World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
16544
World Ranking
7785
National Ranking
204

Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 198 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke is affiliated with the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands. Their work focuses on academic research in a medical and scientific context within this institution.

No specific recent papers or publications are listed for this researcher, which limits detailed insight into their recent scientific contributions. There is also no available data on frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications, so the collaborative and publishing patterns cannot be described.

The main and subfields of study, as well as the primary topics of work associated with this scientist, have not been provided. Therefore, identifying the exact scientific domains or thematic focus areas in their research is not possible.

There is no information regarding awards or distinctions received by this individual, which means that recognized accolades cannot be cited.

Based on the available source data, Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke is an active researcher connected to a major medical center in the Netherlands, though more specific details about their academic output and specializations are not accessible at this time.

Best Publications

  • Microglia in Physiology and Disease

    Susanne A Wolf;H W G M Boddeke;Helmut Kettenmann

  • Mesenchymal Differentiation Mediated by NF-κB Promotes Radiation Resistance in Glioblastoma

    Krishna P.L. Bhat;Veerakumar Balasubramaniyan;Brian Vaillant;Ravesanker Ezhilarasan

  • Neuronal ‘On’ and ‘Off’ signals control microglia

    Knut Biber;Harald Neumann;Kazuhide Inoue;Hendrikus W.G.M. Boddeke

  • Glioma-associated microglia/macrophages display an expression profile different from M1 and M2 polarization and highly express Gpnmb and Spp1.

    Frank Szulzewsky;Andreas Pelz;Xi Feng;Michael Synowitz

  • BRAIN SELECTIVE-INHIBITION OF ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE - A NOVEL-APPROACH TO THERAPY FOR ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE

    Albert Enz;Rene Amstutz;H. Boddeke;G. Gmelin

  • Identification of a microglia phenotype supportive of remyelination

    Marta Olah;Sandra Amor;Sandra Amor;Nieske Brouwer;Jonathan Vinet

  • Inhibition of calcineurin inhibits the desensitization of capsaicin evoked currents in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurones from adult rats

    RJ Docherty;JC Yeats;S Bevan;Hendrikus Boddeke

  • Expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha after focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat

    M. Buttini;K. Appel;A. Sauter;P.-J. Gebicke-Haerter

  • Partial agonists, full agonists, antagonists: dilemmas of definition.

    Daniel Hoyer;Hendrikus W.G.M. Boddeke

  • Induction of interleukin-1β mRNA after focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat

    M Buttini;A Sauter;Hendrikus Boddeke

  • Region-specific expression of immunoregulatory proteins on microglia in the healthy CNS

    Alexander H. De Haas;Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke;Knut Biber

  • Microglia Phenotype Diversity

    M. Olah;Knut Biber;J. Vinet;Hendrikus Boddeke

  • Neuroprotective function for ramified microglia in hippocampal excitotoxicity.

    Jonathan Vinet;Hilmar R J van Weering;Annette Heinrich;Roland E Kälin

  • CXCR3-Dependent Microglial Recruitment Is Essential for Dendrite Loss after Brain Lesion

    Angelika Rappert;Ingo Bechmann;Tatyana Pivneva;Jacqueline Mahlo

  • Peripheral lipopolysaccharide stimulation induces interleukin-1β messenger RNA in rat brain microglial cells

    M. Buttini;Hendrikus Boddeke

  • Expression and signaling of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors in astrocytes and microglia.

    Knut Biber;DJ Laurie;A Berthele;B Sommer

  • Differential and time-dependent expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mRNA by astrocytes and macrophages in rat brain: effects of ischemia and peripheral lipopolysaccharide administration.

    Nouciba G Gourmala;Manuel Buttini;Sarah Limonta;André Sauter

  • Neuronal Chemokines: Versatile Messengers In Central Nervous System Cell Interaction

    A. H. de Haas;H. R. J. van Weering;E. K. de Jong;H. W. G. M. Boddeke

  • Expression of interleukin-1 beta in rat dorsal root ganglia

    J.C.V.M. Copray;I. Mantingh;N. Brouwer;K. Biber

  • Ischemia-induced neuronal expression of the microglia attracting chemokine Secondary Lymphoid-tissue Chemokine (SLC).

    Knut Biber;André Sauter;Nieske Brouwer;Sjef C.V.M. Copray

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart J. L. Eggen
Bart J. L. Eggen University Medical Center Groningen
Helmut Kettenmann
Helmut Kettenmann Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology
Sabita Roy
Sabita Roy University of Miami
Rodrigo A. Cunha
Rodrigo A. Cunha University of Coimbra
Paula Agostinho
Paula Agostinho University of Coimbra
David J. Volsky
David J. Volsky Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Guadalupe Mengod
Guadalupe Mengod Spanish National Research Council
Daniel Hoyer
Daniel Hoyer University of Melbourne
Sandra Amor
Sandra Amor University of Amsterdam
Kazuhide Inoue
Kazuhide Inoue Kyushu University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of careers in research, healthcare, and biotechnology. Many graduates are exploring further education to expand their career opportunities. One popular option is pursuing the cheapest online MBA healthcare management programs, which help bridge the gap between science and leadership roles in the healthcare industry.

Another growing area is medical billing and coding, which plays a crucial role in healthcare administration. Professionals can choose between different certifications, and it is useful to understand the differences in ccs vs cpc certification to determine which path best fits your career goals. Both certifications can impact earning potential, and many wonder, how much does a medical coder make? Salaries often vary by experience and certification level.

The medical coding field offers solid job prospects, but like any role, it comes with strengths and challenges. If you’re interested in the employment outlook and what to expect in this profession, review the medical coding job outlook before making your decision. Combining a background in biology or biochemistry with these additional skills can lead to diverse and rewarding careers in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Hendrikus W. G. M. Boddeke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles