World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
18750
World Ranking
12298
National Ranking
5260

Carlo C. Maley publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo C. Maley sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 338 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Carlo C. Maley D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carlo C. Maley sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carlo C. Maley is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans numerous subfields including molecular biology, cancer research, genetics, oncology, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas such as cancer genomics and diagnostics, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, evolution and genetic dynamics, cancer cells and metastasis, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, and mathematical biology tumor growth.

Key recent publications by Carlo C. Maley include:

  • Transition to invasive breast cancer is associated with progressive changes in the structure and composition of tumor stroma (2022) in Cell
  • Cancer risk across mammals (2021) in Nature
  • Extrachromosomal DNA in the cancerous transformation of Barrett's oesophagus (2023) in Nature
  • Exploiting evolutionary steering to induce collateral drug sensitivity in cancer (2020) in Nature Communications
  • Identifying key questions in the ecology and evolution of cancer (2020) in Evolutionary Applications

Frequent co-authors working alongside Carlo C. Maley include Lorraine King, Jeffrey R. Marks, Luis Cisneros, Athena Aktipis, and Diego Mallo.

The scientist has published regularly in several venues, with the most frequent being bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cancer Research, Nature Communications, Evolution Medicine and Public Health, and Nature.

Best Publications

  • Clonal evolution in cancer

    Mel Greaves;Carlo C. Maley

  • Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process.

    Lauren M.F. Merlo;John W. Pepper;Brian J. Reid;Carlo C. Maley

  • Genetic clonal diversity predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma

    Carlo C. Maley;Patricia C. Galipeau;Jennifer C. Finley;V. Jon Wongsurawat

  • Pan-cancer analysis of the extent and consequences of intratumor heterogeneity

    Noemi Andor;Trevor A Graham;Marnix Jansen;Li C Xia

  • The Human Tumor Atlas Network: Charting Tumor Transitions Across Space and Time at Single-Cell Resolution

    Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen;Aviv Regev;Aviv Regev;Aviv Regev;Philipp Oberdoerffer;Tal Nawy

  • Cancer across the tree of life: cooperation and cheating in multicellularity

    C. Athena Aktipis;Amy M. Boddy;Gunther Jansen;Urszula Hibner

  • Is eating behavior manipulated by the gastrointestinal microbiota? Evolutionary pressures and potential mechanisms.

    Joe Alcock;Carlo C. Maley;C. Athena Aktipis

  • Potential Mechanisms for Cancer Resistance in Elephants and Comparative Cellular Response to DNA Damage in Humans

    Lisa M Abegglen;Aleah Fox Caulin;Ashley Chan;Kristy Lee

  • Classifying the evolutionary and ecological features of neoplasms

    Carlo C. Maley;Athena Aktipis;Trevor A. Graham;Andrea Sottoriva

  • Peto's Paradox: evolution's prescription for cancer prevention.

    Aleah F. Caulin;Carlo C. Maley

  • Progress in chemoprevention drug development: the promise of molecular biomarkers for prevention of intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer--a plan to move forward.

    Gary J. Kelloff;Scott M. Lippman;Andrew J. Dannenberg;Caroline C. Sigman

  • NSAIDs Modulate CDKN2A, TP53, and DNA Content Risk for Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

    Patricia C Galipeau;Xiaohong Li;Patricia L Blount;Patricia L Blount;Carlo C Maley

  • Selectively Advantageous Mutations and Hitchhikers in Neoplasms: p16 Lesions Are Selected in Barrett's Esophagus

    Carlo C. Maley;Patricia C. Galipeau;Xiaohong Li;Carissa A. Sanchez

  • Life history trade-offs in cancer evolution

    C. Athena Aktipis;Amy M. Boddy;Robert A. Gatenby;Joel S. Brown

  • Genomic Instability in Cancer: Teetering on the Limit of Tolerance

    Noemi Andor;Carlo C. Maley;Carlo C. Maley;Hanlee P. Ji

  • The combination of genetic instability and clonal expansion predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

    Carlo C. Maley;Patricia C. Galipeau;Xiaohong Li;Carissa A. Sanchez

  • A comprehensive survey of clonal diversity measures in Barrett's esophagus as biomarkers of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma

    Lauren M.F. Merlo;Najaf A. Shah;Xiaohong Li;Patricia L. Blount;Patricia L. Blount

  • Temporal and spatial evolution of somatic chromosomal alterations: a case-cohort study of Barrett's esophagus.

    Xiaohong Li;Patricia C. Galipeau;Thomas G. Paulson;Carissa A. Sanchez

  • Single-cell genotyping demonstrates complex clonal diversity in acute myeloid leukemia

    Amy L. Paguirigan;Jordan Smith;Soheil Meshinchi;Martin Carroll

  • Extent of Low-Grade Dysplasia Is a Risk Factor for the Development of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus

    Amitabh Srivastava;Jason L Hornick;Xiaohong Li;Patricia L Blount;Patricia L Blount

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian J. Reid
Brian J. Reid Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Jeffrey R. Marks
Jeffrey R. Marks Duke University
Trevor A. Graham
Trevor A. Graham Institute of Cancer Research
Peter S. Rabinovitch
Peter S. Rabinovitch University of Washington
Robert D. Odze
Robert D. Odze Brigham and Women's Hospital
Thomas L. Vaughan
Thomas L. Vaughan University of Washington
Joseph Y. Lo
Joseph Y. Lo Duke University
Maciej A. Mazurowski
Maciej A. Mazurowski Duke University
Robert B. West
Robert B. West Stanford University
Kornelia Polyak
Kornelia Polyak Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA can open diverse career opportunities in healthcare, research, and industry. For students seeking fast-track options, the fastest nutrition degree programs online are increasingly popular, blending an understanding of biological sciences with health and wellness practice.

Those interested in the management side of healthcare may benefit from the cheapest online mba in healthcare management. This path equips graduates for leadership roles while being budget-friendly and flexible for busy professionals.

Allied health roles, like medical coding, are also in high demand. Comparing the certified coding specialist certificates (CPC vs. CCS) is crucial for choosing the right credential for your goals. Each certification offers unique benefits, costs, and salary prospects in the growing field of healthcare data.

Curious about the earning potential in this pathway? Find out how much does a medical coder make and explore further steps to enter this rewarding career. Whether aiming for clinical work, research, or administrative healthcare roles, online degrees can broaden your options.

Best Scientists Citing Carlo C. Maley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles