World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
32997
World Ranking
3937
National Ranking
2203

M. Lynne Cooper publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Lynne Cooper sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

M. Lynne Cooper D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Lynne Cooper sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Lynne Cooper is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their recent research contributions span several interdisciplinary areas, with notable focus on conservation techniques and studies.

Among their publications are the following papers:

  • Challenges and Opportunities for Psychological Research in the Majority World, 2024, Collabra Psychology
  • 2020 Board of Directors member-at-large candidate: M. Lynne Cooper, PhD, 2020, PsycEXTRA Dataset
  • Teaching Preventive Conservation: Interdisciplinary Origins and Evolution, 2025, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

Their research has appeared in various academic venues, including:

  • Collabra Psychology
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset
  • Journal of the American Institute for Conservation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with M. Lynne Cooper include:

  • Ayşe K. Üskül
  • Amber Gayle Thalmayer
  • Allan B. I. Bernardo
  • Roberto González
  • Anna Kende

Their work mainly engages topics related to conservation, specifically conservation techniques and studies. This subfield represents the core focus of recent publications.

Best Publications

  • Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: testing a model of the work-family interface.

    M R Frone;M Russell;M L Cooper

  • Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: development and validation of a four-factor model

    M. Lynne Cooper

  • Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions : a motivational model of alcohol use

    M. L. Cooper;M. R. Frone;M. Russell;P. Mudar

  • Contingencies of self-worth in college students: theory and measurement.

    Jennifer Crocker;Riia K. Luhtanen;M. Lynne Cooper;Alexandra Bouvrette

  • Attachment Styles, Emotion Regulation, and Adjustment in Adolescence

    M. Lynne Cooper;Phillip R. Shaver;Nancy L. Collins

  • Relation of work–family conflict to health outcomes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents

    Michael R. Frone;Marcia Russell;M. Lynne Cooper

  • Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence

    M Lynne Cooper

  • Surveying the damage: a review of research on consequences of alcohol misuse in college populations.

    H Wesley Perkins

  • Prevalence of work-family conflict: Are work and family boundaries asymmetrically permeable?

    Michael R. Frone;Marcia Russell;M. Lynne Cooper

  • Development and validation of a three-dimensional measure of drinking motives.

    M. Lynne Cooper;Marcia Russell;Jeremy B. Skinner;Michael Windle

  • Association Between Self-reported Childhood Sexual Abuse and Adverse Psychosocial Outcomes : Results From a Twin Study

    Elliot C. Nelson;Andrew C. Heath;Pamela A. F. Madden;M. Lynne Cooper

  • A motivational perspective on risky behaviors: the role of personality and affect regulatory processes.

    M. Lynne Cooper;V. Bede Agocha;Melanie S. Sheldon

  • Coping, expectancies, and alcohol abuse: A test of social learning formulations.

    M. Lynne Cooper;Marcia Russell;William H. George

  • Personality and the predisposition to engage in risky or problem behaviors during adolescence.

    M Lynne Cooper;Phillip K Wood;Holly K Orcutt;Austin Albino

  • Personal resilience, cognitive appraisals, and coping: an integrative model of adjustment to abortion

    B Major;C Richards;M L Cooper;C Cozzarelli

  • A longitudinal model of social contact, social support, depression, and alcohol use.

    R S Peirce;M R Frone;M Russell;M L Cooper

  • Perceived social support, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion

    B Major;C Cozzarelli;A M Sciacchitano;M L Cooper

  • Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion.

    Brenda Major;Catherine Cozzarelli;M. Lynne Cooper;Josephine Zubek

  • Motivational models of substance use: A review of theory and research on motives for using alcohol, marijuana, and tobacco.

    M. Lynne Cooper;Emmanuel Kuntsche;Ash Levitt;Lindsay L Barber

  • Attachment styles and adolescent sexuality.

    Jessica L. Tracy;Phillip R. Shaver;Austin W. Albino;M. Lynne Cooper

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Frone
Michael R. Frone University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Pamela A. F. Madden
Pamela A. F. Madden Washington University in St. Louis
Holly K. Orcutt
Holly K. Orcutt Northern Illinois University
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Emmanuel Kuntsche
Emmanuel Kuntsche La Trobe University
Arpana Agrawal
Arpana Agrawal Washington University in St. Louis
William H. George
William H. George University of Washington
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Kathleen K. Bucholz
Kathleen K. Bucholz Washington University in St. Louis
Phillip K. Wood
Phillip K. Wood University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a diverse set of career pathways in the mental health field. A popular route for psychology graduates is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). However, it’s important to note that licensing requirements for MFTs vary by city and state.

For example, you can learn more about Irving mft certification requirements if you’re interested in practicing in Texas. If Florida fascinates you, check out this guide on how to become a marriage and family therapist in Jacksonville. Each location has specific educational standards, clinical experience needs, and exam criteria.

For those looking at the northeast, review mft requirements in Jersey City to get a clear idea of local expectations. If the Midwest is your goal, learn how to become an mft in Kansas City for local licensing steps.

No matter where you choose to practice, an online degree in psychology can provide a flexible foundation for advancing your career in mental health, therapy, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing M. Lynne Cooper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles