World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
48919
World Ranking
1475
National Ranking
881

Jennifer Crocker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer Crocker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jennifer Crocker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer Crocker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2015 - Donald T. Campbell Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology
  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jennifer Crocker is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences and psychology, with a particular focus on the intersection of technology, health, and social behavior.

Their recent research contributions include:

  • Social Media Use and Its Link to Physical Health Indicators, 2022, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
  • Understanding Whites' perceptions of multicultural policies: A (non)zero-sum framework?, 2020, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • Prosocial Orientations: Distinguishing Compassionate Goals From Other Constructs, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Perceived social support-giving moderates the association between social relationships and interleukin-6 levels in blood, 2021, Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Compassionate goals predict COVID-19 health behaviors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, 2021, PLoS ONE

Frequent coauthors of Jennifer Crocker include:

  • Tao Jiang
  • Amy Canevello
  • David S. Lee
  • Baldwin M. Way
  • T. Parker Ballinger

The most common publication venues for their work are:

  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • PLoS ONE

Jennifer Crocker's primary fields of study include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychology

Within these fields, their work focuses on several subfields:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Health

The main topics addressed in Jennifer Crocker's research involve:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Throughout their career, Jennifer Crocker has received several honors, including:

  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 1993
  • Donald T. Campbell Award, Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2015
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2018
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2019

Best Publications

  • Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.

    Jennifer Crocker;Brenda Major

  • A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity

    Riia Luhtanen;Jennifer Crocker

  • Contingencies of self-worth.

    Jennifer Crocker;Connie T. Wolfe

  • The Costly Pursuit of Self-Esteem.

    Jennifer Crocker;Lora E. Park

  • Contingencies of self-worth in college students: theory and measurement.

    Jennifer Crocker;Riia K. Luhtanen;M. Lynne Cooper;Alexandra Bouvrette

  • Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias.

    Jennifer Crocker;Riia Luhtanen

  • Collective Self-Esteem and Psychological Well-Being among White, Black, and Asian College Students

    Jennifer Crocker;Riia Luhtanen;Bruce Blaine;Stephanie Broadnax

  • Cognitive Processes in the Revision of Stereotypic Beliefs

    Reneé Weber;Jennifer Crocker

  • Social Stigma: The Affective Consequences of Attributional Ambiguity

    Jennifer Crocker;Kristin Voelkl;Maria Testa;Brenda Major

  • Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: the role of compassionate and self-image goals.

    Jennifer Crocker;Amy Canevello

  • Stigma: Introduction and overview.

    John F. Dovidio;Brenda Major;Jennifer Crocker

  • Self-Esteem and Self-Serving Biases in Reactions to Positive and Negative Events: An Integrative Review

    Bruce Blaine;Jennifer Crocker

  • Race and self-esteem: meta-analyses comparing whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians and comment on Gray-Little and Hafdahl (2000).

    Jean M. Twenge;Jennifer Crocker

  • Coping with Negative Stereotypes about Intellectual Performance: The Role of Psychological Disengagement

    Brenda Major;Steven Spencer;Toni Schmader;Connie Wolfe

  • Judgment of Covariation by Social Perceivers

    Jennifer Crocker

  • Downward comparison, prejudice, and evaluations of others: effects of self-esteem and threat.

    Jennifer Crocker;Leigh L. Thompson;Kathleen M. McGraw;Cindy Ingerman

  • The stigma of overweight: affective consequences of attributional ambiguity.

    Jennifer Crocker;Beth Cornwell;Brenda Major

  • When grades determine self-worth: consequences of contingent self-worth for male and female engineering and psychology majors.

    Jennifer Crocker;Andrew Karpinski;Diane M. Quinn;Sara K. Chase

  • Why Does Writing About Important Values Reduce Defensiveness? Self-Affirmation and the Role of Positive Other-Directed Feelings

    Jennifer Crocker;Yu Niiya;Dominik Mischkowski

  • Creating Good Relationships: Responsiveness, Relationship Quality, and Interpersonal Goals

    Amy Canevello;Jennifer Crocker

  • Contingencies of Self-Worth

    Jennifer Crocker;Katherine M. Knight

Frequent Co-Authors

Brenda Major
Brenda Major University of California, Santa Barbara
Diane M. Quinn
Diane M. Quinn University of Connecticut
Brad J. Bushman
Brad J. Bushman The Ohio State University
Scott J. Moeller
Scott J. Moeller Stony Brook University
James L. Abelson
James L. Abelson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Baldwin M. Way
Baldwin M. Way The Ohio State University
Hart Blanton
Hart Blanton Texas A&M University
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles
M. Lynne Cooper
M. Lynne Cooper University of Missouri
Lauren B. Alloy
Lauren B. Alloy Temple University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to diverse career paths. Many students interested in psychology also consider related fields such as social work, counseling, and human services. Today, online degree options have become more accessible and flexible, making it easier for students to balance their studies with other responsibilities.

If you’re interested in social work, there are accelerated online social work degrees in Arizona that allow you to complete your education quickly and efficiently. Similarly, students can explore accelerated online bsw degrees in USA for online bachelor’s programs across the country.

For those based on the West Coast, accelerated online social work degrees in California offer region-specific options that can help launch a career in this vital field. In the Northeast, students can choose from the fastest online social work degree programs in Massachusetts to pursue their professional goals.

Exploring these related degree pathways can expand your opportunities in mental health, advocacy, and community outreach—fields closely connected to a background in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer Crocker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles