World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
5557
World Ranking
9167
National Ranking
3870

Bart Krekelberg publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Krekelberg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 131 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Bart Krekelberg D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Krekelberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bart Krekelberg is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with notable contributions to Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Biomedical Engineering, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. The major topics covered in their work include Neural dynamics and brain function, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research.

Among their recent publications are:

  • A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of concurrent tES-fMRI studies (ContES checklist): a consensus study and statement, 2022, Nature Protocols
  • Brain network mechanisms of visual shape completion, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Steady state visual evoked potentials in schizophrenia: A review, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Dorsal attention network activity during perceptual organization is distinct in schizophrenia and predictive of cognitive disorganization, 2022, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Multiple sclerosis reduces synchrony of the magnocellular pathway, 2021, PLoS ONE

Bart Krekelberg has collaborated frequently with several researchers in their field. Among the most frequent co-authors are Brian P. Keane, Steven M. Silverstein, Deanna M. Barch, Ravi D. Mill, and Michael W. Cole. These collaborations reflect an engagement with multiple aspects of neuroscience research and its clinical applications.

Their work is published across various journals, indicating a broad engagement with the scientific community. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Protocols
  • PLoS ONE
  • Brain stimulation

The breadth of their research topics spans from detailed studies of brain connectivity and neural dynamics to investigations involving visual perception and brain stimulation methods. This multidisciplinary approach intersects with both basic science and clinical neuroscience, contributing to knowledge on neural function and disorders.

Best Publications

  • Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals

    Bart Krekelberg;Geoffrey M. Boynton;Richard J.A. van Wezel

  • Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation.

    Anli Liu;Mihály Vöröslakos;Gregory Kronberg;Simon Henin

  • Postsaccadic visual references generate presaccadic compression of space.

    Markus Lappe;Holger Awater;Bart Krekelberg

  • Neural Dynamics of Saccadic Suppression

    Frank Bremmer;Michael Kubischik;Klaus Peter Hoffmann;Bart Krekelberg

  • Visual perception and saccadic eye movements

    Michael Ibbotson;Bart Krekelberg

  • Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects.

    Bart Krekelberg;Markus Lappe

  • Neural correlates of implied motion

    Bart Krekelberg;Sabine Dannenberg;Klaus-Peter Hoffmann;Frank Bremmer;Frank Bremmer

  • Adaptation in Macaque MT Reduces Perceived Speed and Improves Speed Discrimination

    Bart Krekelberg;Richard J. A. van Wezel;Thomas D. Albright

  • A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.

    Bart Krekelberg;Markus Lappe

  • Implied motion from form in the human visual cortex.

    Bart Krekelberg;Argiro Vatakis;Zoe Kourtzi

  • Neural correlates of saccadic suppression in humans.

    Raimund Kleiser;Rüdiger J Seitz;Bart Krekelberg

  • Transcranial electrical stimulation over visual cortex evokes phosphenes with a retinal origin.

    Kohitij Kar;Bart Krekelberg

  • Interactions between Speed and Contrast Tuning in the Middle Temporal Area: Implications for the Neural Code for Speed

    Bart Krekelberg;Richard J. A. van Wezel;Thomas D. Albright

  • Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position.

    Bart Krekelberg;Markus Lappe

  • Linking form and motion in the primate brain

    Zoe Kourtzi;Bart Krekelberg;Richard J.A. van Wezel

  • Attention enhances adaptability: evidence from motion adaptation experiments.

    Amy Rezec;Bart Krekelberg;Karen R. Dobkins

  • Neural correlates of visual localization and perisaccadic mislocalization.

    Bart Krekelberg;Michael Kubischik;Klaus-Peter Hoffmann;Frank Bremmer

  • The position of moving objects

    Bart Krekelberg;Markus Lappe

  • The Position of Moving Objects

    Markus Lappe;Bart Krekelberg

  • Dynamics of Eye-Position Signals in the Dorsal Visual System

    Adam P. Morris;Michael Kubischik;Klaus-Peter Hoffmann;Bart Krekelberg

  • Motion Mechanisms in Macaque MT

    Bart Krekelberg;Thomas D. Albright

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Bremmer
Frank Bremmer Philipp University of Marburg
Thomas D. Albright
Thomas D. Albright Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Markus Lappe
Markus Lappe University of Münster
Steven M. Silverstein
Steven M. Silverstein University of Rochester Medical Center
Michael W. Cole
Michael W. Cole Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Karen R. Dobkins
Karen R. Dobkins University of California, San Diego
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Klaus-Peter Hoffmann Ruhr University Bochum
Til Ole Bergmann
Til Ole Bergmann University of Tübingen
Kaspar Althoefer
Kaspar Althoefer Queen Mary University of London
Deanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to diverse careers and advanced study options. While neuroscience is a specialized field, related online degrees can lead to impactful roles in healthcare, research, and counseling. For example, those interested in mental health might consider an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy, which prepares graduates to work with families and couples in various therapeutic settings.

Psychology is another popular pathway, often overlapping with neuroscience topics. If you're considering this route, you may want to explore how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology to help plan your education budget. Additionally, there are many flexible online degree psychology programs available, making this a convenient option for working professionals.

Social work is yet another in-demand field closely tied to neuroscience’s focus on human behavior and well-being. You can find masters in social work online programs that emphasize both theory and practical skills. Each of these pathways complements neuroscience studies and offers rewarding career opportunities in health, research, and community support.

Best Scientists Citing Bart Krekelberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles