World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
20207
World Ranking
2495
National Ranking
1184

Alan Anticevic publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Anticevic sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 268 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alan Anticevic D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Anticevic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan Anticevic is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and has a significant body of research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research has been published extensively in venues such as Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Psychiatry, Schizophrenia, and Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. Biological Psychiatry accounts for the largest number of publications from their work.

The main topics of Alan Anticevic's research focus on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, and Mental Health Research Topics. Other notable focal areas include Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Schizophrenia Research and Treatment, Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders, and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research.

Several recent papers reflect the scope and diversity of their research interests:

  • Generative modeling of brain maps with spatial autocorrelation (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders (2020, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups (2020, American Journal of Psychiatry)
  • Psilocybin Induces Time-Dependent Changes in Global Functional Connectivity (2020, Biological Psychiatry)
  • Greater male than female variability in regional brain structure across the lifespan (2020, Human Brain Mapping)

Frequent collaborators with Alan Anticevic include John D. Murray, Jie Lisa Ji, Grega Repovš, Clara Fonteneau, and Zailyn Tamayo, highlighting an extensive network of partnerships within the neuroscience and psychiatry research communities.

Best Publications

  • Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control

    Michael W Cole;Jeremy R Reynolds;Jonathan D Power;Grega Repovs

  • The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease.

    Alan Anticevic;Michael W. Cole;John D. Murray;Philip R. Corlett

  • Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence

    Michael W. Cole;Tal Yarkoni;Grega Repovš;Alan Anticevic

  • Hierarchy of transcriptomic specialization across human cortex captured by structural neuroimaging topography.

    Joshua B. Burt;Murat Demirtaş;William J. Eckner;Natasha M. Navejar

  • Mapping the human brain's cortical-subcortical functional network organization

    Jie Lisa Ji;Marjolein Spronk;Kaustubh R. Kulkarni;Grega Repovs

  • Characterizing Thalamo-Cortical Disturbances in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Illness

    Alan Anticevic;Michael W. Cole;Grega Repovs;John D. Murray

  • The Frontoparietal Control System A Central Role in Mental Health

    Michael W. Cole;Grega Repovš;Alan Anticevic

  • Generative modeling of brain maps with spatial autocorrelation

    Joshua B. Burt;Markus Helmer;Maxwell Shinn;Alan Anticevic

  • Association of Thalamic Dysconnectivity and Conversion to Psychosis in Youth and Young Adults at Elevated Clinical Risk

    Alan Anticevic;Kristen Haut;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs

  • Altered global brain signal in schizophrenia

    Genevieve J. Yang;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs;Michael W. Cole

  • Hierarchical Heterogeneity across Human Cortex Shapes Large-Scale Neural Dynamics

    Murat Demirtaş;Joshua B. Burt;Markus Helmer;Jie Lisa Ji

  • Changes in global and thalamic brain connectivity in LSD-induced altered states of consciousness are attributable to the 5-HT2A receptor.

    Katrin H Preller;Joshua B Burt;Jie Lisa Ji;Charles H Schleifer

  • When less is more: TPJ and default network deactivation during encoding predicts working memory performance

    Alan Anticevic;Grega Repovs;Gordon L. Shulman;M Deanna

  • Searching for Cross-Diagnostic Convergence: Neural Mechanisms Governing Excitation and Inhibition Balance in Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders

    Jennifer H. Foss-Feig;Brendan D. Adkinson;Jie Lisa Ji;Genevieve Yang

  • Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data.

    Matthew F. Glasser;Matthew F. Glasser;Timothy S. Coalson;Janine D. Bijsterbosch;Samuel J. Harrison

  • Global Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis Identifies Frontal Cortex, Striatal, and Cerebellar Dysconnectivity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Alan Anticevic;Sien Hu;Sheng Zhang;Aleksandar Savic

  • Linking Microcircuit Dysfunction to Cognitive Impairment: Effects of Disinhibition Associated with Schizophrenia in a Cortical Working Memory Model

    John D. Murray;Alan Anticevic;Alan Anticevic;Mark Gancsos;Megan Ichinose

  • Amygdala Recruitment in Schizophrenia in Response to Aversive Emotional Material: A Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging Studies

    Alan Anticevic;Jared X. Van Snellenberg;Rachel E. Cohen;Grega Repovs

  • Cortical Abnormalities Associated With Pediatric and Adult Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group

    Premika S.W. Boedhoe;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • Ketamine Treatment and Global Brain Connectivity in Major Depression

    Chadi G Abdallah;Lynnette A Averill;Katherine A Collins;Paul Geha

  • NMDA receptor function in large-scale anticorrelated neural systems with implications for cognition and schizophrenia

    Alan Anticevic;Mark Gancsos;John D. Murray;Grega Repovs

  • Global prefrontal and fronto-amygdala dysconnectivity in bipolar I disorder with psychosis history.

    Alan Anticevic;Alan Anticevic;Margaret S. Brumbaugh;Anderson M. Winkler;Anderson M. Winkler;Lauren E. Lombardo

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Murray
John D. Murray Yale University
John H. Krystal
John H. Krystal Yale University
Grega Repovs
Grega Repovs University of Ljubljana
Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
Michael Cole
Michael Cole University of East London
David C. Glahn
David C. Glahn Boston Children's Hospital
Carrie E. Bearden
Carrie E. Bearden University of California, Los Angeles
Xiao-Jing Wang
Xiao-Jing Wang New York University
Deanna M. Barch
Deanna M. Barch Washington University in St. Louis
Carles Soriano-Mas
Carles Soriano-Mas University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying neuroscience in the USA, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can broaden your options. Careers in mental health, behavioral science, and clinical research often require additional specialized training and credentials. Many students choose flexible online programs to fit their studies around work or personal commitments.

For those considering roles in social work or counseling, there are affordable msw programs online as well as fast track social work degree online options. Both provide training to work with individuals and communities on mental health and well-being.

If you’re interested in applied behavioral analysis, pursuing a bcba degree online can qualify you for roles supporting individuals with autism spectrum disorders or behavioral challenges.

Finally, those looking for a quicker entry into the mental health field may opt for an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology. This path can serve as a stepping stone for graduate study in neuroscience or clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Anticevic

Trending Scientists