World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
5404
World Ranking
9304
National Ranking
782

Klaus Funke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Funke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Klaus Funke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Funke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Funke is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany and specializes in neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including neurology, cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, clinical psychology, and developmental neuroscience.

The main topics of their work focus on transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, neural dynamics and brain function, vestibular and auditory disorders, neurological disorders and treatments, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, photoreceptor and optogenetics research, and sleep and wakefulness research.

Frequent publication venues where Funke's research appears include Clinical Neurophysiology, European Journal of Neuroscience, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, Developmental Neurobiology, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Among their recent scientific papers are:

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper, 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic and deep brain stimulation on long-range synchrony of oscillatory activity in a rat model of developmental schizophrenia, 2021, European Journal of Neuroscience
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reverses reduced excitability of rat visual cortex induced by dark rearing during early critical period, 2020, Developmental Neurobiology
  • Effects of iTBS-rTMS on the Behavioral Phenotype of a Rat Model of Maternal Immune Activation, 2021, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Methodological comparison of different approaches to cultivate postnatal organotypic hippocampal cultures, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors in their work include Gleb Barmashenko, B. Lippmann, Verena Aliane, Hartwig R. Siebner, and Aman S. Aberra.

Best Publications

  • Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects

    A. Suppa;Y.-Z. Huang;K. Funke;M.C. Ridding

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? – A consensus and critical position paper

    Unknown

  • Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation

    G. Cirillo;G. Di Pino;F. Capone;F. Ranieri

  • Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single-unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex

    Vera Moliadze;Yongqiang Zhao;Ulf Eysel;Klaus Funke

  • Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alters Cortical Inhibition

    Alia Benali;Jörn Trippe;Elke Weiler;Annika Mix

  • Modulation of cortical inhibition by rTMS – findings obtained from animal models

    Klaus Funke;Alia Benali

  • State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex

    Florentin Wörgötter;Katrin Suder;Yongqiang Zhao;Nicolas Kerscher

  • Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces plasticity of inhibitory synapses

    Maximilian Lenz;Christos Galanis;Florian Müller-Dahlhaus;Alexander Opitz

  • High- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially activates c-Fos and zif268 protein expression in the rat brain.

    Selcen Aydin-Abidin;Jörn Trippe;Klaus Funke;Ulf T. Eysel

  • Theta burst and conventional low-frequency rTMS differentially affect GABAergic neurotransmission in the rat cortex

    Jörn Trippe;Annika Mix;Selcen Aydin-Abidin;Klaus Funke

  • Locus Coeruleus Activation Facilitates Memory Encoding and Induces Hippocampal LTD that Depends on β-Adrenergic Receptor Activation

    Neal Lemon;Selcen Aydin-Abidin;Klaus Funke;Denise Manahan-Vaughan

  • Dose-Dependence of Changes in Cortical Protein Expression Induced with Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Theta-Burst Stimulation in the Rat

    Lukas J. Volz;Alia Benali;Annika Mix;Ute Neubacher

  • Somatosensory areas in the telencephalon of the pigeon

    K. Funke

  • Effects of repetitive TMS on visually evoked potentials and EEG in the anaesthetized cat: dependence on stimulus frequency and train duration.

    Selcen Aydin-Abidin;Vera Moliadze;Ulf T. Eysel;Klaus Funke

  • Continuous and intermittent transcranial magnetic theta burst stimulation modify tactile learning performance and cortical protein expression in the rat differently.

    Annika Mix;Alia Benali;Ulf T. Eysel;Klaus Funke

  • EEG-dependent modulation of response dynamics of cat dLGN relay cells and the contribution of corticogeniculate feedback.

    Klaus Funke;Ulf T. Eysel

  • The influence of corticofugal feedback on the temporal structure of visual responses of cat thalamic relay cells.

    F. Wörgötter;E. Nelle;B. Li;K. Funke

  • Inverse correlation of firing patterns of single topographically matched perigeniculate neurons and cat dorsal lateral geniculate relay cells

    Klaus Funke;Ulf T. Eysel

  • Time-course of changes in neuronal activity markers following iTBS-TMS of the rat neocortex.

    Kathrin Hoppenrath;Klaus Funke

  • GABA-from Inhibition to Cognition: Emerging Concepts.

    T Schmidt-Wilcke;E Fuchs;K Funke;A Vlachos

  • Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol applied to visual cortex of anaesthetized cat: effects on visually evoked single-unit activity

    Vera Moliadze;Dimitrios Giannikopoulos;Ulf T. Eysel;Klaus Funke

  • Somatosensory areas in the telencephalon of the pigeon. I. Response characteristics.

    K. Funke

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulf T. Eysel
Ulf T. Eysel Ruhr University Bochum
Florentin Wörgötter
Florentin Wörgötter University of Göttingen
Andreas Vlachos
Andreas Vlachos University of Freiburg
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann University of Tübingen
Christine Winter
Christine Winter Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Thomas Deller
Thomas Deller Goethe University Frankfurt
Alexander Opitz
Alexander Opitz University of Minnesota
Richard Anthony Edward Edden
Richard Anthony Edward Edden Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Nicolaas A.J. Puts
Nicolaas A.J. Puts King's College London
Hans-Christian Pape
Hans-Christian Pape University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in pursuing neuroscience but looking for flexibility? Many students now explore accelerated online degrees to save time and fast-track their education. These programs allow you to complete your studies at a quicker pace, which can help you enter the workforce sooner or begin graduate studies.

Career potential is another important factor. Neuroscience intersects with some of the highest paying degrees, especially in fields like biotech, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare. In fact, some neuroscience-related fields are listed among the most lucrative college majors in the country, offering strong salaries and growth opportunities.

Affordability is also key for many students. You can find quality programs among the cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA, making it easier to reduce debt and finance your education. Exploring these online pathways can open up flexible, affordable, and rewarding routes into the exciting world of neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Funke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles