World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1567 1464 12 12 90 9607

Bård Kuvaas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bård Kuvaas between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bård Kuvaas published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2016. 6 of the 100 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2016. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

100 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bård Kuvaas: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 0
2006 2
2007 1
2008 5
2009 4
2010 5
2011 4
2012 6
2013 8
2014 9
2015 5
2016 11
2017 10
2018 6
2019 3
2020 4
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
2024 1
2025 5
Total 100
Download as CSV

Bård Kuvaas publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bård Kuvaas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 90–94 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 90 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111 90
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Bård Kuvaas D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bård Kuvaas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Bård Kuvaas is affiliated with BI Norwegian Business School in Norway and has focused research within the fields of Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Their scholarly contributions primarily address Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Safety Research, and Accounting.

The topics covered in Kuvaas's work include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Capital and Networks
  • Community Health and Development

Notable papers authored by Kuvaas and their collaborators comprise:

  • Individual variable pay for performance, controlling effects, and intrinsic motivation, 2020, Motivation and Emotion
  • Illegitimate tasks: A systematic literature review and agenda for future research, 2022, Work & Stress
  • A Literature Review of Social and Economic Leader-Member Exchange, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Using necessary condition analysis in managerial psychology research: introduction, empirical demonstration and methodological discussion, 2023, Journal of Managerial Psychology
  • Exploring the necessary roles of basic psychological needs at work: A necessary condition analysis, 2025, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Kuvaas include:

  • Haien Ding
  • Robert Buch
  • Anders Dysvik
  • Ingvild Andersen
  • Dominique Kost

The main publication venues where Kuvaas's research appears are:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Work & Stress
  • Motivation and Emotion
  • Frontiers in Psychology

This research profile depicts a scholarly trajectory centered on investigating motivational, behavioral, and organizational dynamics in workplace settings, enriched by interdisciplinary insights spanning social psychology and economic behaviors.

Best Publications

  • Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation

    Bård Kuvaas

  • An exploration of how the employee-organization relationship affects the linkage between perception of developmental human resource practices and employee outcomes

    Bard Kuvaas

  • Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: the roles of pay administration and pay level

    Bård Kuvaas

  • Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes

    Bård Kuvaas;Anders Dysvik

  • Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance

    Bård Kuvaas;Anders Dysvik

  • The relationship between perceived training opportunities, work motivation and employee outcomes

    Anders Dysvik;Bård Kuvaas

  • Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes

    Bård Kuvaas;Robert Buch;Antoinette Weibel;Anders Dysvik

  • Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance

    Anders Dysvik;Bård Kuvaas

  • Exploring the relative and combined influence of mastery‐approach goals and work intrinsic motivation on employee turnover intention

    Anders Dysvik;Bård Kuvaas

  • A test of hypotheses derived from self‐determination theory among public sector employees

    Bård Kuvaas

  • Different relationships between perceptions of developmental performance appraisal and work performance

    Bård Kuvaas

  • Do you get what you pay for? Sales incentives and implications for motivation and changes in turnover intention and work effort

    Bård Kuvaas;Robert Buch;Marylène Gagné;Anders Dysvik

  • Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals

    Anders Dysvik;Bård Kuvaas

  • An investigation of the unique, synergistic and balanced relationships between basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation

    Anders Dysvik;Bård Kuvaas;Marylène Gagné

  • Economic and social leader–member exchange relationships and follower performance

    Bård Kuvaas;Robert Buch;Anders Dysvik;Thorvald Hærem

  • The interactive role of performance appraisal reactions and regular feedback

    Bård Kuvaas

  • Perceived job autonomy and turnover intention – The moderating role of perceived supervisor support

    Anders Dysvik;Bård Kuvaas

  • Mutuality in leader–subordinate empowerment expectation: Its impact on role ambiguity and intrinsic motivation ☆

    Sut I Wong Humborstad;Bård Kuvaas

  • Effects of attribute framing on cognitive processing and evaluation

    Bård Kuvaas;Marcus Selart

  • Antecedents and Employee Outcomes of Line Managers' Perceptions of Enabling HR Practices

    Bård Kuvaas;Anders Dysvik;Robert Buch

  • Perceived training intensity and knowledge sharing: Sharing for intrinsic and prosocial reasons

    Bård Kuvaas;Robert Buch;Anders Dysvik

  • The Destructiveness of Laissez-Faire Leadership Behavior: The Mediating Role of Economic Leader–Member Exchange Relationships

    Robert Buch;Øyvind Lund Martinsen;Bård Kuvaas

  • Employee ownership and affective organizational commitment: employees’ perceptions of fairness and their preference for company shares over cash

    Bård Kuvaas

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders Dysvik
Anders Dysvik BI Norwegian Business School
Marylène Gagné
Marylène Gagné Curtin University
Eddy S. Ng
Eddy S. Ng Queen's University
Lynn M. Shore
Lynn M. Shore Colorado State University
Birgit Schyns
Birgit Schyns NEOMA Business School
Elaine Farndale
Elaine Farndale Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in business and management offers tremendous flexibility and access to diverse career pathways. Students can now pursue leadership roles through advanced programs like an online phd organizational leadership, which is ideal for those looking to influence organizations at the highest level.

Choosing the right online institution is crucial. Enrolling in nationally accredited online colleges ensures a quality education recognized by employers and professional bodies.

The scope of online study isn’t limited to conventional management. For those interested in specialized fields, programs such as the best online construction management degree offer targeted skills for in-demand sectors. Similarly, students seeking roles in healthcare leadership can benefit from online healthcare administration programs.

Whether advancing a current role or pivoting to a new industry, these online degree pathways provide flexible, accredited options tailored to individual career goals within the business and management landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Bård Kuvaas

Trending Scientists