World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11515 10826 5903 5461 508 50683

Philippe Généreux publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philippe Généreux between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philippe Généreux published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 23 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2017. 7 of the 482 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 68. Peak 68 publications in 2017. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 53 publications 2014: 61 publications 2015: 64 publications 2016: 67 publications 2017: 68 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
2005 2025

482 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philippe Généreux: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 4
2011 14
2012 38
2013 53
2014 61
2015 64
2016 67
2017 68
2018 31
2019 28
2020 27
2021 16
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
2025 5
Total 482
Download as CSV

Philippe Généreux publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Généreux sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 508 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 508
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philippe Généreux D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philippe Généreux sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philippe Généreux is affiliated with Morristown Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their research primarily revolves around several main topics including:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Aortic Thrombus and Embolism

The scientist's work is documented in numerous academic papers, with notable publications including:

  • "Mortality After Repeat Revascularization Following PCI or CABG for Left Main Disease," 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • "Complete Revascularization vs Culprit Lesion-Only Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Angina-Related Quality of Life in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction," 2022, JAMA Cardiology
  • "2-Year Outcomes After Stenting of Lipid-Rich and Nonrich Coronary Plaques," 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "IMPACT OF INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION OF THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY VERSUS OTHER CORONARY ARTERIES AFTER PCI: INSIGHTS FROM THE RIVER-PCI TRIAL," 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "TCT-614 Successful Treatment of MAC Patients With Atrial Fixation TMVR device: The AltaValve," 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Généreux's publications have appeared frequently in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JAMA Cardiology
  • Structural Heart
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Roxana Mehran
  • Gregg W. Stone
  • Vlasis Ninios
  • John Saxon
  • Gennaro Giustino

Their research spans subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Epidemiology. This multi-disciplinary approach supports a wide-ranging investigation of cardiac health, clinical interventions, and surgical outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients

    Michael J. Mack;Martin B. Leon;Vinod H. Thourani;Raj Makkar

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Joseph F. Sabik;Patrick W. Serruys;Charles A. Simonton

  • Effect of Platelet Inhibition with Cangrelor during PCI on Ischemic Events

    Deepak L. Bhatt;Gregg W. Stone;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;C. Michael Gibson

  • Frailty in Older Adults Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The FRAILTY-AVR Study

    Jonathan Afilalo;Sandra Lauck;Dae H. Kim;Thierry Lefèvre

  • Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;A. Pieter Kappetein;Joseph F. Sabik;Stuart J. Pocock

  • Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial

    Ziad A Ali;Akiko Maehara;Philippe Généreux;Richard A Shlofmitz

  • Clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using valve Academic Research Consortium definitions: A weighted meta-analysis of 3,519 patients from 16 studies

    Philippe Généreux;Stuart J. Head;Nicolas M. Van Mieghem;Susheel Kodali

  • Clinical Trial Design Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: Part 2: Endpoint Definitions: A Consensus Document From the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium.

    Gregg W. Stone;David H. Adams;William T. Abraham;Arie Pieter Kappetein

  • Vascular Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial

    Philippe Généreux;John G. Webb;Lars G. Svensson;Susheel K. Kodali

  • Coronary artery calcification: pathogenesis and prognostic implications.

    Mahesh V. Madhavan;Madhusudhan Tarigopula;Gary S. Mintz;Akiko Maehara

  • The impact of frailty status on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center experience.

    Philip Green;Abigail E. Woglom;Philippe Genereux;Benoit Daneault

  • Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage.

    Philippe Généreux;Philippe Généreux;Philippe Pibarot;Björn Redfors;Michael J Mack

  • Ischemic outcomes after coronary intervention of calcified vessels in acute coronary syndromes. Pooled analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) and ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy) TRIALS.

    Philippe Généreux;Mahesh V. Madhavan;Gary S. Mintz;Akiko Maehara

  • Paravalvular Leak After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The New Achilles' Heel? A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

    Philippe Généreux;Stuart J. Head;Rebecca Hahn;Benoit Daneault

  • Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials

    Tullio Palmerini;Umberto Benedetto;Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani;Diego Della Riva

  • Quantification and Impact of Untreated Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) Score

    Philippe Généreux;Tullio Palmerini;Adriano Caixeta;Gregg Rosner

  • Incidence, Predictors, and Impact of Post-Discharge Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Philippe Genereux;Gennaro Giustino;Bernhard Witzenbichler;Giora Weisz

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ajay J. Kirtane
Ajay J. Kirtane Columbia University
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Akiko Maehara
Akiko Maehara Columbia University
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Gary S. Mintz
Gary S. Mintz Columbia University Medical Center
Susheel Kodali
Susheel Kodali Columbia University Medical Center
George Dangas
George Dangas Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mathew R. Williams
Mathew R. Williams New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of medicine in the USA connects with a range of healthcare careers, many of which are now accessible through flexible online learning. For those interested in healthcare administration or digital health records, pursuing an online health information management degree can open pathways to in-demand roles managing patient data.

If you prefer working with medical records and insurance, consider enrolling in a low cost medical coding and billing online program. These programs teach skills for accurate processing of healthcare services and are a gateway to remote job opportunities.

Nursing careers continue to grow in demand, and online degree options are expanding. Those looking to become advanced practice nurses might explore cheap online fnp programs to become Family Nurse Practitioners. Alternatively, aspiring leaders and educators in nursing can benefit from the cheapest online msn programs to earn a Master of Science in Nursing.

These online options offer flexible, affordable pathways to a rewarding healthcare career—whether at the bedside, behind the scenes, or in a leadership role.

Best Scientists Citing Philippe Généreux

Trending Scientists