World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
87991
World Ranking
4820
National Ranking
2613

Matthew J. Ellis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 531 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthew J. Ellis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Ellis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Matthew J. Ellis is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research has a strong focus on medicine, particularly within oncology, cancer research, and molecular biology subfields.

Their recent publications reflect contributions to understanding cancer biology and treatment. Notable papers include:

  • Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group, 2020, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Proteogenomic characterization of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 2021, Cell
  • Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy, 2020, Cell
  • Proteogenomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma, 2020, Cell
  • Proteogenomic insights into the biology and treatment of HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, 2021, Cancer Cell

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, including:

  • Meenakshi Anurag
  • Jonathan T. Lei
  • Bing Zhang
  • Shunqiang Li
  • Lacey E. Dobrolecki

Their work has been published in a range of venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Cancer Research
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cell
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The main fields of study for this researcher are medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Specific subfields include oncology, cancer research, molecular biology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and genetics.

Their primary research topics cover:

  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways

Matthew J. Ellis has also been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Daniel C. Koboldt;Robert S. Fulton;Michael D. McLellan;Heather Schmidt

  • Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes

    Joel S. Parker;Michael Mullins;Maggie C.U. Cheang;Samuel Leung

  • Circulating Tumor Cells, Disease Progression, and Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer

    Massimo Cristofanilli;G. Thomas Budd;Matthew J. Ellis;Alison Stopeck

  • Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer

    Maggie C. U. Cheang;Stephen K Chia;David Voduc;Dongxia Gao

  • Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group

    Mitch Dowsett;Torsten O. Nielsen;Roger A’Hern;John Bartlett

  • Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer

    Joseph A. Sparano;Robert J. Gray;Della F. Makower;Kathleen I. Pritchard

  • The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms

    Zhiyuan Hu;Cheng Fan;Daniel S Oh;JS Marron

  • Letrozole Is More Effective Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy Than Tamoxifen for ErbB-1– and/or ErbB-2–Positive, Estrogen Receptor–Positive Primary Breast Cancer: Evidence From a Phase III Randomized Trial

    Matthew J. Ellis;Andrew Coop;Baljit Singh;Louis Mauriac

  • Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer

    Philipp Mertins;D. R. Mani;Kelly V. Ruggles;Michael A. Gillette;Michael A. Gillette

  • Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer

    J. A. Sparano;R. J. Gray;D. F. Makower;K. I. Pritchard

  • Proteogenomic characterization of human colon and rectal cancer

    Bing Zhang;Jing Wang;Xiaojing Wang;Jing Zhu

  • Genome remodelling in a basal-like breast cancer metastasis and xenograft

    Li Ding;Matthew J C Ellis;Shunqiang Li;David E. Larson

  • CDK4/6 inhibition triggers anti-tumour immunity

    Shom Goel;Molly J. DeCristo;April C. Watt;Haley BrinJones

  • Circulating Tumor Cells at Each Follow-up Time Point during Therapy of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Predict Progression-Free and Overall Survival

    Daniel F. Hayes;Massimo Cristofanilli;G. Thomas Budd;Matthew J. Ellis

  • Whole-genome analysis informs breast cancer response to aromatase inhibition

    Matthew J. Ellis;Li Ding;Dong Shen;Jingqin Luo

  • Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of Human High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

    Hui Zhang;Tao Liu;Zhen Zhang;Samuel H. Payne

  • Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: A randomized double-blind multicenter study

    W. Eiermann;S. Paepke;J. Appfelstaedt;A. Llombart-Cussac

  • Activating HER2 Mutations in HER2 Gene Amplification Negative Breast Cancer

    Ron Bose;Shyam M. Kavuri;Adam C. Searleman;Wei Shen

  • Phase I Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Activity Study of Lapatinib (GW572016), a Reversible Dual Inhibitor of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, in Heavily Pretreated Patients With Metastatic Carcinomas

    Howard A. Burris;Herbert I. Hurwitz;E. Claire Dees;Afshin Dowlati

  • A Comparison of PAM50 Intrinsic Subtyping with Immunohistochemistry and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Tamoxifen-Treated Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer

    Torsten O Nielsen;Joel S Parker;Samuel Leung;K David Voduc

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles M. Perou
Charles M. Perou University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Elaine R. Mardis
Elaine R. Mardis The Ohio State University
Li Ding
Li Ding Washington University in St. Louis
Steven A. Carr
Steven A. Carr Broad Institute
David Fenyö
David Fenyö New York University
Torsten O. Nielsen
Torsten O. Nielsen University of British Columbia
Eric P. Winer
Eric P. Winer Yale University
Vera J. Suman
Vera J. Suman Mayo Clinic
Bing Zhang
Bing Zhang Baylor College of Medicine
Richard D. Smith
Richard D. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a doctor. There are a variety of online degree programs that support alternative pathways into healthcare careers. Many students and professionals look for flexible, affordable options to start or advance their journey.

For those interested in essential administrative roles, the average cost of medical billing and coding program remains quite accessible, making it a smart entry point to the field. If you’re aiming for clinical leadership, there are also cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs geared toward licensed nurses looking to specialize or expand their practice.

Registered Nurses can continue their education with a range of online nursing courses designed to fit busy schedules. For those aspiring to roles in research, academia, or advanced clinical practice, online phd nursing programs offer flexibility and support, enabling career advancement while working.

Online healthcare degrees provide flexibility and affordability, empowering students to pursue rewarding roles in medicine, administration, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Ellis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles