L.J. Osnabrugge;Stephan Windecker;Thierry Lefèvre

  • Optical Coherence Tomography Characterization of Coronary Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Lesions: First Description

    Ziad A. Ali;Todd J. Brinton;Jonathan M. Hill;Akiko Maehara

  • Reduced Leaflet Motion after Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement

    Ole De Backer;George D. Dangas;Hasan Jilaihawi;Jonathon A. Leipsic

  • Incidence and Predictors of Debris Embolizing to the Brain During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Nahid El Faquir;Zouhair Rahhab;Ramón Rodríguez-Olivares

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Nicolo Piazza
Nicolo Piazza McGill University Health Centre
Lars Søndergaard
Lars Søndergaard Abbott (United States)
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau Université Laval
David Hildick-Smith
David Hildick-Smith University of Sussex
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
Marco Barbanti
Marco Barbanti Kore University of Enna
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Medicine is only one of many rewarding career pathways in U.S. healthcare. For those looking for alternative options, especially online, there are several in-demand fields to consider. Some students prioritize flexibility or the quickest route to entering the workforce. If you’re interested in nursing, explore the easiest nursing schools to get into for a smoother admissions process.

Many also look for pathways that don’t require rigorous entrance exams. Check out a nursing school that doesn't require teas or HESI exams, allowing you to start your journey sooner. If administration or back-office roles appeal to you, earning a healthcare administration degree online accredited can offer high growth potential and leadership opportunities.

Prefer working with healthcare data? Discover the best online medical billing and coding schools for programs you can start from home, many with financial aid options. Each path offers its own unique advantages, letting you make a difference in healthcare regardless of your chosen role.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas M. Van Mieghem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles