World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
9395
World Ranking
7098
National Ranking
595

Frank Bremmer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Bremmer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 177 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frank Bremmer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Bremmer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Bremmer is affiliated with Philipp University of Marburg in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. The breadth of their work includes neurology, computer vision and pattern recognition, physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation, and human-computer interaction.

The main topics within Frank Bremmer's research encompass:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Parkinson's Disease mechanisms and treatments
  • Balance, gait, and falls prevention
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Motor control and adaptation
  • Memory and neural mechanisms

Bremmer's frequent co-authors include Jakob C. B. Schwenk, Adrian Schütz, David Engel, Lars Timmermann, and Josefine Waldthaler. Their collaborative work reflects various aspects of brain function and perception studies.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues. The most common publication platforms include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Cerebral Cortex Communications

Among Bremmer's recent scholarly publications are:

  • Dynamics of Visual Perceptual Echoes Following Short-Term Visual Deprivation (2020), Cerebral Cortex Communications
  • Inter-trial phase coherence of visually evoked postural responses in virtual reality (2020), Experimental Brain Research
  • A Causal Role of Area hMST for Self-Motion Perception in Humans (2020), Cerebral Cortex Communications
  • Preattentive processing of visually guided self-motion in humans and monkeys (2021), Progress in Neurobiology
  • Multi-segment phase coupling to oscillatory visual drive (2021), Gait & Posture

Best Publications

  • Polymodal Motion Processing in Posterior Parietal and Premotor Cortex: A Human fMRI Study Strongly Implies Equivalencies between Humans and Monkeys

    Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer;Anja Schlack;Anja Schlack;N.Jon Shah;Oliver Zafiris

  • Spatial invariance of visual receptive fields in parietal cortex neurons

    Jean-René Duhamel;Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer;Suliann Benhamed;Werner Graf

  • Perception of self-motion from visual flow

    Markus Lappe;Frank Bremmer;A.V. van den Berg

  • Visual-vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP).

    Frank Bremmer;François Klam;Jean-René Duhamel;Jean-René Duhamel;Suliann Ben Hamed;Suliann Ben Hamed

  • Multisensory space representations in the macaque ventral intraparietal area.

    Anja Schlack;Susanne J. Sterbing-D'Angelo;Klaus Hartung;Klaus-Peter Hoffmann

  • Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis

    S. Ben Hamed;J.-R. Duhamel;F. Bremmer;W. Graf

  • Heading encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP).

    Frank Bremmer;Jean-René Duhamel;Jean-René Duhamel;Suliann Ben Hamed;Suliann Ben Hamed;Werner Graf

  • Eye position effects in monkey cortex. I. Visual and pursuit-related activity in extrastriate areas MT and MST.

    F. Bremmer;U. J. Ilg;A. Thiele;C. Distler

  • Space coding in primate posterior parietal cortex.

    Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer;Anja Schlack;Anja Schlack;Jean-René Duhamel;Werner Graf

  • Neural Dynamics of Saccadic Suppression

    Frank Bremmer;Michael Kubischik;Klaus Peter Hoffmann;Bart Krekelberg

  • Stimulation with a wireless intraocular epiretinal implant elicits visual percepts in blind humans.

    Susanne Klauke;Michael Goertz;Stefan Rein;Dirk Hoehl

  • Optic Flow Processing in Monkey STS: A Theoretical and Experimental Approach

    Markus Lappe;Frank Bremmer;Martin Pekel;Alexander Thiele

  • Eye Position Effects in Monkey Cortex. II. Pursuit- and Fixation-Related Activity in Posterior Parietal Areas LIP and 7A

    F. Bremmer;C. Distler;K.-P. Hoffmann

  • Differential aging of motion processing mechanisms: evidence against general perceptual decline.

    Jutta Billino;Frank Bremmer;Karl R. Gegenfurtner

  • Eye Position Effects on the Neuronal Activity of Dorsal Premotor Cortex in the Macaque Monkey

    Driss Boussaoud;Christophe Jouffrais;Frank Bremmer

  • Linear Vestibular Self-Motion Signals in Monkey Medial Superior Temporal Area

    F. Bremmer;M. Kubischik;M. Pekel;M. Lappe

  • Interaction of linear vestibular and visual stimulation in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP)

    Anja Schlack;Klaus-Peter Hoffmann;Frank Bremmer

  • Neural correlates of implied motion

    Bart Krekelberg;Sabine Dannenberg;Klaus-Peter Hoffmann;Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer

  • An fMRI study of optokinetic nystagmus and smooth-pursuit eye movements in humans.

    Christina S. Konen;Raimund Kleiser;Rüdiger J. Seitz;Frank Bremmer

  • Effects of aging on eye movements in the real world

    Stefan Dowiasch;Svenja Marx;Wolfgang Einhäuser;Frank Bremmer

  • The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion

    F. Bremmer;M. Lappe

Frequent Co-Authors

Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann Ruhr University Bochum
Markus Lappe
Markus Lappe University of Münster
Bart Krekelberg
Bart Krekelberg Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jean-René Duhamel
Jean-René Duhamel Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Karl R. Gegenfurtner
Karl R. Gegenfurtner University of Giessen
Alexander Thiele
Alexander Thiele Newcastle University
Gereon R. Fink
Gereon R. Fink University of Cologne
Tilo Kircher
Tilo Kircher Philipp University of Marburg
Suliann Ben Hamed
Suliann Ben Hamed Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Rüdiger J. Seitz
Rüdiger J. Seitz Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge of neuroscience opens up a range of career opportunities, many of which can be pursued through flexible online education options. Whether you're looking to enhance your qualifications or switch fields, there are many best online certificate programs that offer valuable skills and can increase your earning potential. These certificate programs can be especially useful in related fields such as mental health, behavioral analysis, and social work.

For adults balancing work and family, pursuing online classes for adults can provide flexibility and accessibility. These classes cover a diverse range of topics—making it easier to tailor your learning to your career goals.

Those interested in applied neuroscience, counseling, or therapy roles might consider more specialized graduate studies. For example, affordable online msw programs train future social workers to blend neuroscience with clinical practice. If you’re drawn to behavioral science, bcba masters programs online offer pathways to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst—a sought-after credential in education and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Bremmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles