World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
11447
World Ranking
9891
National Ranking
754

R.D.G. Theakston publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.D.G. Theakston sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 176 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

R.D.G. Theakston D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.D.G. Theakston sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

R.D.G. Theakston is affiliated with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their work is situated within the broader context of tropical medicine, reflecting the institution's focus on diseases that predominantly affect tropical and subtropical regions.

There are no specific records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or recurring publication venues linked to this researcher in the provided data. Similarly, there are no details available regarding book publications, field or subfield specializations, or the main topics they have covered in their research.

No awards or honors are listed in the available information. The scientist is currently active, with no indication that they are deceased.

Best Publications

  • A novel Syk-dependent mechanism of platelet activation by the C-type lectin receptor CLEC-2

    Katsue Suzuki-Inoue;Gemma L J Fuller;Angel Garcia;Johannes A Eble

  • Report of a WHO workshop on the standardization and control of antivenoms.

    R.D.G Theakston;D.A Warrell;D.A Warrell;E Griffiths

  • Purification, cloning, and molecular characterization of a high molecular weight hemorrhagic metalloprotease, jararhagin, from Bothrops jararaca venom. Insights into the disintegrin gene family

    M. J. I. Paine;H. P. Desmond;R. D. G. Theakston;J. M. Crampton

  • MICRO-ELISA FOR DETECTING AND ASSAYING SNAKE VENOM AND VENOM-ANTIBODY

    R.D.G Theakston;M Jane Lloyd-Jones;H.A Reid

  • Randomized comparative trial of three antivenoms in the treatment of envenoming by lance-headed vipers (Bothrops jararaca) in São Paulo, Brazil

    J. L. C. Cardoso;H. W. Fan;F. O. S. França;M. T. Jorge

  • Insights into the mechanism of haemorrhage caused by snake venom metalloproteinases.

    A. S. Kamiguti;C. R. M. Hay;R. D. G. Theakston;M. Zuzel

  • Approximate LD50 determinations of snake venoms using eight to ten experimental animals.

    J. Meier;R.D.G. Theakston

  • Paralysis, Rhabdomyolysis and Haemolysis Caused by Bites of Russell's Viper (Vipera russelli pulchella) in Sri Lanka: Failure of Indian (Haffkine) Antivenom

    R E Phillips;R D Theakston;D A Warrell;Y Galigedara

  • First clinical experiences with a new ovine Fab Echis ocellatus snake bite antivenom in Nigeria: randomized comparative trial with Institute Pasteur Serum (Ipser) Africa antivenom.

    W. P. Meyer;A. G. Habib;A. A. Onayade;A. Yakubu

  • Severe and fatal mass attacks by 'killer' bees (Africanized honey bees--Apis mellifera scutellata) in Brazil: clinicopathological studies with measurement of serum venom concentrations.

    F. O.S. Franca;L. A. Benvenuti;H. W. Fan;D. R. Dos Santos

  • Antivenoms: A list of hyperimmune sera currently available for the treatment of envenoming by bites and stings

    R.D.G. Theakston;D.A. Warrell;D.A. Warrell

  • Crisis in snake antivenom supply for Africa.

    R. D. G. Theakston;D. A. Warrell

  • Processing of pro-tumor necrosis factor-alpha by venom metalloproteinases: a hypothesis explaining local tissue damage following snake bite.

    Ana Maria Moura-da-Silva;Gavin David Laing;Mark John Ingraham Paine;Jeremy Michael Thomas Jonathan Dennison

  • Clinical trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of Bothrops and Lachesis bites in the north eastern Amazon region of Brazil.

    Pedro Pereira de Oliveira Pardal;Suzana Medeiro Souza;Maria Rita de Cássia da Costa Monteiro;Hui Wen Fan

  • Snake bites by the jararacuçu (Bothrops jararacussu): clinicopathological studies of 29 proven cases in São Paulo State, Brazil

    R Milani Júnior;M T Jorge;F P de Campos;F P Martins

  • The application of immunoassay techniques, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), to snake venom research

    R.D.G. Theakston

  • Combining mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphological data to infer species boundaries: phylogeography of lanceheaded pitvipers in the Brazilian Atlantic forest, and the status of Bothrops pradoi (Squamata: Serpentes: Viperidae)

    G. Puorto;M. Da Graça Salomão;R. D. G. Theakston;R. S. Thorpe

  • Pan-African polyspecific antivenom produced by caprylic acid purification of horse IgG: an alternative to the antivenom crisis in Africa

    J.M. Gutiérrez;E. Rojas;L. Quesada;G. León

  • Positive response to edrophonium in patients with neurotoxic envenoming by cobras (Naja naja philippinensis). A placebo-controlled study.

    George Watt;R.D.G. Theakston;Curtis G. Hayes;Manuel L. Yambao

  • Randomized comparative trial of three monospecific antivenoms for bites by the Malayan pit viper (Calloselasma rhodostoma) in southern Thailand: clinical and laboratory correlations.

    Warrell Da;Warrell Da;Warrell Da;Looareesuwan S;Theakston Rd;Phillips Re;Phillips Re;Phillips Re

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Warrell
David A. Warrell University of Oxford
Rodney E. Phillips
Rodney E. Phillips University of Oxford
Ana M. Moura-da-Silva
Ana M. Moura-da-Silva Instituto Butantan
Mark J. I. Paine
Mark J. I. Paine Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Wolfgang Wüster
Wolfgang Wüster Bangor University
José María Gutiérrez
José María Gutiérrez University of Costa Rica
Sornchai Looareesuwan
Sornchai Looareesuwan Mahidol University
John Harris
John Harris Newcastle University
Carlos R. Diniz
Carlos R. Diniz Ezequiel Dias Foundation
Stuart D. Carter
Stuart D. Carter University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to diverse online degree options and fast-paced career pathways. Many students interested in health sciences and human biology may look into specialized programs that complement their learning.

For those fascinated by movement science and wellness, a best online kinesiology degree offers flexible, in-depth study of the mechanics of body movement and rehabilitation. If your focus is mental health care, the fastest pmhnp program can help you quickly qualify as a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

Nurses seeking advancement might consider post masters fnp programs that enable them to become Family Nurse Practitioners online and at an accelerated pace. Meanwhile, students with a passion for nutrition can pursue an online nutritionist degree in an affordable way while preparing for licensure and certification.

These pathways demonstrate how online studies can support a wide range of biology-related careers and professional growth for students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing R.D.G. Theakston

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles