World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 16866 15860 706 669 350 46697

Nicolo Piazza publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicolo Piazza between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicolo Piazza published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 17.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2016. 23 of the 407 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2016. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 10 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 2 publications
2004 2026

407 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicolo Piazza: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 10
2009 19
2010 19
2011 24
2012 24
2013 27
2014 30
2015 30
2016 36
2017 21
2018 23
2019 22
2020 21
2021 16
2022 15
2023 27
2024 17
2025 21
2026 2
Total 407
Download as CSV

Nicolo Piazza publications per year - data summary

  • Nicolo Piazza, a Medicine scholar from McGill University Health Centre, has 407 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 36 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2004, 2005 and 2007, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 23 years in the span carries no publications at all (2006).
  • The rate of publication averages 17.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 18.5 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 82 publications, 20% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 75 publications (9.4 per year); 2012-2019: 213 publications (26.6 per year); 2020-2026: 119 publications (17.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Nicolo Piazza publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolo Piazza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 350 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 350
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicolo Piazza publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Nicolo Piazza, a Medicine scholar from McGill University Health Centre, records 350 publications - the 28th percentile of the discipline.
  • 28% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Nicolo Piazza, and about 72% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Nicolo Piazza ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Nicolo Piazza D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolo Piazza sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Nicolo Piazza D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Nicolo Piazza, a Medicine scholar from McGill University Health Centre, records 80 D-Index - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Nicolo Piazza, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Nicolo Piazza ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Nicolo Piazza is affiliated with the McGill University Health Centre in Canada and has an extensive research portfolio in the field of Medicine, with a primary focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly contributions span several subfields including Epidemiology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The topics covered in their research include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Nicolo Piazza has coauthored several papers alongside frequent collaborators such as Giuseppe Martucci, Marco Spaziano, Didier Tchétché, Nicolas M. Van Mieghem, and John G. Webb.

The venues where Nicolo Piazza has published most frequently include:

  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology
  • EuroIntervention
  • European Heart Journal

Recent papers featuring Nicolo Piazza include:

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research, 2020, European Heart Journal
  • Repeat Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Transcatheter Prosthesis Dysfunction, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Chimney Stenting for Coronary Occlusion During TAVR, 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis, 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients

    Jeffrey J Popma;G Michael Deeb;Steven J Yakubov;Mubashir Mumtaz

  • Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients

    M. J. Reardon;N. M. Van Mieghem;J. J. Popma;N. S. Kleiman

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials : A Consensus Report From the Valve Academic Research Consortium

    Martin B Leon;Nicolo Piazza;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Aortic stenosis in the elderly: Disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis and modeling study

    Ruben L.J. Osnabrugge;Darren Mylotte;Darren Mylotte;Stuart J. Head;Nicolas M. Van Mieghem

  • Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials

    Martin B. Leon;Nicolo Piazza;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Procedural and 30-day outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the third generation (18 Fr) CoreValve ReValving System: results from the multicentre, expanded evaluation registry 1-year following CE mark approval

    Nicolo Piazza;Eberhard Grube;Ulrich Gerckens;Peter den Heijer

  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.

    Danny Dvir;John G. Webb;Sabine Bleiziffer;Miralem Pasic

  • Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve

    Nicoló Piazza;Peter de Jaegere;Carl Schultz;Anton E. Becker

  • Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study

    Jonathan Afilalo;Sandra Lauck;Dae H. Kim;Thierry Lefèvre

  • Clinical Trial Design Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: Part 2: Endpoint Definitions: A Consensus Document From the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium.

    Gregg W. Stone;David H. Adams;William T. Abraham;Arie Pieter Kappetein

  • Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)

    Davide Capodanno;Anna S. Petronio;Bernard D. Prendergast;Helene Eltchaninoff

  • Early and persistent intraventricular conduction abnormalities and requirements for pacemaking after percutaneous replacement of the aortic valve.

    Nicolo Piazza;Yoshinobu Onuma;Emile Jesserun;Peter Paul Kint

  • TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT IN BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE DISEASE

    Darren Mylotte;Thierry Lefevre;Lars Søndergaard;Yusuke Watanabe

  • 1-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification

    Mayra Guerrero;Marina Urena;Dominique Himbert;Dee Dee Wang

  • Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Native Mitral Valve Disease With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification Results From the First Multicenter Global Registry

    Mayra Guerrero;Danny Dvir;Dominique Himbert;Marina Urena

  • A 3-Center Comparison of 1-Year Mortality Outcomes Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement on the Basis of Propensity Score Matching Among Intermediate-Risk Surgical Patients

    Nicolo Piazza;Bindu Kalesan;Nicolas van Mieghem;Stuart Head

  • Guidelines on the Management of Valvular Heart disease (Version 2012)

    Alec Vahanian;Ottavio Alfieri;Felicita Andreotti;Manuel J. Antunes

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Stephan Windecker
Stephan Windecker University of Bern
John G. Webb
John G. Webb University of British Columbia
Jonathon Leipsic
Jonathon Leipsic University of British Columbia
Corrado Tamburino
Corrado Tamburino University of Catania
Peter de Jaegere
Peter de Jaegere Erasmus University Rotterdam
Philipp Blanke
Philipp Blanke University of British Columbia
Lars Søndergaard
Lars Søndergaard Abbott (United States)
Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to practicing medicine in the USA can follow various routes, and online education makes it even more accessible. For those aspiring to leadership roles in nursing, pursuing one of the cheapest DNP programs online offers a flexible and affordable way to advance your nursing career.

Future pharmacists can consider online pharmacist programs, which provide rigorous academic training with the convenience of distance learning.

If you are interested in healthcare administration, an HIM bachelor's degree online is a popular option. This degree prepares graduates for roles managing patient data, electronic health records, and healthcare compliance.

For those seeking a quick entry into the medical field, certification in billing and coding can lead to rewarding work. Understanding medical coding certification cost is crucial before enrolling, as affordability varies between programs.

These diverse educational pathways show that careers in healthcare are not limited to traditional MD degrees. Online programs can provide practical and flexible opportunities for advancement, both in clinical and administrative fields.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolo Piazza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles