World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
37063
World Ranking
3455
National Ranking
1943

Linn Van Dyne publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linn Van Dyne sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Linn Van Dyne D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linn Van Dyne sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linn Van Dyne is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Psychology, Social Sciences, and Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on multiple subfields such as Social Psychology, Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, and Applied Psychology.

The main topics addressed in Van Dyne's work include:

  • International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Van Dyne's recent publications demonstrate engagement with organizational and psychological themes. One paper, published in 2021 in Business Horizons, is titled "Organizational CQ: Cultural intelligence for 21st-century organizations." Another paper, appearing in 2020 within the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, is titled "When do you benefit? Differential boundary conditions facilitate positive affect and buffer negative affect after helping others."

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Van Dyne include:

  • David Livermore
  • Soon Ang
  • Thomas Rockstuhl
  • Matthias Spitzmüller
  • Guihyun Park

Van Dyne has contributed to publication venues such as:

  • Business Horizons
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Best Publications

  • Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity

    Linn Van Dyne;Jeffrey A. LePine

  • Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs

    Linn Van Dyne;Soon Ang;Isabel C. Botero

  • Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and Effects on Cultural Judgment and Decision Making, Cultural Adaptation and Task Performance

    Soon Ang;Linn Van Dyne;Christine Koh;K. Yee Ng

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Construct Redefinition, Measurement, and Validation

    Linn Van Dyne;Jill W. Graham;Richard M. Dienesch

  • Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior

    Linn Van Dyne;Jon L. Pierce

  • Predicting voice behavior in work groups.

    Jeffrey A. LePine;Linn Van Dyne

  • Personality Correlates of the Four-Factor Model of Cultural Intelligence

    Soon Ang;Linn Van Dyne;Christine Koh

  • Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability.

    Jeffrey A. LePine;Linn Van Dyne

  • Complex interdependence in task-performing groups

    Richard Saavedra;P. Christopher Earley;Linn Van Dyne

  • Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore

    Linn Van Dyne;Soon Ang

  • Handbook of Cultural Intelligence: Theory, Measurement, and Applications

    Soon Ang;Linn Van Dyne

  • From Experience to Experiential Learning: Cultural Intelligence as a Learning Capability for Global Leader Development

    Kok-Yee Ng;Linn Van Dyne;Soon Ang

  • Conceptualization of Cultural Intelligence: Definition, Distinctiveness, and Nomological Network

    Soon Ang;Linn Van Dyne

  • Sub-dimensions of the four factor model of cultural intelligence : expanding the conceptualization and measurement of cultural intelligence

    Linn Van Dyne;Soon Ang;Kok Yee Ng;Thomas Rockstuhl

  • Psychological Ownership: An Empirical Examination of its Consequences

    Don Vandewalle;Linn Van Dyne;Tatiana Kostova

  • The Joint Effects of Personality and Workplace Social Exchange Relationships in Predicting Task Performance and Citizenship Performance

    Dishan Kamdar;Linn Van Dyne

  • Beyond General Intelligence (IQ) and Emotional Intelligence (EQ): The Role of Cultural Intelligence (CQ) on Cross‐Border Leadership Effectiveness in a Globalized World

    Thomas Rockstuhl;Stefan Seiler;Soon Ang;Linn Van Dyne

  • Employee Voice Behavior: Interactive Effects of LMX and Power Distance in the United States and Colombia

    Isabel C. Botero;Linn Van Dyne

  • Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: a field study of restaurant employees

    Christina L. Stamper;Linn Van Dyne

  • Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting

    Linn Van Dyne;Don Vandewalle;Tatiana Kostova;Michael E. Latham

  • Development and Validation of the CQS: The Cultural Intelligence Scale

    Linn Van Dyne;Soon Ang;Christine Koh

  • Individualism-Collectivism as a Boundary Condition for Effectiveness of Minority Influence in Decision Making.

    K. Yee Ng;Linn Van Dyne

Frequent Co-Authors

Soon Ang
Soon Ang Nanyang Technological University
Jon L. Pierce
Jon L. Pierce University of Minnesota
Donald E. Conlon
Donald E. Conlon Michigan State University
Russell E. Johnson
Russell E. Johnson Michigan State University
Ellen Ernst Kossek
Ellen Ernst Kossek Purdue University West Lafayette
Tatiana Kostova
Tatiana Kostova University of South Carolina
Lois E. Tetrick
Lois E. Tetrick George Mason University
Lynn M. Shore
Lynn M. Shore Colorado State University
Ann Marie Ryan
Ann Marie Ryan Michigan State University
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology unlocks a range of rewarding career pathways, from mental health counseling to social work. With increasing demand for skilled professionals in the human services sector, online study makes it more accessible than ever to qualify for these roles.

Many states require specific degrees to work as a licensed social worker. For example, the social worker degree requirements in Kansas mandate a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in Social Work depending on the level of practice. Meanwhile, the social worker degree requirements in Kentucky also outline both undergraduate and graduate pathways for state licensure.

If you are considering a move or remote practice, it’s important to note variations such as the Louisiana minimum degree requirement for social workers and the Maine minimum degree requirement for social workers. Each state has its own professional standards, so researching these ahead of time will help you choose the most suitable program for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Linn Van Dyne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles