World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
17373
World Ranking
4627
National Ranking
2086

Michael W. Cole publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Cole sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 123 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael W. Cole D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Cole sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael W. Cole is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. The scope of their work extends to related subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The main topics addressed in their publications include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Memory and Neural Mechanisms.

Michael W. Cole has contributed to numerous publications in various scientific venues. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Neuroscience

Significant recent papers associated with Michael W. Cole include:

  • "The Functional Relevance of Task-State Functional Connectivity," 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "A cortical hierarchy of localized and distributed processes revealed via dissociation of task activations, connectivity changes, and intrinsic timescales," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas," 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • "Exploring brain-behavior relationships in the N-back task," 2020, NeuroImage
  • "Flexible Coordinator and Switcher Hubs for Adaptive Task Control," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Ravi D. Mill
  • Takuya Ito
  • Brian P. Keane
  • Rubén Sánchez-Romero
  • Matthew F. Singh

Best Publications

  • Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control

    Michael W Cole;Jeremy R Reynolds;Jonathan D Power;Grega Repovs

  • Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain

    Michael W. Cole;Michael W. Cole;Danielle S. Bassett;Jonathan D. Power;Todd S. Braver

  • The cognitive control network: Integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions

    Michael W. Cole;Walter Schneider

  • The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease.

    Alan Anticevic;Michael W. Cole;John D. Murray;Philip R. Corlett

  • Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence

    Michael W. Cole;Tal Yarkoni;Grega Repovš;Alan Anticevic

  • Identifying the brain's most globally connected regions

    Michael W. Cole;Michael W. Cole;Sudhir Pathak;Walter Schneider

  • Mapping the human brain's cortical-subcortical functional network organization

    Jie Lisa Ji;Marjolein Spronk;Kaustubh R. Kulkarni;Grega Repovs

  • Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks.

    Matthew L. Dixon;Alejandro De La Vega;Caitlin Mills;Jessica Andrews-Hanna

  • Characterizing Thalamo-Cortical Disturbances in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Illness

    Alan Anticevic;Michael W. Cole;Grega Repovs;John D. Murray

  • Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations

    Michael W Cole;Takuya Ito;Danielle S Bassett;Douglas H Schultz

  • The Frontoparietal Control System A Central Role in Mental Health

    Michael W. Cole;Grega Repovš;Alan Anticevic

  • Altered global brain signal in schizophrenia

    Genevieve J. Yang;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs;Michael W. Cole

  • Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation

    Andrew T. Reid;Drew B. Headley;Ravi D. Mill;Ruben Sanchez-Romero

  • Global Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Identifies Frontal Cortex, Striatal, and Cerebellar Dysconnectivity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Alan Anticevic;Sien Hu;Sheng Zhang;Aleksandar Savic

  • Global prefrontal and fronto-amygdala dysconnectivity in bipolar I disorder with psychosis history.

    Alan Anticevic;Alan Anticevic;Margaret S. Brumbaugh;Anderson M. Winkler;Anderson M. Winkler;Lauren E. Lombardo

  • Variable global dysconnectivity and individual differences in schizophrenia.

    Michael W. Cole;Alan Anticevic;Grega Repovs;Deanna

  • Higher Intelligence Is Associated with Less Task-Related Brain Network Reconfiguration.

    Douglas H. Schultz;Michael W. Cole

  • Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control.

    Michael W. Cole;Patryk Laurent;Andrea Stocco

  • Task activations produce spurious but systematic inflation of task functional connectivity estimates.

    Michael W. Cole;Takuya Ito;Douglas Schultz;Ravi D. Mill

  • N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonist Effects on Prefrontal Cortical Connectivity Better Model Early Than Chronic Schizophrenia

    Alan Anticevic;Philip R. Corlett;Michael W. Cole;Aleksandar Savic

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Anticevic
Alan Anticevic Yale University
Todd S. Braver
Todd S. Braver Washington University in St. Louis
Grega Repovs
Grega Repovs University of Ljubljana
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Walter Schneider
Walter Schneider University of Pittsburgh
John D. Murray
John D. Murray Yale University
Bart Krekelberg
Bart Krekelberg Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Xiao-Jing Wang
Xiao-Jing Wang New York University
Nachshon Meiran
Nachshon Meiran Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Cole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles