World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
17386
World Ranking
2199
National Ranking
1104

Rebecca E. Grinter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca E. Grinter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 135 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rebecca E. Grinter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca E. Grinter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2008 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Rebecca E. Grinter is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study, primarily focusing on Social Sciences and Computer Science, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, and Human-Computer Interaction.

Their work covers key topics including Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Digital Games and Media, and Digital Economy and Work Transformation. These areas reflect the intersections between social behavior, technological development, and digital environments.

Rebecca E. Grinter has recently contributed to academic literature with the publication titled Romancing the Algorithm in 2022. This paper appeared in the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction and has received citations indicating its engagement within the scholarly community.

  • Romancing the Algorithm, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

The researcher has collaborated with several co-authors, which demonstrates their involvement in interdisciplinary or collaborative research projects. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Vishal Sharma
  • Kirsten Bray
  • Neha Kumar

Their publications are primarily found in venues such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, a platform focusing on the relationship between humans and digital systems.

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Rebecca E. Grinter has been recognized by the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) with distinctions that mark professional achievements within the computing community. These awards include the ACM Senior Member status attained in 2008 and the ACM Distinguished Member title awarded in 2009.

Best Publications

  • At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges

    W. Keith Edwards;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development

    Lilly Irani;Janet Vertesi;Paul Dourish;Kavita Philip

  • Instant messaging in teen life

    Rebecca E. Grinter;Leysia Palen

  • Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway's law revisited

    James D. Herbsleb;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration

    James D. Herbsleb;Audris Mockus;Thomas A. Finholt;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • Making sense of sensing systems: five questions for designers and researchers

    Victoria Bellotti;Maribeth Back;W. Keith Edwards;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed

    James D. Herbsleb;Audris Mockus;Thomas A. Finholt;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work

    Rebecca E. Grinter;James D. Herbsleb;Dewayne E. Perry

  • Architectures, coordination, and distance: Conway's law and beyond

    J.D. Herbsleb;R.E. Grinter

  • y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg

    Rebecca E. Grinter;Margery A. Eldridge

  • Security in the wild: user strategies for managing security as an everyday, practical problem

    Paul Dourish;E. Grinter;Jessica Delgado de la Flor;Melissa Joseph

  • Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class

    Ari Schlesinger;W. Keith Edwards;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • Wan2tlk?: everyday text messaging

    Rebecca Grinter;Margery Eldridge

  • User interface for data presentation systems

    Thomas J. Ball;Kenneth Charles Cox;Rebecca Elizabeth Grinter;Stacie Lynn Hibino

  • Getting to green: understanding resource consumption in the home

    Marshini Chetty;David Tran;Rebecca E. Grinter

  • Sotto voce: exploring the interplay of conversation and mobile audio spaces

    Paul M. Aoki;Rebecca E. Grinter;Amy Hurst;Margaret H. Szymanski

  • "My Roomba is Rambo": intimate home appliances

    Ja-Young Sung;Lan Guo;Rebecca E. Grinter;Henrik I. Christensen

  • Quality versus quantity: e-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload

    Victoria Bellotti;Nicolas Ducheneaut;Mark Howard;Ian Smith

  • Revisiting the visit: understanding how technology can shape the museum visit

    Rebecca E. Grinter;Paul M. Aoki;Margaret H. Szymanski;James D. Thornton

  • The work to make a home network work

    Rebecca E. Grinter;W. Keith Edwards;Mark W. Newman;Nicolas Ducheneaut

  • Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction Focusing on the Holistic Interaction Experience

    James Everett Young;James Everett Young;Ja-Young Sung;Amy Voida;Ehud Sharlin

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Keith Edwards
W. Keith Edwards Georgia Institute of Technology
Paul M. Aoki
Paul M. Aoki Google (United States)
Allison Woodruff
Allison Woodruff Google (United States)
James D. Herbsleb
James D. Herbsleb Carnegie Mellon University
Henrik I. Christensen
Henrik I. Christensen University of California, San Diego
Diana K. Smetters
Diana K. Smetters Google (United States)
Dirk Balfanz
Dirk Balfanz Google (United States)
Nicolas Ducheneaut
Nicolas Ducheneaut Quantic Foundry
Amy Hurst
Amy Hurst New York University
Ellen W. Zegura
Ellen W. Zegura Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science studies in the USA opens up many accessible and flexible online education options. For those looking for a quick start, you might ask, what degree can I get online in 6 months? Several fast-track associate programs provide foundational tech skills, perfect for career changers.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Luckily, there are affordable online colleges offering bachelor’s degrees in Computer Science, IT, and related fields. These institutions make quality education accessible, regardless of your financial situation.

If business and management attract you, consider the cheapest online business management degree programs, which can complement your technical skills with leadership training, broadening your career opportunities.

Engineering is another popular pathway, with engineering schools online providing flexible, industry-relevant options for those passionate about innovation and problem-solving.

Whatever your academic or career goals, online degree programs in the USA offer a range of affordable and flexible paths to success in tech and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca E. Grinter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles