World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5301
World Ranking
10348
National Ranking
39

Ita Richardson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ita Richardson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 218 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ita Richardson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ita Richardson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ita Richardson is affiliated with the University of Limerick in Ireland and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Information Systems. Their research encompasses a range of interdisciplinary topics including General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Rehabilitation.

The primary areas of study for Richardson include Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Privacy, Security, and Data Protection, COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing, Music Therapy and Health, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, and Career Development and Diversity.

Richardson has a significant number of coauthors with whom they have frequently collaborated. These include:

  • Jane Walsh
  • Liam Glynn
  • Katie Crowley
  • Lisa Kelly
  • Hilary Moss

Their publications appear repeatedly in notable venues, reflecting engagement with both medical and technology-focused audiences. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
  • IEEE Access
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • BMJ Open

Among their recent papers are:

  • "A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland" (2020), published in Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)
  • "What Makes Agile Software Development Agile?" (2021), published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "Blockchain-Based Identity Management Systems in Health IoT: A Systematic Review" (2022), published in IEEE Access
  • "Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature" (2021), published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Sentiment analysis of user feedback on the HSE's Covid-19 contact tracing app" (2021), published in Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

Best Publications

  • Global software development and collaboration: barriers and solutions

    John Noll;Sarah Beecham;Ita Richardson

  • Software development project success and failure from the supplier's perspective: A systematic literature review

    Paula Savolainen;Paula Savolainen;Jarmo J. Ahonen;Ita Richardson

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: Why are Small Software Organizations Different?

    Ita Richardson;Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim

  • Challenges of project management in global software development: A client-vendor analysis

    Mahmood Niazi;Mahmood Niazi;Sajjad Mahmood;Mohammad Alshayeb;Mohammed Rehan Riaz

  • A Process Framework for Global Software Engineering Teams

    Ita Richardson;Valentine Casey;Fergal Mccaffery;John Burton

  • Virtual Teams

    Unknown

  • Service engineering

    Vasilios Andrikopoulos;Antonio Bucchiarone;Elisabetta Di Nitto;Raman Kazhamiakin

  • Culture in Global Software Development - A Weakness or Strength?

    Sadhana Deshpande;Ita Richardson;Valentine Casey;Sarah Beecham

  • Uncovering the reality within virtual software teams

    Valentine Casey;Ita Richardson

  • Project Management within Virtual Software Teams

    Valentine Casey;Ita Richardson

  • A national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 digital contact tracing in the Republic of Ireland.

    Michael Edmund O'Callaghan;Jim Buckley;Brian Fitzgerald;Kevin Johnson

  • Lean/Agile Software Development Methodologies in Regulated Environments – State of the Art

    Oisín Cawley;Xiaofeng Wang;Ita Richardson

  • Aligning healthcare innovation and software requirements through design thinking

    Noel Carroll;Ita Richardson

  • Problem Based Learning in the Software Engineering Classroom

    Ita Richardson;Yvonne Delaney

  • Using the Cloud to Facilitate Global Software Development Challenges

    Sajid Ibrahim Hashmi;Viktor Clerc;Maryam Razavian;Christina Manteli

  • Identification of Software Process Knowledge Management

    Bridget Meehan;Ita Richardson

  • SPI Models: What Characteristics are Required for Small Software Development Companies?

    Ita Richardson

  • Distributed development: an education perspective on the global studio project

    Ita Richardson;Allen E. Milewski;Neel Mullick;Patrick Keil

  • What Makes Agile Software Development Agile

    Marco Kuhrmann;Paolo Tell;Regina Hebig;Jil Ann Christin Klunder

  • An agile v-model for medical device software development to overcome the challenges with plan-driven software development lifecycles

    Martin McHugh;Oisin Cawley;Fergal McCaffcry;Ita Richardson

  • Key factors that influence task allocation in global software development

    Sajjad Mahmood;Sajid Anwer;Mahmood Niazi;Mohammad Alshayeb

  • Software process matrix: a small company SPI model

    Ita Richardson

  • Global Software Engineering: A Software Process Approach

    Ita Richardson;Valentine Casey;John Burton;Fergal McCaffery

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Laffey
John G. Laffey University of Galway
Brian Fitzgerald
Brian Fitzgerald University of Limerick
Bashar Nuseibeh
Bashar Nuseibeh The Open University
Pekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson Tampere University
Mahmood Niazi
Mahmood Niazi King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Per Runeson
Per Runeson Lund University
Patricia Lago
Patricia Lago Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rick Rabiser
Rick Rabiser Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Elisabetta Di Nitto
Elisabetta Di Nitto Polytechnic University of Milan
Athena Vakali
Athena Vakali Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth exploring additional online degree options that can complement or expand your skills. Many students find that enrolling in interdisciplinary programs opens up even more career opportunities in fast-growing tech fields.

For those interested in solving environmental challenges, an environmental engineering online degree allows you to apply computer science skills to sustainability and green technology. Alternatively, an online mechanical engineering degree can help you blend software with hardware, leading to careers in robotics or advanced manufacturing.

If you're fascinated by scientific problem-solving, a bachelor of science in physics online can provide rigorous analytical skills highly valued in tech industries. On the data-driven side, consider pursuing one of the cheapest data science masters in usa to boost your qualifications in big data, artificial intelligence, and machine learning.

Each of these online degrees offers flexible learning paths and the chance to specialize for the evolving digital job market.

Best Scientists Citing Ita Richardson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles