World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
14458
World Ranking
10448
National Ranking
4366

Diana K. Smetters publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana K. Smetters sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 83 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Diana K. Smetters D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana K. Smetters sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diana K. Smetters is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their professional profile is centered in the field of academic research within a major technology company. The available data does not list specific recent papers, coauthors, or publication venues related to their work.

No information is provided regarding book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics associated with their career. Additionally, there are no documented awards or distinctions linked to their name.

Despite the limited publicly available data, the association with Google implies involvement in areas connected to technology, research, or development projects within a leading global organization focused on internet services and products.

Best Publications

  • Networking named content

    Van Jacobson;Diana K. Smetters;James D. Thornton;Michael F. Plass

  • Named Data Networking (NDN) Project

    Lixia Zhang;Deborah Estrin;Jeffrey Burke;Van Jacobson

  • Talking to Strangers: Authentication in Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks.

    Dirk Balfanz;Diana K. Smetters;Paul Stewart;H. Chi Wong

  • Networking named content

    Van Jacobson;Diana K. Smetters;James D. Thornton;Michael Plass

  • VoCCN: voice-over content-centric networks

    Van Jacobson;Diana K. Smetters;Nicholas H. Briggs;Michael F. Plass

  • Building an Encrypted and Searchable Audit Log.

    Brent R. Waters;Dirk Balfanz;Glenn Durfee;Diana K. Smetters

  • Detecting Action Potentials in Neuronal Populations with Calcium Imaging

    Diana Smetters;Ania Majewska;Rafael Yuste

  • Secret handshakes from pairing-based key agreements

    D. Balfanz;G. Durfee;N. Shankar;D. Smetters

  • Session migration over content-centric networks

    James D. Thornton;Van L. Jacobson;Diana K. Smetters

  • Controlling the spread of interests and content in a content centric network

    Van L. Jacobson;Diana K. Smetters

  • Voice over content centric networks

    Paul J. Stewart;Van L. Jacobson;Michael F. Plass;Diana K. Smetters

  • Ad hoc secure access to documents and services

    Mark Stringer;Elisabeth Soutloglou;Diana K. Smetters

  • In search of usable security: five lessons from the field

    D. Balfanz;G. Durfee;D.K. Smetters;R.E. Grinter

  • Service virtualization over content-centric networks

    James D. Thornton;Van L. Jacobson;Diana K. Smetters

  • Method and system for securely Sharing files

    Dirk Balfanz;Teresa Lunt;Diana Smetters;Ken Conley

  • Method and apparatus for establishing and using a secure credential infrastructure

    Dirk Balfanz;Diana K. Smetters;Paul Joseph Stewart;Glenn E. Durfee

  • Moving from the design of usable security technologies to the design of useful secure applications

    D. K. Smetters;R. E. Grinter

  • NETWORKS OF COACTIVE NEURONS IN DEVELOPING LAYER 1

    Theodore H. Schwartz;Daniel Rabinowitz;Vivek Unni;Vikram S. Kumar

  • Using speakeasy for ad hoc peer-to-peer collaboration

    W. Keith Edwards;Mark W. Newman;Jana Z. Sedivy;Trevor F. Smith

  • Method and system for printing documents from a portable device

    Kurt E. Partridge;James M.A. Begole;Diana K. Smetters

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Balfanz
Dirk Balfanz Google (United States)
Van Jacobson
Van Jacobson University of California, Los Angeles
Rebecca E. Grinter
Rebecca E. Grinter Georgia Institute of Technology
Elizabeth F. Churchill
Elizabeth F. Churchill Google (United States)
Cristina V. Lopes
Cristina V. Lopes University of California, Irvine
Nicolas Ducheneaut
Nicolas Ducheneaut Quantic Foundry
Shahram Izadi
Shahram Izadi Google (United States)
W. Keith Edwards
W. Keith Edwards Georgia Institute of Technology
Ivan Soltesz
Ivan Soltesz Stanford University
Rafael Yuste
Rafael Yuste Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative academic pathways can boost your computer science education and career outcomes. Today, you can pursue high-demand credentials related to tech and management entirely online—often at a fraction of the cost and time of traditional programs.

For those looking to specialize in data analytics, the cheapest masters in data science programs offer robust curricula with financial accessibility. If your interests lean toward managing large projects, consider an accelerated construction management degree—these fast-track programs are great for those eager to enter or advance in this growing field.

Aspiring tech leaders can benefit from an cheap mba online, blending business acumen with technical know-how. For a quicker route to advanced qualifications, explore a one year masters degree online—ideal for career changers or professionals seeking rapid advancement.

These options highlight the flexibility, affordability, and accelerated timelines available to modern learners, making it easier than ever to tailor your academic journey to fit your career goals in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Diana K. Smetters

Recently Published Articles